Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for трендс бай раша

Channel

трендс бай раша

@thetrend

Not marked by Telegram, checked 21 September 20262 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

1,104,374subscribers

-553 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002586170533
TypeChannel
Usernames@thetrend @yestrend
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held130
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/thetrend

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@thetrend/7042 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 12:03 UTC@stilevotrend/66412 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC0.975 days
@thetrend/7639 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 15:24 UTC@stilevotrend/8638 Nov 2026, 07:40 UTC0.9640 hours
@thetrend/7085 · this entry10 Oct 2026, 09:40 UTC@stilevotrend/68214 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC0.954 days
@thetrend/7134 · this entry13 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC@stilevotrend/71218 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC0.955 days
@thetrend/6719 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC@stilevotrend/52923 Sept 2026, 09:31 UTC0.9523 hours
@thetrend/6639 · this entry18 Sept 2026, 12:45 UTC@stilevotrend/51821 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC0.923 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@stilevotrend23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.943 daysthis entry (23–0)
@creativsh15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9814 hoursthis entry (15–0)
@latrends8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.955.7 hoursthis entry (8–0)
@TOPOR_CONTENT6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007.0 hoursthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 452 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Views and reactions moved apart

On 2 of the 193 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0053 reactions per view.

Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
PostOverViewsReactionsExpected
/718216 Oct 2026, 09:06 UTC34 minutes5,600 → 7,750at least +2,14034 → 35at most +2+11.3
/726220 Oct 2026, 14:59 UTC35 minutes3,680 → 5,740at least +2,05023 → 23at most +1+10.8

Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).

What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.

Recorded under the keys clone_source · view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,093,0471,115,9641,104,505.51,104,3746 August 202611 November 2026
130 measurements spanning 97 days, net -553. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,089,609–1,119,402 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 130
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 07:041,104,374+262
10 Nov 2026, 17:101,104,112+752
9 Nov 2026, 14:501,103,360+41
9 Nov 2026, 02:571,103,319+466
8 Nov 2026, 09:571,102,853-321
7 Nov 2026, 21:081,103,174-179
7 Nov 2026, 01:011,103,353-77
6 Nov 2026, 21:171,103,430-77
6 Nov 2026, 02:161,103,507+14
5 Nov 2026, 22:481,103,493-352
4 Nov 2026, 22:581,103,845-3
4 Nov 2026, 21:001,103,848-499
3 Nov 2026, 21:281,104,347no change
3 Nov 2026, 21:041,104,347-536
2 Nov 2026, 22:091,104,883-97
2 Nov 2026, 19:371,104,980-73
1 Nov 2026, 23:141,105,053no change
1 Nov 2026, 21:361,105,053-503
1 Nov 2026, 02:451,105,556no change
31 Oct 2026, 22:471,105,556first reading

Engagement

630 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.44%
avg views ÷ 1,104,374 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,900
193 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.685%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
193
of 630 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held630 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total3,073,700
Reactions total21,063
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40m 18s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 142 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 194 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 186 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 4.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 27.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 72.5% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 12,400 views — 1.12% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 15,000).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/770511 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC628 minutes – 3.1 hours old4,720 views ~30 reactions60 minutes: 2,560 → 3.0 hours: 4,720still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h51 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/770410 Nov 2026, 18:28 UTC272 minutes – 15 hours old10,900 views ~190 reactions60 minutes: 3,910 interp. → 3.0 hours: 5,882 interp. → 6.0 hours: 6,680 → 12 hours: 9,360still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/770010 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC2736 minutes – 16 hours old12,200 views ~77 reactions60 minutes: 4,810 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,597 interp. → 6.0 hours: 8,640 → 12 hours: 10,800still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/769910 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC347 minutes – 18 hours old10,000 views ~58 reactions60 minutes: 2,589 interp. → 3.0 hours: 4,450 → 6.0 hours: 8,190 → 12 hours: 8,800still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h3.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/769810 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC365 minutes – 19 hours old9,950 views ~186 reactions60 minutes: 2,878 interp. → 3.0 hours: 5,538 interp. → 6.0 hours: 8,350 → 12 hours: 8,940still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/769610 Nov 2026, 12:33 UTC3827 minutes – 21 hours old8,620 views ~66 reactions60 minutes: 3,600 interp. → 3.0 hours: 5,626 interp. → 6.0 hours: 6,840 → 12 hours: 7,810still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h88 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/769210 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC4024 minutes – 23 hours old11,900 views ~35 reactions60 minutes: 3,657 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,178 interp. → 6.0 hours: 9,290 → 12 hours: 10,900 → 24 hours: 11,900still climbing at last reading11,900measured2.4 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/769110 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC4425 minutes – 26 hours old14,700 views ~266 reactions60 minutes: 5,310 → 3.0 hours: 8,635 interp. → 6.0 hours: 11,600 → 12 hours: 13,600 → 24 hours: 14,400still climbing at last reading14,400measured2.3 hours

