Video message, posted without a caption
❤5❤🔥5

Channel
@thewholepoint
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
547subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001562551415 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thewholepoint |
| Created | 29 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thewholepoint |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 547 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 550 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 551 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 551 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
272 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 157 | 57.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 42 | 15.4% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 6.62% | |
| custom 5346085319638792856 | 11 | 4.04% | |
| custom 5341369544332026066 | 8 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5399888628358855518 | 6 | 2.21% | |
| custom 5416076480356559241 | 2 | 0.735% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2024 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thewholepoint. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2024 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5❤🔥5
Друзья, мы долго думали о будущем подкаста. А потом поняли, что нам нужно либо выходить на новый уровень и переформатировать его, либо признать, что он отработал свою функцию - с 2022 по 2025 год он служил отличной площадкой для адаптации к резко поменявшемуся миру. И для нас самих, и для наших гостей, и для вас, дорогие слушатели. Мы обсуждали, как сохранить ценности, как вернуть смысл. Вдохновлялись примерами, ка…
❤45custom 53460853196387928569❤🔥6custom 53998886283588555186
48 ⚽️ «Хороший родитель» — это про безупречные графики, идеальные каши и послушных детей? Или про что-то другое? Вместе с командой Мосгортура на фестивале «Московские каникулы» разбирались, что значит быть осознанным родителем — без навязанных норм, без чувства вины и вечного «ты должен». Поговорили о том: 🔸 Как отказаться от мифа об «идеальном родителе» и найти свой собственный сценарий; 🔸 Исследовали инструменты…
🔥9❤1
Друзья! Мы пересобрали нашу концепцию и готовимся к новому сезону. Скоро расскажем и покажем. Знаем, что некоторые из вас даже ждут наш ламповый подкаст. Мы тоже скучаем! ❤️🔥 А пока мы собираемся с силами, наши друзья из Мосгортура позвали нас в коллаборацию. Что из этого вышло - в следующем посте.
👍13❤🔥9❤8
Друзья, мы уходим в заслуженный отпуск. Будем слушать птичек и внутренний полилог, смотреть на закаты и любимых людей. А заодно пересоберем свой собственный смысл, куда без этого. С любовью, Тимур и Маша ❤️🔥
❤34👍2
В одном мире живут “взрослые люди”, которые “нормально делают дела”, “несут ответственность”, мотивированы на собственное развитие, и у которых все получается, а если не получается, то они быстро признают и исправляют свои ошибки, и, разумеется, хотят чтобы их окружали такие же прекрасные и чуть менее мифические. В другом мире — совсем другие люди, которые что-то хотят делать, а что-то не хотят, которые не имеют ник…
❤12custom 53413695443320260664🔥3custom 54160764803565592412
Слушать выпуск на Apple, Яндекс и везде
❤9❤🔥4👍1
47 📇 “Учеба твоя работа, не отвлекайся” — так говорит большое количество родителей своим детям, когда они учились в школе. Многие продолжают эту мантру и в колледже, и в вузе. Результаты подобного подхода всем известны: 20-летние парни с мамой, термосом и бутербродом становятся головной болью для рекрутера. Другой экстремум тоже известен: тут и фотографии с заводов военного времени, и цыганские дети, не получившие…
👍8🔥6custom 53460853196387928562
Какой у вас опыт начала работы? Что вы думаете о подростках и труде?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍3
Вы работали, когда были подростком? Кем? Раздавали листовки? Трудились репетитором? Помогали друзьям родителей с поручениями? Тимур вот помогал отцу писать бизнес-планы, а Маша учила детей английскому языку, оба начали где-то в 14-15 лет. Тогда мы еще не задумывались ни про какие софт скилы и ни про какую культуру труда, а просто хотели заработать и сделать что-то полезное, приобщиться к миру взрослых. Мы выросли и…
❤7
Тимур тут в очередной раз озаботился ростом своих доходов и, удивительное дело, средний доход действительно похож на доход людей, с которыми больше всего времени проводишь. Не то чтобы это новость, но как-то выпадает из внимания, забывается, а потом инсайт. Не знаю как это работает — эффект поля, зеркальные нейроны, подстройка и раппорт, или что-то еще из эволюционной биологии, но люди очевидно подстраиваются под ок…
❤12
Слушать выпуск на Apple, Яндекс и везде
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @thewholepoint. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой у вас опыт начала работы? Что вы думаете о подростках и труде?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
А как у вас отношения с корпорациями?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2024 to 31 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 299,499 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“а смысл” (@thewholepoint), 547 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thewholepoint.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.