Chính thức‼️Lịch thi đấu trận tranh hạng 3 và trận chung kết Fifa Asian Cup 2026

Channel
Thể Thao 247 ⚽️
@thethao247s
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,046subscribers
-545 since we began measuring on 4 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002115615903 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thethao247s |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thethao247s |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 11,046 | -19 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 11,065 | -32 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:18 | 11,097 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:39 | 11,113 | -16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 11,129 | -24 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:37 | 11,153 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 11,167 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 12:50 | 11,177 | -25 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 11,202 | -28 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 11,230 | -26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 11,256 | -31 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 11,287 | -20 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 11,307 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 11,319 | -26 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 11,345 | -9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 11,354 | -22 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 11,376 | -31 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 11,407 | -82 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 22:38 | 11,489 | -102 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 11,591 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 78.6%
- avg views ÷ 11,046 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,680
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 January 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 78,130 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
330 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 117 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 71 | 21.5% | |
| 🗿 | 45 | 13.6% | |
| 🥰 | 24 | 7.27% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 6.06% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 5.76% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 4.85% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 4.55% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Cuối cùng thì chúng ta cũng phải nói lời chia tay với Cristiano Ronaldo
Đội Tuyển Quốc Gia Trung Quốc bỏ giải cỏ Asian Cup do Fifa tổ chức để đá giao hữu và thua Đội Tuyển Palestin 0-5 😳
Chính thức bảng xếp hạng FiFa Asean Cup sau giai đoạn vòng bảng
Đội tuyển Việt Nam Dành Vé Chơi Trận Tranh Hạng 3 Sau Khi Dành Chiến Thắng Vất Vả 4-2 Trước Đội Tuyển Pakistan
Tiền đạo ĐT Việt Nam kịp trở về bên mẹ ngay trước lúc lâm chung 👇
Thật sự là không thể tin nổi! Điều chưa bao giờ xuất hiện đã xảy ra với những diễn biến có thể nói là vô tiền khoáng hậu trong bóng đá.
Bảng tỷ số hiện thêm 2 phút bù giờ, nhưng trận đấu kéo dài qua phút bù giờ thứ 3 thì trợ lý trọng tài ngoài sân thông báo có 7 phút bù giờ. Đồ họa truyền hình đổi từ +2 lên +7 phút bù giờ. Indonesia ghi 2 bàn ở phút 90+6 và 90+7, qua đó vào chung kết. #FIFAAseancup2026
Đội tuyển u23 uzbekistan lỡ hẹn với vòng chung kết ASIAD khi sút trúng xà ngang trong loạt sút luân lưu trước u23 nhật bản
Đội bóng từng loại u23 Việt Nam tiếp tục khẳng định sức mạnh, ngược dòng đánh bại u23 Trung Quốc để ghi tên mình vào vòng chung kết! ASIAD 2026
‼️ TRẬN THUA ĐÁNG TIẾC CỦA ĐT VIỆT NAM TRƯỚC “VOI CHIẾN” 🇻🇳😔 ❌ Một giải đấu mà chúng ta phải chia tay nhiều trụ cột vì chấn thương, trong khi đối thủ mang đến đội hình mạnh nhất với hàng loạt ngôi sao trở lại... 🇹🇭 Thái Lan đã tận dụng tốt những cơ hội để giành chiến thắng, khép lại một trận đấu đầy tiếc nuối với ĐT Việt Nam. ❌ Như vậy, chuỗi 27 trận bất bại lịch sử của HLV Kim Sang-sik chính thức khép lại tại FIFA A…
❤1
🇻🇳🇹🇭 CHÍNH THỨC: Đội hình xuất phát của ĐT Việt Nam trong trận đại chiến với Thái Lan tại FIFA ASEAN CUP 2026 🔥🔥 ➡️Kèo bóng admin lên ở : @chaolua247
❤21🥰21🎉19🔥15🤩15👏14👍13
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thethao247s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Thể Thao 247 ⚽️” (@thethao247s), 11,046 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thethao247s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.