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

79,993 reactions across 626 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40,73950.9%
🤣14,69418.4%
❤‍🔥8,57510.7%
🔥7,5919.49%
🗿4,7465.93%
🙏1,9922.49%
🍓1,6562.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 630 of the 630 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80,588 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 630 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
59
of 630 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thetrend. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 630 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.27%
8 of 630 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
8
posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
14,600
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
17,400
over 622 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjc2i6cK128 August 202628 August 2026
2SDnjdPhM1V129 September 202629 September 2026
2SDnjeYCe5h129 August 202629 August 2026
2VtzqwVAAfV124 August 202624 August 2026
2VtzqwdaV8w17 August 20267 August 2026
2VtzqxcGGkd120 October 202620 October 2026
2VtzqxcWLhH118 August 202618 August 2026
2W5zFHJ96TT122 October 202622 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 630 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 193 posts held from the last 30 days (2.59%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC≈4,720 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Предметы для дома, которые выглядят как произведения современного искусства — в новой линейке бренда Solutions собраны минималистичные аксессуары с геометрическими формами. В коллекцию вошли металлический органайзер SPACE с отделениями для мелочей, скульптурные пепельницы и подставки для благовоний. Всё айтемы выполнены в серебристом цвете. Красивое 🤩

❤16🤣7❤‍🔥5🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 18:28 UTC≈10,900 views190 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Как же сммщик Авиасэйлс чувствует 😐

❤129🙏34🔥26❤‍🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 17:55 UTC≈12,200 views77 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

«Ботинки для тех, кто хочет выпустить когти» — дизайнер Александр Самохвалов представил свой новый обувной эксперимент. Автор знаменитых «крысоходов» создал пару с массивными изогнутыми когтями. Идеально, чтобы цепляться за землю в гололёд 🤣

🤣46❤22🔥6🍓2❤‍🔥1

10 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC≈10,000 views58 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Среди сотен минималистичных упаковок мы всё равно выберем этот бриллиант 😂

❤43🤣9🔥6

10 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈9,950 views186 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Платформа, которая работает на мечту селлеров Бизнес, который растёт, не увязая в операционке: витрина, продажи, реклама, доставка и финансы работают как одна система, без десятка кабинетов и ручных сводок. Именно к такому результату стремятся предприниматели, которые хотят заниматься развитием, а не рутиной. Для всех, кому нужен единый центр управления и контроля над бизнесом, Альфа-Банк запустил Альфа-Селлер. Это…

🔥96❤60❤‍🔥30

10 Nov 2026, 12:33 UTC≈8,620 views66 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Коктейль со вкусом… цветных карандашей — московский бар «Инсайдер» решил воссоздать вкус древесного «десерта» из детства. Сочетание виски, ветивера, зеленого кардамона, лемонграсса и содовой отвечает за тот самый «карандашный» вкус. Бокал с цветными кусочками льда продолжает идею стакана со школьными принадлежностями. Гениальная подача 🤭

🤣47❤9🔥8❤‍🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC≈11,900 views35 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Перчатки превратились в… сумки — московский бренд Vijen Store придумал необычные клатчи для тех, кому надоели обычные аксессуары. В коллекции есть модели с портретом Сальвадора Дали и сюрреалистичным человеком с лисьей мордочкой. Внутри — яркая подкладка, а вместо привычной ручки — длинная цепочка, чтобы носить сумочку на плече. Берём? 😂

🤣20❤9❤‍🔥6

10 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC≈14,700 views266 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Додо пицца выкатила «Малинки в шоколаде» — нашумевший десерт из ягод и шоколада обойдется всего в 279 рублей. Однозначно пробуем 🤯

❤196🍓40❤‍🔥25🤣5

9 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈17,200 views65 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Самый любимый десерт из детства — необычная новинка от кофейни Mates. «Бутерброд с вареньем» здесь представлен в необычном исполнении. За основы был взят японский хлеб, обжаренный с тростниковым сахаром и медом. В начинке — смородиново-черничное варенье и шарик пломбира. Звучит даже слишком роскошно 🤣

❤57🔥5🤣2🙏1

9 Nov 2026, 15:40 UTC≈14,300 views196 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Кто-то понимает эти символы на скриншоте? 🤯

🤣144❤38🙏14

9 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC≈16,300 views124 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

В Telegram могут появиться видеосообщения в форме… котиков и сердечек — в сети показали концепт функции, которая позволит менять привычную круглую форму видео. Кружочки предлагают превратить в сердечки, звёздочки, облака, квадраты и даже кошачьи мордочки. Пока это лишь концепт, и неизвестно, решат ли разработчики добавить такую возможность в мессенджер. Нам просто необходимы кружочки-котики 🤣

❤82🤣24❤‍🔥18

9 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC≈12,900 views64 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Самый очаровательный напиток — творение Palma coffee. Кофейня добавила в меню шоколадного мишку, которого можно добавить в любой напиток. Обойдется очаровательный декор в 250 рублей. Самое милое на сегодня 😊

❤44🍓13❤‍🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 630 posts we hold for @thetrend. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@thetrend edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @thetrend as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
9.7 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“трендс бай раша” (@thetrend), 1,104,374 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thetrend.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.