Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Теория Фактов

@theoryoffacts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,184subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002075389297
TypeChannel
Username@theoryoffacts
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/theoryoffacts

Growth

2,18412 Aug 2026, 17:32 — 2,184 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 02:54 — 2,184 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 17:3213 Aug 2026, 02:54
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,182–2,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:542,184no change
12 Aug 2026, 17:322,184first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5835.4%
👍3521.3%
🤔1710.4%
🔥127.32%
😁127.32%
🥰116.71%
👏106.10%
🤯53.05%
👌31.83%
🤓10.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Apr 2026, 14:16 UTC290 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Согласно проведенным исследованиям, люди больше предпочитают синие зубные щетки, чем красные Теория Фактов

👍3

16 Apr 2026, 11:27 UTC292 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кальций в наших костях и железо в нашей крови появились от древнего взрыва огромных звезд. Теория Фактов

👍3🤔2👌1🥰1

16 Apr 2026, 08:24 UTC261 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На картине «Оливковые деревья» Ван Гога более 120 лет находился засохший кузнечик, влипший в краску ещё при жизни художника. Теория Фактов

👍51🥰1

16 Apr 2026, 05:21 UTC275 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Римский император Веспасиан ввёл множество необычных налогов, одним из них был налог на латруны — общественные туалеты. В ответ на упреки сенаторов Веспасиан предложил им понюхать деньги, полученные по этому налогу, — так возникла знаменитая фраза «деньги не пахнут». Теория Фактов

👍42🤔1

15 Apr 2026, 14:50 UTC232 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Финляндии есть чемпионат мира по ношению жен. Это необычное соревнование, где мужчины соревнуются в переноске своих жен через полосу препятствий. Теория Фактов

🔥3🤔3👏2

15 Apr 2026, 11:36 UTC208 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Луна удаляется от Земли примерно на 3,8 сантиметра в год. Со временем это может повлиять на продолжительность дня на нашей планете. Теория Фактов

🤔4🥰4👍2

15 Apr 2026, 08:59 UTC211 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В Древнем Риме пурпурный цвет был настолько дорогим, что его могли носить только императоры и сенаторы. Краситель получали из морских раковин. Теория Фактов

6👍3👌2

15 Apr 2026, 05:43 UTC213 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Деревья общаются между собой — через корни и грибные сети под землёй передают друг другу питательные вещества и предупреждают о вредителях. Теория Фактов

👍52🔥2

13 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTC240 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

По статистике, у мужчин больше шансов быть убитыми незнакомцами на улице, а у женщин — родственниками у себя дома Теория Фактов

🤔5🔥1🤓1🤯1

13 Apr 2026, 06:01 UTC231 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Марианская впадина — это океанический жёлоб, на дне которого находится самая глубокая точка Земли. Эта точка называется Бездной Челленджера, она уходит вниз примерно на 10 994 м. Теория Фактов

2👏1🥰1

11 Apr 2026, 08:36 UTC280 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Андская кошка самая редкая и неизученная в мире. Теория Фактов

👏63🥰1

11 Apr 2026, 05:44 UTC274 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Изображение на сетчатке формируется вверх ногами, но мозг не просто меняет его ориентацию, а создаёт полное и осмысленное восприятие окружающей среды. Теория Фактов

5🔥4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @theoryoffacts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Интересные факты
@interesnie_fac · 155,202
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Теория Фактов” (@theoryoffacts), 2,184 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theoryoffacts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.