Channel
@thepurifiedtruth
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,266subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001572490687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thepurifiedtruth |
| Created | 23 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thepurifiedtruth |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 1,266 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:11 | 1,269 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 1,270 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 1,270 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
145 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 137 | 94.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.45% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.69% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Daniel Haqiqatjou discusses with Hassan al-Qadri about Shia beliefs, what the leading authorities of Shia have to say about Sunnism, his perspective on the Iran war, the need for Sunni-Shia alliance, and more. Daniel also asks Hassan to clarify Shia beliefs on the preservation of the Quran, cursing the Sahaba, self-flagellation, taqiyya, etc. https://youtu.be/Z2fWQeki0hw?si=aY0NoCxJzny6wG2a
❤16🤯1
This lecture addresses the question of why Twelver Shiʿa scholarship does not accept Sunni ḥadīth literature as authoritative and explains the importance of this issue within Islamic epistemology. It outlines four central reasons for Shiʿa distrust of Sunni ḥadīth: the Sunni doctrine of the universal uprightness of the Companions and the absence of systematic scrutiny of their reliability; the historical alignment of…
❤5
{Every soul shall taste death} | Sayyid Ali Abu al-Hasan https://youtu.be/L4oJGC8qSr8?si=oVpk8GfrhuNrI6g7 Please like, share and subscribe.
❤8
The Proof of al-Ḥusayn {s} | Sayyid Ali Abu al-Hasan https://youtu.be/y6JVaxJ9kxY?si=04C90IeWX1tqXo8E Please like, share and subscribe
❤5
Are the Shiʿa Disbelievers? | Sayyid Ali Abu al-Hasan https://youtu.be/BTnpfwX32Ec?si=uzyak-N8LTvbL0SC Please like, share and subscribe.
❤6
‼️ Major Thaqalayn Update ‼️ New Upload: Kamal al-Din by Shaykh al-Saduq https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSxluJzCOnE/?igsh=MWcwYXdhOXEzZTVoaA==
❤7
Where were the Companions when al-Zahra was Attacked? | Hassan al-Qadri The question Where were the Companions when the house of Sayyidah Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ was attacked lies at the heart of one of the most critical debates raised by the opponents of the Shīʿa. https://youtu.be/3vAkixM74Yg?si=IH91Sjh37rX27V-J
❤6
What Happened to Fatima After the Prophet? | Sayyid Ali Abu al-Hasan https://youtu.be/FNxdI9DDXjY?si=MZH-pN6CwVZJ4syl Please like, share and subscribe.
❤9💔1
The Boundaries of Infallibility | Sayyid Ali Abu al-Hasan https://youtu.be/iLYK7xb3gpY?si=8VOq3lJPwY9okO0o Please like, share and subscribe.
❤5
For those interested in deeper study of Islamic history and the formation of its intellectual traditions, we highly recommend the telegram channel “Shiitic Studies” by Shaykh Ammaar Muslim: 🔗 https://t.me/shiiticstudies The channel presents concise yet insightful writings on a range of subjects, including the early development of Islamic sects, the canonisation of Shīʿī and Sunnī law, brief biographical notes on pr…
❤8
The Imami Position on God’s Attributes | Sayyid Ali Abu al-Hasan https://youtu.be/3zHdftWuZVE?feature=shared Please like, share and subscribe.
❤10
Three Aspects of Intellectual Distinction in al-Karājikī (449 AH) Abū al-Fatḥ Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b. ʿUthmān al-Karājikī (449 AH) was among the eminent figures of Imāmī theologians, and among the finest students of the two great Shaykhs: Shaykh al-Mufīd (413 AH) and al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā (436 AH). A treasury of his scholarly heritage has reached us in the fields of kalām, hadith, and polemical issues. I will mention th…
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thepurifiedtruth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 657,653 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Purified Truth - الحق المبين” (@thepurifiedtruth), 1,266 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thepurifiedtruth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.