Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for АРТ | Schеdar 🫶🏻

Channel

АРТ | Schеdar 🫶🏻

@therapy_schedar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

270subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003108988877
TypeChannel
Username@therapy_schedar
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/therapy_schedar

Growth

2702722717 August 2026 — 272 subscribers7 August 2026 — 272 subscribers14 August 2026 — 270 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 270–272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:57270-2
7 Aug 2026, 03:16272no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:03272first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.1%
avg views ÷ 270 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,652
Reactions total556
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

556 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥28150.5%
😁18433.1%
🥰498.81%
🔥356.29%
😱71.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 556reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 02:44 UTC18 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Выложила в наш тик ток эдит, за который мне даже немного стыдно (нет) ахаха и надеялась, что его увидит как можно меньше людей, а он как назло собирает просмотры

😁6

6 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC92 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче, я не очень понимаю, зачем люди проявляют инициативу и творчество там, где их об этом не просили, и меняют то, что менять было не нужно. Каждый раз расстраиваюсь, когда получаю не тот результат, на который дала инструкции, а сделать уже нечего и приходится забирать его((

❤‍🔥12

6 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC82 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот про парикмахерские, конечно, заезженная тема, но всё же: у меня очень медленно растут волосы, и я стараюсь их вообще не стричь. Прихожу, говорю: мне ТОЛЬКО 2-3 см срезать и всё. Они срезают 10 и говорят "ну они у вас очень ломались, так надо было для объема" НЕТ. МНЕ. НЕ. НАДО. БЫЛО. Если бы надо было, я бы вам сказала. Или вы должны спросить, не менее. Начинаю думать о том, чтобы если человек творит такую дичь

❤‍🔥14

6 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC84 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Или вот например я говорю: мне нужен зеленый. А мне делают синий и говорят «зеленый плохо смотрелся». Но мне. Нужен. Зелёный. Ты если уже решаешь делать синиц, то ты сначала кидаешь мне зеленый, показываешь, говоришь свое мнение и предлагаешь поменять на синий, а потом уже меняешь. Ну разве это не логично? 😭

❤‍🔥15

6 Aug 2026, 20:28 UTC85 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хуже всего в этом плане мне доводилось работать, наверное, с художниками 😹 Отчасти поэтому я не хочу заказывать арты, потому что художники любят делать что-то от себя, как они видят, хотя этого делать не просили. Например, как я делала тату: мне рисуют эскиз совы, я пишу: «всё заебись, оставляем так, надо поменять только клюв». Проходит время, и мне присылают новый эскиз, где переделано примерно всё, с подписью «я ту

😁11❤‍🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC94 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А есть тут среди вас те, кто делает что-то на заказ? Торты, украшения, сувениры и т.д. Ну или, например, маникюр, причёски... Вот у меня вопрос: если вам человек скинул фотку и сказал «мне надо именно вот это», вы предупреждаете человека о каждой микро мелочи, которая будет отличаться от фото?? Просто я каждый раз сталкиваюсь с тем, что я, человек, который кидает просто ну идеально вылизанные референсы, в итоге всё

❤‍🔥18

6 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC166 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Агата делает трейлер к новой ау, и что-то мне подсказывает, что это будет разъёб помощнее моветона

🔥31😱7❤‍🔥6

5 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC156 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ниже спойлеры по последним главам Passion for pain, так что аккуратно, но блять это лучшее пхахпхахрхахпахх

❤‍🔥27

5 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC156 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я представляла как бы Арсений из тв увидел бы пэшн. Типа "у меня муж нелюбимый, траблы с дочерью, куча пиздеца в жизни и всё в целом плохо", а ему в ответ "Понятно, а у нас земля взорвалась, мы летим на марс с роботами"

❤‍🔥30😁8

5 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC159 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

У меня оттого, что вы так часто пишете приятности, желание писать вам тонну всего всегда на 100000%, спасибо вам за это!! 🙏🏻😭

❤‍🔥30

5 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC160 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вы такие бусинки влблвбл 🥺🥺😭😭😭

❤‍🔥26🥰4

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC159 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Именно в тот момент, когда "операция" выходила, я подписалась на ваш канал. Случайно в тт увидела и думала, что почитаю пару глав, да и закончу. А оказалось нихуяяя. Я читала эту аушку до самого её конца. Это действительно был очень крутой момент времени... После неё я начала читать другие ау с канала, и получилось, что осталась тут насовсем 🥺

❤‍🔥28

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @therapy_schedar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 278,119 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“АРТ | Schеdar 🫶🏻” (@therapy_schedar), 270 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/therapy_schedar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.