Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПУТЬ К СВОБОДЕ

Channel

ПУТЬ К СВОБОДЕ

@thepathtothefreedom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,440subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001194732920
TypeChannel
Username@thepathtothefreedom
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thepathtothefreedom

Growth

1,4401,4461,4436 August 2026 — 1,446 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,446 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,443 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,442 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,440 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,441 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,440 subscribers6 August 202626 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,439–1,447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 15:081,440-1
23 Aug 2026, 16:371,441+1
19 Aug 2026, 16:541,440-1
16 Aug 2026, 06:361,441-1
12 Aug 2026, 12:571,442-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:211,443-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:451,446no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:511,446first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.84%
avg views ÷ 1,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total530
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC10 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17039 #Великобритания #мидазолам #убийство #принудительная_эвтаназия #политика_CoVID #бесполезные_едоки Убийства Мидазоламом: сын, который отказался сдаться в раскрытии правды – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17038 #Флорида #драгшоу #дети #решение_суда #особое_мнение #Фаучи #воспользуюсь_пятой_поправкой #аллигатор Джефф Чайлдерс ☕️ ПАРАЗИТНЫЕ РЕПТИЛИИ ☙ Среда, 5 августа 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠 – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC33 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17037 #настоящая_битва #индивидуализм #коллективизм Забудьте о левом и правом в политике, настоящая битва — между коллективизмом и индивидуализмом – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC32 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17036 #Рэнд_Пол #слушания #Сенат #Фаучи #демократы Демократы, возможно, не получили доступ к доказательствам по делу Фаучи, но они определённо оставили свои отпечатки во всём его скандале. Обвинительное откровение Рэнд Пола о Фаучи, которое все пропустили – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17035 #Рэнд_Пол #БиллГейтс #секретный_допуск #Фаучи Файл Билла Гейтса Рэнда Пола показывает допуск к вопросу и редактирование Фаучи по пандемии – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17034 #Рэнд_Пол #БиллГейтс #секретный_допуск #Фаучи Билл Гейтс имел допуск к секретной информации в федеральных агентствах США в течение 7 лет – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17033 #иск_Кэти_Фанг #редактирование #файлы #Эпштейн Министерство юстиции США доставило судье Эммету Салливану неотредактированные документы по делу Эпштейна, разрешив ему проверить обоснованность правительственных чернильных цензур.  •  Адвокаты правительства настаивают, что сокрытие информации (жертв, свидетелей) законно.  •  Чиновники признали ошибку: случайно вычёркнули email Эпштейна, что вызывает скепси

5 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC24 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17032 #камеры_наблюдения_Flock #приватность #конфиденциальность #безопасность #подглядывание_за_детьми Логи подтвердили, что вице-президент по безопасности компании Flock использовал доступ к муниципальной системе камер Dunwoody для просмотра занятий гимнастики несовершеннолетних девочек. Несмотря на наличие более 400 камер в сети, руководитель проигнорировал все остальные потоки и сосредоточился исключитель

5 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17031 #EscapeKey #Сеута #Марокко #оружие_миграционных_потоков #ЕС #пакт_о_миграции #инструменты_идентификации Сеута – Telegraph

5 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC25 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17030 #изменение_климата #поджоги #бездомные #Вэнс #курятник #WaPo Джефф Чайлдерс ☕️ ГОРЯЧИЕ ВОПРОСЫ ☙ Вторник, 4 августа 2026 ☙ года C&C NEWS 🦠 – Telegraph

4 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17029 #Луна #Фаучи Требования конгрессмена Луны о судебном преследовании Фаучи: Сравнение с нацистами: Конгрессмен от Флориды Анна Паулина Луна сравнила доктора Энтони Фаучи с нацистским доктором Йозефом Менгеле, сославшись на то, что он ссылался на 5-ю поправку во время слушаний в Сенате по поводу COVID-19. Федеральная ответственность против ответственности штата: Луна утверждала, что потенциальное федераль

4 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC26 viewsread 6 August 2026

#статья17028 #Фаучи #мертвый_свидетель #ЧжоуЮсэн Китайский исследователь, финансируемый напрямую Фаучи, был найден мёртвым при крайне подозрительных обстоятельствах. Учёный по COVID найден мёртвым за несколько дней до того, как он дал показания против программы Энтони Фаучи по сокращению населения – Telegraph

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thepathtothefreedom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 936,886 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПУТЬ К СВОБОДЕ” (@thepathtothefreedom), 1,440 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thepathtothefreedom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.