Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Right Side with Doug Billings

Channel

The Right Side with Doug Billings

@therightsidewithdougbillings

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,099subscribers

-245 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001494471836
TypeChannel
Username@therightsidewithdougbillings
Created23 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/therightsidewithdougbillings

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,09910,34410,221.56 August 2026 — 10,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,344 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,335 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,330 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,321 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,306 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,292 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,296 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,286 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,287 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,275 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,266 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,255 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,253 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,242 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,235 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,225 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,227 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,222 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,219 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,216 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,212 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,200 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,198 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,169 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,142 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,127 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,117 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,114 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,099 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,062–10,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:1510,099-15
15 Sept 2026, 17:5810,114-3
14 Sept 2026, 04:1910,117-10
12 Sept 2026, 09:2010,127-15
10 Sept 2026, 03:5710,142-27
6 Sept 2026, 20:3710,169-29
4 Sept 2026, 05:4010,198-2
2 Sept 2026, 20:0910,200-12
1 Sept 2026, 16:1810,212-4
31 Aug 2026, 17:2810,216-3
30 Aug 2026, 15:3410,219-3
29 Aug 2026, 17:3810,222-5
28 Aug 2026, 16:3810,227+2
27 Aug 2026, 19:1510,225-10
26 Aug 2026, 18:0410,235-7
25 Aug 2026, 17:0710,242-4
24 Aug 2026, 13:5810,246-7
22 Aug 2026, 22:5410,253-2
21 Aug 2026, 09:5410,255-11
20 Aug 2026, 12:2310,266first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.73%
avg views ÷ 10,099 subscribers
Avg views / post
478
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held33 (14 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total955
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 25s
Average length
2m 16s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

454 reactions across 32 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤22048.5%
👍17839.2%
🔥408.81%
😱102.20%
😢61.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC344 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

As I predicted, Trump is expanding the beef-relief strategy. Now he’s taking on the Big Four meat processors and moving to give American farmers and ranchers greater freedom to process their own meat—breaking the stranglehold of an overly concentrated processing industry. Consumer relief and more power for American producers. That’s the bigger strategy I’ve been talking about. America First—all the way. Believe …

👍9🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC611 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Requiescat in pace, Dolly. (Rest in Peace in case you’re from Raytown, MO)

❤23🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC729 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

STOP chasing the outrage. The “Trump betrayed ranchers” crowd smelled a click-bait cycle and piled on. But the facts matter: DOJ scrutiny of meatpackers, USDA support for independent processors, Disaster aid, herd protection—and Temporary relief for consumers. Think for yourself. Believe it. For the Republic! Cheers.

👍10

24 Aug 2026, 01:55 UTC753 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

THE BEEF DEBATE IS MISSING THE POINT. Trump’s 90-day beef plan isn’t supposed to solve America’s cattle crisis. It’s a bridge. And yes—American cattlemen have a legitimate concern: cheaper imports can pressure cattle prices and potentially weaken incentives to rebuild the herd. That deserves to be heard. But so does this: CATTLE AREN’T WIDGETS. Rebuilding the herd requires ✔️retaining heifers ✔️breeding ✔️gestation ✔…

❤5👍3

19 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTC867 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

TRUMP’S IRAN STRATEGY: Let them wither on the vine. No talks. No negotiations. No concessions. No compromise. Full naval blockade. Maximum pressure. The Strait of Hormuz stays open. The mines are gone. President Trump isn’t playing the old failed game of endless talks and weak deals. He’s letting the regime choke on its own isolation — exactly as it should be. Strength & Strategy. Nothing less. Believe it. For th…

👍12❤5🔥4

18 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC687 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

The full episode (12 minutes) of the episode about The Ten Commandments: https://youtu.be/tcLvJX7IGGw

😢1

18 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC648 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

The ACLU has asked the Supreme Court to ban the Ten Commandments from every Texas classroom. They call it “establishment of religion.” I call it a direct attack on the moral foundations that built this country. Texas didn’t force anyone to pray. It simply put “Thou shalt not steal” and “Honor thy father and thy mother” where kids can see them. This isn’t about wall space. It’s about whether we still have the courage …

❤7

18 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC647 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026

The media will call it a “purge.” The accurate description is the opposite: Making sure the people on the rolls are actual eligible voters. AG Todd Blanche has signaled the voter-roll fight may head to the Supreme Court. Full breakdown on The Right Side: youtu.be/wgYfenYTuAM Clean rolls. Honest elections. No apologies. We’re in this together. Believe it. For the Republic! Cheers.

👍10

18 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC758 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Clean voter rolls aren’t radical — they’re basic housekeeping. A serious country maintains its voter lists the same way it maintains its borders, its military, and its currency: with discipline and without apology. Removing ineligible names isn’t suppression. Leaving them on is negligence. AG Blanche just signaled this fight may go all the way to the Supreme Court. What does your state do with its voter lists? W…

❤9👍3

17 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC712 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

The online drama machine is melting down over a 3-year-old JD Vance clip. In 2023 he said the dollar’s reserve currency status is a resource curse — and that we’ve been borrowing from poor Chinese people to buy the things they make for us. He’s right. The globalist model hollowed out American manufacturing. Cheap stuff came at the cost of good jobs and national strength. Full context and analysis is up now on The Rig…

👍10❤2

16 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC759 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

49 years ago today, the world lost Elvis Presley. He was the first concert I ever saw. I was 10 years old, and my dad took me. I can still remember the excitement, the music, and seeing Elvis walk onto that stage. That night gave me a memory I’ve carried my entire life — and I’ve been a fan ever since. Some voices never really leave us. As John Lennon said: "Before Elvis, there was nothing." Remembering Elv…

❤17😢1

7 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈1,120 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

I saw someone claim that some “conservative American patriots” don’t vote because they think their vote doesn’t matter. If that’s true, we have work to do. No American conservative patriot sits out an election. Ever. We vote. Period. Refusing to vote b/c you think the system is rigged accomplishes nothing. We don’t surrender our rights because exercising them becomes difficult. Our rights come from God. We honor …

❤20🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @therightsidewithdougbillings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

JovanHuttonPulitzer
@JovanHuttonPulitzer · 26,718
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Right Side with Doug Billings” (@therightsidewithdougbillings), 10,099 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/therightsidewithdougbillings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.