Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 65 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 02:00
169
-1
1 Oct 2026, 11:37
170
+1
9 Sept 2026, 19:36
169
+1
31 Aug 2026, 06:34
168
-1
23 Aug 2026, 09:18
169
+1
8 Aug 2026, 15:31
168
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:22
168
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 02s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
66 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
24
36.4%
❤
11
16.7%
⚡
8
12.1%
❤🔥
8
12.1%
👍
8
12.1%
🎉
3
4.55%
👾
2
3.03%
😁
1
1.52%
🤝
1
1.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
P. S.
Возможно, что какие-то подробности про Деревни, Горы, виды чайных деревьев — это пока что абстрактная информация для тебя.
Так или иначе, если будешь продолжать пить чай, то со временем начнешь замечать какую-то разницу во вкусах того же шу или шэн пуэра.
Вот тут и откроется новый мир, выстроится понимание взаимосвязи всех вышеперечисленных факторов и сухая буква станет живым вкусом.
Всему свое время.
Сейчас, н…
Акклиматизация чая
Бывает, что недавно приехавший в РФ пуэр первое время после вскрытия упаковки кажется пустоватым.
Ему нужно отлежаться и вкус наберёт полноту👌🏻
Распаковываю новый чай
Чуть чуть говорю про местности происхождения сырья, про изменения вкуса
Протестировал Шу из Лао Мань Э (такая деревня в районе БанЧжан).
Все, как и заявлено, вкус есть, но в зачатках. Аромат фундука впечатлил. И состояние тоже оче…
И, так как я уже сдавал тут экзамен на среднюю категорию, мне назначили право проведения чайных церемоний на базе центра. Поэтому, можно организоваться группой из Челябинска и сделать экскурсионный выезд.
Сам центр ЦзиШи — это, можно сказать, музей китайской культуры. Здесь преподают китайский язык и каллиграфию, имеется большая экспозиция оружия и доспехов, музыкальных инструментов и предметов искусства.
Если есть …
Съездил вчера к Дядюшке Нодарию, в Китайский культурно-языковой центр ЦзиШи
Начали мою подготовку к сдаче экзамена на высшую категорию чайного мастерства.
Разбирали Гуанадунский стиль заваривания, немного поговорили о глинах.
На разминке пили зелёный чай дедовским китайским способом (настаивали в специальном стеклянном чахае).
Затем дали пару Дань Цунов, один прогревали в специальной чаше на очаге.
Познавательно и…
У Рустама теперь есть полкилограмма GABA
Он счастлив, это хорошо
❤6👾2🔥2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @theteamoment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@theteamoment named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@nodariy_diakon named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 16 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чайный Момент” (@theteamoment), 169 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theteamoment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.