Channel
@thesin7
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,981subscribers
+350 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001846560816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thesin7 |
| Description | چنل کاری: @sinredwork دانشجوی پزشکی؛ترم هفتم. انگیزشیزردوابیوقرمزنداره؛هرچیزی کهبهتکمککنهبخودتبیای؛طلاییه. تکستاموبخونشایدذرهاییبراتتلنگربود. برایپدربزرگمیهفاتحهبگو:)🩶 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thesin7 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
9,960 average views per post against 7,812 subscribers — an engagement rate of 127.4%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 119,460 |
| Mature posts only | 137.2% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 7,812 measured 4 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:fas · 5,759 channels · p10 2.16% · p25 5.05% · p50 11.1% · p75 21.9% · p90 35.8% |
| Position in cohort | 99.218th percentile · 11.4× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.064% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 21:21 | 7,981 | +45 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:48 | 7,936 | +124 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:20 | 7,812 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:40 | 7,821 | +28 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:20 | 7,793 | +25 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:06 | 7,768 | +548 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 7,220 | +33 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:52 | 7,187 | +19 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 07:28 | 7,168 | -30 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:39 | 7,198 | +110 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 7,088 | +267 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 6,821 | -42 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 6,863 | -39 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 6,902 | -63 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 6,965 | -103 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 7,068 | -79 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:48 | 7,147 | -29 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 7,176 | -35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:34 | 7,211 | -41 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 7,252 | first reading |
53 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (27 June 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 100,902 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 02:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3,891 reactions across 28 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 3,181 | 81.8% | |
| ❤ | 481 | 12.4% | |
| 💅 | 215 | 5.53% | |
| ✍ | 14 | 0.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,891 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
یه چیزی رو باید قبول کنی؛ توی مسیر کنکور، فقط درس خوندن مهم نیست، اینکه نسبت به بقیه کجای مسیری هم مهمه. ممکنه امروز از عملکردت راضی باشی، ساعت مطالعهات خوب باشه و فکر کنی داری درست پیش میری؛ اما همزمان، یکی دیگه داره ضعفهاش رو برطرف میکنه، تست بیشتری میزنه و خودش رو به هدفت نزدیکتر میکنه. رقابت منتظر تو نمیمونه. آزمون بعدی هم به خاطر اینکه این هفته خسته بودی یا حوصله نداشتی، آسونتر نمیشه. قرار نیست مدا…
و بالاخره پایان سال دوم پزشکی🤍 📍دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران
📅 یکشنبه ۱۷ آبان ۱۴۰۵ 📚۶ ماه ۱۴ روز مانده (۱۹۶ روز) تا امتحانات نهایی ⏳۷ ماه و ۲۲ روز مانده (۲۳۵ روز) تا کنکور 📌تاریخ شروع امتحانات نهایی: حدودا ۱ خرداد 📌 تاریخ برگزاری کنکور: ۱٠ و ۱۱ تیر
اون تستای لعنتی رو لطفاً بزن.
