Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Θερσίτης

Channel

Θερσίτης

@thersitisnew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,440subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002131542017
TypeChannel
Username@thersitisnew
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thersitisnew

Growth

1,4391,4441,441.58 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,444 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,440 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,439 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,440 subscribers1,4408 August 202629 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 22 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,438–1,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 19:281,440-1
24 Aug 2026, 13:231,441+2
21 Aug 2026, 07:441,439-1
18 Aug 2026, 08:421,440-2
15 Aug 2026, 02:121,442-2
11 Aug 2026, 08:561,444+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:331,443no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:311,443first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.0%
avg views ÷ 1,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
389
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,275
Reactions total220
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8639.1%
👍6630.0%
😁2310.5%
💯2210.0%
🤔94.09%
🤡94.09%
😢31.36%
👏10.455%
🖕10.455%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC293 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‼️ ΠΛΗΡΗΣ ΔΙΑΣΥΡΜΟΣ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ! ↗️ Η Συμφωνία του Ιράν με το Ομάν - των δύο χωρών δηλαδή που ελέγχουν τις δύο ακτές των Στενών του Ορμούζ - που ανακοίνωσε το Reuters κι άλλα διεθνή μέσα, για κοινή, αποκλειστική απ’ αυτούς, διαχείριση της ναυσιπλοΐας στο πέρασμα, σφραγίζει την ΗΤΤΑ του Αμερικανοσιωνιστικού άξονα στην περιοχή: ✅ Η συμφωνία προβλέπει ⬅️ 2 γραμμές πλεύσης στην πλευρά του Ιράν και 1 στην πλευρά του Ομάν

13👍9😁3

5 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC364 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤡Στην άλλη πλευρά τώρα, η σημερινή “ονείρωξη” του κλόουν Τραμπ, ήθελε τον ίδιο σαν … στρατηλάτη - φωτογραφημένο ανάμεσα στους στρατηγούς Πάττον και Μακ Άρθουρ, φημισμένους από τον Β’ Παγκόσμιο πόλεμο! (🤦‍♂️ …αλλά με περισσότερα αστέρια και παράσημα!) 🤡 Εντελώς καραγκιόζης …

11🤡9😁3

5 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC314 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🗣 Ο Ρώσος πρόεδρος Βλαντιμίρ Πούτιν πραγματοποίησε συνάντηση εργασίας με τους κορυφαίους αξιωματούχους του Υπουργείου Άμυνας την Τετάρτη. Ο υπουργός Άμυνας Αντρέι Μπελούσοφ συμμετείχε στην σύσκεψη. Σημαντικά σημεία: 🔛 “Κατόπιν πρότασης του υπουργού Άμυνας, ενοποιούνται όλες οι υπηρεσίες logistics, εφοδιασμού και υποστήριξης υπό μία ενιαία διοίκηση. Στις σύγχρονες συνθήκες, αυτό είναι επίσης πολεμικό έργο — πλήρω

12👍3🤔2

4 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC345 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Κάποιες σκέψεις για την 4η Αυγούστου και το …”Γιατί χαίρεται ο κόσμος και χαμογελά, πατέρα;” Το φασιστικό/μοναρχικό πραξικόπημα της 4ης Αυγούστου 1936, σαν σήμερα πριν 90 χρόνια, και η δικτατορία του Μεταξά μετά, θυμίζουν ορισμένα πολιτικά, κοινωνικά και ιστορικά συμπεράσματα, που έχουν ΠΑΝΤΑ και ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ιδιαίτερη αξία: 1️⃣ Ο Μεταξικός φασισμός, όχι μόνο δεν βρέθηκε αντιμέτωπος με κάποια …παλλαϊκή, έστω μαζική αντί

👍1310🤔2👏1🖕1

2 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC452 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

