Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мыслитель

Channel

Мыслитель

@thethinker_bet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

17subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793255784
TypeChannel
Username@thethinker_bet
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/thethinker_bet

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

172018.57 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18 subscribers7 October 2026 — 17 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 61 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 23:4117-1
5 Sept 2026, 11:5918-1
15 Aug 2026, 02:2719-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:3220no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1820first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤250.0%
🆒125.0%
🔥125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026

Фора 0 на «Ахмат» — 1.7 (3.5%)✅ Индивидуальный тотал «Ахмата» больше 1 гола — 1.73 (2.5%)❌ Банк: 63 158,43 ₽ 1.70 (3,5% = 2 210,55) → возврат → 0 1.73 (2,5% = 1 578,96) → проигрыш → –1 578,96 Результат: –1 578,96 ₽ Новый банк: 63 158,43 – 1 578,96 = 61 579,47 ₽

10 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⚽ 💙ФАКЕЛ — АХМАТ💚 РПЛ. 3-й тур. Центральный стадион профсоюзов, Воронеж. 10 августа, 19:30 МСК. Судья: Алексей Сухой (Люберцы). В прошлом сезоне РПЛ отработал 14 матчей в ранге главного, показал 69 жёлтых карточек (в среднем 4.6 ЖК за игру), удалил 2 игроков, назначил 8 пенальти. Коротко о ситуации «Факел» — 16-е место, 0 очков. «Ахмат» — 14-е место, 1 очко. Букмекеры отдают предпочтение грозненцам, но «Факел» не…

9 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026

📆 Банк на начало: 60 013,71 ₽ 1.93 (3% = 1 800,41) ✅ → +1 674,38 3.45 (1% = 600,14) ✅ → +1 470,34 Выигрыши: 1 674,38 + 1 470,34 = 3 144,72 ₽ 💰 Чистый результат дня: +3 144,72 ₽ 🏦 Новый банк: 60 013,71 + 3 144,72 = 63 158,43 ₽

9 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

💙«Динамо» Москва — «Динамо» Махачкала💙 Победа с учётом форы -1 Динамо Москва — 1.93 (3%) Московское «Динамо» дома — явный фаворит. Москвичи пока не набрали форму, но традиционно сильны на своём поле. Ожидаю победу москвичей с разницей минимум в 2 гола. Двойник: 💙«Зенит» — «Родина»💙 (Родина забьёт) 2.20 + ❤️«Рубин» — «Оренбург»💙 (Оренбург забьёт) 1.57 ≡ 3.45 (1%) «Родина» играет против «Зенита» на выезде, но коман…

2 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC11 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

📆 (банк на начало: 60 285,00 ₽) 1. 1.70 (3% = 1 808,55) ❌ → –1 808,55 2. 1.73 (4,5% = 2 712,83) ❌ → –2 712,83 3. 1.75 (3% = 1 808,55) ✅ → +1 356,41 4. 1.73 (3% = 1 808,55) ✅ → +1 320,24 5. 2.36 (2% = 1 205,70) ✅ → +1 639,75 6. 1.63 (3% = 1 808,55) ✅ → +1 139,39 7. 2.13 (2% = 1 205,70) ❌ → –1 205,70 Выигрыши (4 ставки): 1 356,41 + 1 320,24 = 2 676,65 +1 639,75 = 4 316,40 +1 139,39 = 5 455,79 ₽ Проигрыши (3 ставки):…

🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC10 viewsread 11 August 2026

1. «Ахмат» — «Спартак»: «Спартак» не проиграет + тотал 1.5 больше — 1.63 (3%)✅ 2. Двойник: «Оренбург» — «Зенит»: тотал 3.5 меньше + «Краснодар» не проиграет и тотал 3.5 меньше — 2.13 (2%)❌ Факел после 85 минуты решил вспомнить что они тоже умеют играть в футбол и кинули 2 мяча, которые обламали пресс.

2 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC9 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

1. «Ахмат» — «Спартак»: «Спартак» не проиграет + тотал 1.5 больше — 1.63 (3%) «Спартак» — фаворит, но и «Ахмат» может ответить. В Грозном всегда тяжело играть гостям, у хозяев хорошая линия нападения, поэтому жду минимум 2 гола в матче. 2. Двойник: «Оренбург» — «Зенит»: тотал 3.5 меньше + «Краснодар» не проиграет и тотал 3.5 меньше — 2.13 (2%) «Оренбург» дома — неудобный соперник для «Зенита». Весной оренбуржцы уж…

1 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

+ тройник (экспресс) ЦСКА не проиграет и тотал 1.5 больше 1.35 + гол Балтики 1.4 + гол Локомотива 1.25 = 2.36 (2%)

1 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⚽ АКРОН — РУБИН РПЛ. 2-й тур. «Солидарность Самара Арена», Самара. 1 августа, 14:00 МСК. Судья: Ян Бобровский (Санкт-Петербург). За карьеру в РПЛ провёл 14 матчей, показал 42 жёлтые карточки (в среднем 3.0 за игру), 1 вторую жёлтую, 3 красные, поставил 4 пенальти. В среднем фиксирует 28.3 фола за матч. Коротко о ситуации «Акрон» и «Рубин» неудачно начали сезон. В составе «Рубина» не сыграет защитник Илья Рожков и…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thethinker_bet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мыслитель” (@thethinker_bet), 17 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thethinker_bet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.