چالش هفته بعد: جمع ساعت هفته بعد ۶۰ ساعت به بالا. بالاترین مجموع ساعت مطالعه توی چنل قرار میگیره. (برنده ها زیر همون پست هستن) کی پایه اولین چالش مجموع ساعت مطالعه هفتست؟ (من قبولیم رو مدیون چالشهام:)
چطور بفهمیم دقیقاً توی کدوم مبحث ضعف داریم؟ واقعیتش نباید با دیدن چند تا غلط سریع نتیجه بگیریم که کل یه فصل رو بلد نیستیم. مثلاً فرض کن از یه فصل ۱۰ تا تست اومده و تو ۶ تاش رو غلط زدی. وقتی بررسی میکنی، میبینی ۴ تا از غلطهات مربوط به یه مبحث مشخصه. اینجا باید یکم دقیقتر بشی و ببینی مشکل از کجاست؛ خوب نخوندن اون قسمت، فراموش کردن نکات یا نداشتن تسلط کافی روی تستها؟ حالا چیکار کنیم؟ کاری که من انجام میدادم ا…
موضوع: چقدر تحلیل آزمون از خود آزمون مهمتره؟ چقدر تحلیل آزمون توی پیشرفت ما تأثیر داره؟ آیا صرفاً شرکت کردن توی آزمون و دیدن درصدها برای پیشرفت کافیه؟ بعد از آزمون باید چیکار کنیم؟ واقعیتش از نظر من، ارزش اصلی آزمون زمانی مشخص میشه که بشینیم و عملکردمون رو بررسی کنیم. خیلیها آزمون میدن، درصدهاشون رو میبینن، از نتیجه خوشحال یا ناراحت میشن و منتظر آزمون بعدی میمونن. اما این دقیقاً همون چیزیه که باعث میشه اش…
موضوع: چقدر تستزدن مهمه و چه زمانی باید تست رو شروع کنیم؟ چقدر تستزدن توی مسیر کنکور مهمه؟ آیا باید اول تمام مطالب رو یاد بگیریم و بعد بریم سراغ تست؟ چه زمانی تستزدن رو شروع کنیم؟ واقعیتش یکی از اشتباهاتی که خیلی از بچهها مرتکب میشن، اینه که تست رو میذارن برای زمانی که احساس میکنن به تسلط کافی رسیدن. اما من همیشه معتقدم تستزدن بخشی از فرآیند یادگیریه، نه فقط مرحلهای برای سنجش خودت. مثلاً من چیکار میکرد…
سه شنبه همیشه روز مهمی بوده برای من، انگار پایان اول هفته و شروع اخر هفتهست اگر امروز رو خوب تموم کنی،حس خوبی بهت میده شک نکن. چالش از ساعت ۱۵ تا ۲۱ (۶ساعت) هرکسی بیشترین رو داشت چنلش رو میزارم. کی پایست؟ برنده
آدما رو سال کنکور چیکار کنیم؟ کنار بزارید،بعد از قبولی و کنکور تایم برای دوست یابی و وقت گذروندن با دوست های قدیمی خیلی هست. کاملاً این از تجربه خودم و اطرافیانم بعد قبولی میاد؛ آدمها رو کنار بزارید و برید تو غار تنهاییتون. با کسی ارتباط خاصی برقرار نکنید. احساساتتون رو درگیر نکنید لطفا و لطفا وارد یک فضایی بشید که فقط خودتون هستید و کتابهاتون. وارد غار تنهایی شدن یکی از بهترین تصمیم های تو میشه و بعد ها به خوبی ازش …
چقدر ساعت مطالعه بالا برای ما مهمه؟ نه اونقدر زیاد که کیفیت رو خراب کنیم و نه اونقدر کم که خودمون رو گول بزنیم؟ -چه ساعت مطالعه ای مناسب ماست؟ واقعیتش مهم ترین چیز از نظر من و برای من،نگه داشتن ساعت مطالعه روی یه رنج خاصی بود. مثلا من چیکار میکردم؟ برای خودم پایین تر حد ساعت مطالعه تعیین میکردم.حدوداً هر ماه. برای مثال آبان ماه نباید زیر ۹ ساعت میخوندم،اما فروردین ماه این ساعت به ۱۲ رسید. چجوری پیشرفت کنیم و چقدر؟ تل…
شاید یکی از مهم ترین کارهایی که میشه کرد که تو راه موفقیت موند،در هر حالی ادامه دادنه. حالت بده؟ادامه بده. ول نکن.این ول نکردنه است که نتیجه رو برای تو به بهترین نحو میچرخونه. شاید خیلی جاها یک ساعت درس خوندن تو روز پریود شدن برای ما بی اهمیت باشه،ولی واقعیتش موثره. من کمال گرایی رو روزی ترک کردم که صبح دیر پاشدم و شب بالاترین ساعت مطالعه رو ثبت کردم. پیروزی و عدم شکست به ادامه دادنه.هرجوری که بلدی ادامه بده و ول نکن…
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @thesin7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@thesin7 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 7 posts on @thesin7 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SinRed” (@thesin7), 7,981 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thesin7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.