👆Στο μέτωπο της Ουκρανίας επίσης φαίνεται σαν … “να πήρε ξανά μπροστά” η Ρωσία! ⬆️ Σύμφωνα με τα επίσημα στοιχεία του Ρωσικού Υπουργείου Άμυνας, τον Ιούλιο απελευθερώθηκαν 574 τετ.χλμ. και 26 οικισμοί ενώ οι απώλειες των ουκρανικών δυνάμεων τον ίδιο μήνα, στο πεδίο της μάχης έφτασαν τους 44.500 άνδρες (νεκροί και τραυματίες) ⬆️ Μετά απο … το σημειωτόν κάποιων μηνών που φαίνεται και στον πίνακα πάνω συγκριτικά -🤦‍♂️

16👍7🤔3

2 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC435 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Στο μέτωπο του Ιράν τώρα: ⬆️ Αφού για κάμποσες μέρες τώρα είχε ο Τραμπ 🇺🇸(ξανα)λυσσάξει ότι “θα τους δείξω, θα τους εξαφανίσω…” και τέτοια, 🤡(ξανα)κάνοντας την ανάγκη φιλοτιμία που λένε, 🤡(ξανα)ακύρωσε τα …χτυπήματα που έταζε 🤡(ξανα)εκλιπαρώντας για …συμφωνία! Ενώ αφού ήδη είχε “εκκενώσει” τις καμμένες βάσεις, αεροδρόμια, ναύσταθμους, στόλο, στρατό, αρχηγεία, πρεσβείες απ’ την περιοχή, τώρα με επίσημη ανακοίνωση το

👍14😁1

2 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC445 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

… ενώ για νάχει και κάποια “νίκη” να καμαρώνει, μέσα στο σύννεφο απο φάπες απ’ το Ιραν και την Υεμένη, θυμήθηκε τη Βενεζουέλα που την παρουσιάζει σαν …51η Πολιτεία των ΗΠΑ! 😤 Βέβαια η Βενεζουέλα ΔΕΝ ήταν “νίκη του Τραμπ”, παρά μόνον η προδοσία της δωσίλογης ηγεσίας που του παρέδωσε τον Μαδούρο και τη χώρα…

👍12💯5😢3

2 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC350 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤣 🤣🤣 Πάντως ο πόλεμος κατά του Ιράν πρέπει να πηγαίνει ακόμη χειρότερα για τις ΗΠΑ από ό,τι υποψιαζόμασταν, 👆απ´τη στιγμή που ο Τραμπ ξανάρχισε τις φλυαρίες για …την κατάληψη της Γροιλανδίας.

😁16💯41

2 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC410 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/olegyasynsky/2419 ✔️ Την ώρα που 22 “ηγέτες” της ΕΕ -με την υπογραφάρα ΚΑΙ του Μητσοτάκη- “καταγγέλουν” την Ισπανία που δέχτηκε την Αμερικανοσιωνιστική επίθεση μέσω Μαρόκου, για …”ανοχή στους βαρβάρους μετανάστες” που δήθεν “βάζει σε κίνδυνο την …Ευρώπη”… ✔️ την ώρα που χιλιάδες ακροδεξιές και νεοφασιστικές φωνές και πληκτρολόγια έχουν ξεσαλώσει απευθυνόμενοι στους …νοικοκυρέους κι “απαιτώντας” ΑΙΜΑ με

17👍5

1 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC515 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Όταν λοιπόν έχουμε μια Παγκόσμια σύγκρουση σε εξέλιξη και κλιμάκωση, θεωρώ από τουλάχιστον ΑΦΕΛΕΙΣ έως ΣΤΗΜΕΝΟΥΣ όσους -ακόμα κι αν παριστάνουν τους Αριστερούς- “υπερπατριώτες”, “πολεμόκαυλους” και “τουρκοφάγους” κρώζουν για … “επέκταση των χωρικών υδάτων της Ελλάδας στα 12 μίλια”! Ακριβώς γιατί είναι στην ΙΔΙΑ ΛΟΓΙΚΗ του ελέγχου των θαλάσσιων περασμάτων: - Ο ΜΟΝΟΣ ΣΚΟΠΟΣ είναι (⬆️ πάνω)να μετατραπεί το Αιγαίο σε μ

💯136👍3🤔2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @thersitisnew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 390,429 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Θερσίτης” (@thersitisnew), 1,440 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thersitisnew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.