5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,114–7,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 14:57
7,116
-14
14 Aug 2026, 05:18
7,130
+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:02
7,127
+6
7 Aug 2026, 16:36
7,121
+4
7 Aug 2026, 02:45
7,117
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.4%
avg views ÷ 7,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
24 (12 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
17,506
Reactions total
192
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,100
Videos
≈224
Links
≈140
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
304 reactions across 23 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
258
84.9%
🔥
35
11.5%
😭
8
2.63%
🤯
3
0.987%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 304reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
pliss anyone pro math and top student can share tips to study math especially math lower form sebab dari f1 sampai trial spm asyik fail math,tak pernah lulus.
how can korang yang lulus math and score math study eh?? plis share tips,im begging untuk kalini sebab spm dah dekat 😭 + sesapa ada tips study sains jugaa
next week mid sem , so far alhamdulillah still survive di sem 1 walaupun agak laju .
i think bila masuk uni , i agree dgn statement yg kawan kita mempengaruhi diri kita jugak , mcm mana circle kita and so on , bila i nampak my friends and roommates study hard , i rasa mcm nk compete and takde rasa negative competition pun tau , just feeling like nak berjaya sama ii , soo please cari circle yang sesuai dgn diri kita …
im scared i cant achieve that what i want .. week 2 in semester 3 make me feel " yg paling lemah dari orang lain " sakitnya bila someone saying that im someone " cepat rasa giveup " while everyday im trying to survive ...
(Gmbr tk berkaitan)
Hii for those yg matriculation students, i nk tanya how nk study physics and other subjects? Sbb sedih asyik dpt markah rendah je dlm test and lagi sedih atp im afraid that my lect fed up dgn me hm. Like imagine being senior but still tk pandai. Atp im just thinking of dropout sbb dh sedih sngt
selama ni asyik konsisten dapat A untuk sej but untuk trial ni lepas jawab paper sej terus tak suka sejarah HAHAHAH,nak tips untuk terus study and boleh lebih mahir dekat kbat sejarah sebab makin tak faham kbat 😭
Hi, Assalamualaikum, for spm students y ambil elektif perniagaan, saya nak tanya, untuk spm nanti kita nak kena buat apa ye? apa yang kita perlu hafal? sebab kita tahu tajuk takkan diberi
jadi apa kita perlu buat adakah menghafal 1 buku?lain lah ppt dengan trial tajuk akan diberi oleh cikgu
tapi pada spm macam mana ye, apa y perlu saya buat?
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @thespmjourney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 830,673 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝘕𝘖𝘛𝘈 & 𝘔𝘖𝘋𝘜𝘓 𝘚𝘗𝘔 𝘒𝘚𝘚𝘔 08 // 09 ♡︎ 🇲🇾🇵🇸 @spmstudytips · 107,663 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 August 2026
Soalan Percubaan SPM ✍ @soalanpercubaanspm · 248,616 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DAYS BEFORE EXAM ♡” (@thespmjourney), 7,116 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thespmjourney.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.