Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Теория большого стиля

Channel

Теория большого стиля

@theorybigstyle

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

79,909subscribers

-1,178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001995871723
TypeChannel
Username@theorybigstyle
DescriptionМесто хорошего вкуса и осознанного шопинга. По рекламе: @nastya_style РКН: https://clck.ru/3GXUZ9
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/theorybigstyle

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

79,90981,08780,4987 August 2026 — 81,087 subscribers8 August 2026 — 81,077 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81,060 subscribers10 August 2026 — 81,026 subscribers11 August 2026 — 81,013 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,989 subscribers13 August 2026 — 80,970 subscribers14 August 2026 — 80,941 subscribers15 August 2026 — 80,894 subscribers17 August 2026 — 80,843 subscribers18 August 2026 — 80,816 subscribers19 August 2026 — 80,787 subscribers20 August 2026 — 80,769 subscribers21 August 2026 — 80,708 subscribers22 August 2026 — 80,701 subscribers24 August 2026 — 80,639 subscribers25 August 2026 — 80,608 subscribers26 August 2026 — 80,569 subscribers27 August 2026 — 80,550 subscribers28 August 2026 — 80,575 subscribers29 August 2026 — 80,539 subscribers30 August 2026 — 80,512 subscribers31 August 2026 — 80,475 subscribers1 September 2026 — 80,463 subscribers2 September 2026 — 80,425 subscribers4 September 2026 — 80,399 subscribers6 September 2026 — 80,406 subscribers9 September 2026 — 80,326 subscribers12 September 2026 — 80,239 subscribers13 September 2026 — 80,198 subscribers15 September 2026 — 80,143 subscribers17 September 2026 — 80,120 subscribers26 September 2026 — 79,909 subscribers7 August 202626 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net -1,178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,732–81,264 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 13:2279,909-211
17 Sept 2026, 11:5680,120-23
15 Sept 2026, 10:5880,143-55
13 Sept 2026, 17:1980,198-41
12 Sept 2026, 00:0180,239-87
9 Sept 2026, 15:5580,326-80
6 Sept 2026, 10:2280,406+7
4 Sept 2026, 03:1580,399-26
2 Sept 2026, 17:2380,425-38
1 Sept 2026, 15:5880,463-12
31 Aug 2026, 14:2480,475-37
30 Aug 2026, 13:4780,512-27
29 Aug 2026, 12:5680,539-36
28 Aug 2026, 13:1780,575+25
27 Aug 2026, 16:1780,550-19
26 Aug 2026, 18:3680,569-39
25 Aug 2026, 15:0380,608-31
24 Aug 2026, 13:3980,639-62
22 Aug 2026, 19:2880,701-7
21 Aug 2026, 06:4480,708first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.52%
avg views ÷ 79,909 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,410
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held43 (3 August 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total79,400
Reactions total1,126
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 13:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,030
Videos
≈373
Links
≈749

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 20s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,818 reactions across 40 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,02036.2%
❤85030.2%
👍41514.7%
😍28510.1%
😁953.37%
👎411.45%
🤯361.28%
🤔240.852%
💯210.745%
🎉120.426%
😱80.284%
🤩80.284%
😭30.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,818 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,990 views45 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Как думаете, сено теплее пуха? Вообще задумка интересная, выглядит эффектно, в стиле Balenciaga😁 ph: zhdanoviich

🔥18🤯14😁9❤4

27 Sept 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,870 views86 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, нашла вам очень интересное кино на вечер✨ Рекомендую фильм: «Сделано в Милане»: история Армани и итальянской моды. Погружает в историю бренда и заодно знакомит с миром других легендарных домов моды🎬 Мой киновечер случился в Angleterre в «Мишель». Будете в Петербурге, надевайте всё самое красивое и бегите за атмосферой французского шика сюда. Кино показывают в оригинале с субтитрами, перед сеансом можно нас…

❤64🔥17👍4😁1

25 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,830 views26 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Многим понравился total chocolate look 🤎 Поэтому сегодня его и разбираем чтобы понять, за счёт чего образ выглядит так гармонично. В основе монохром, который собирает всё воедино, несмотря на большое количество деталей. Объёмный жакет расслабляет силуэт, лонгслив с поло создают многослойность, а шорты с плотными колготками визуально вытягивают ноги и делают переход между вещами мягким. Именно за счёт сочетания фак…

😍17❤9

23 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈4,400 views107 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Video

Рабочая рекомендация🌸 И не забываем про расположение каблучка. Надо чтобы он был посередине пятки. Остальное - неудобно. ph: neagilera

🔥59👍34😍9❤5

22 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC≈4,820 views40 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Шесть простых, но очень крутых стилизаций🤍 Учимся носить привычные вещи немного иначе: • Брошь на воротник куртки или пальто, а не на грудь • Колготки с носочками, можно даже сыграть на контрасте, идеальный приём на осень. • Два ремня вместо одного, можно соединить между собой их. • Майка поверх лонгслива. Даже самый простой образ становится интереснее • Галстук на голую шею вместо других украшений • Шарф не на шею.…

🔥32❤8

20 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC≈5,110 views62 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Сегодня выдалось несколько свободных часов, и я решила наконец-то разобрать обувь. И, конечно же, нашла несколько пар, которые вообще не ношу, но выбросить жалко! 😄 Так что планирую реанимировать любимые туфли, если у вас тоже имеется что-то на переделку, сохраняйте идеи: 🦌Оленёнок Бемби 💜Пушистики 🧜‍♀️Русалочьи 🦢Черный лебедь 💗Дофаминовые 🐆Леопард 🌸Летние 🎀Банты 🔥Татуировки А в комментариях показывайте свои перед…

🔥40❤18👍2😭2

18 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈4,870 views31 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Белые классические варианты рубашек обсудили, теперь давайте отойдём от базы 🤍 Собрала подборку вариантов, которые сами по себе могут стать акцентом за счет интересного кроя, фактуры или деталей. Они не требуют сложной стилизации, надеваем как раз с простыми вещами и любимыми джинсами👇🏻 RELASTORY VITTORIA VICCI BEFREE NUME SN STUDIO ANNA PEKUN ATME BT_EST2018 CALLIOPE

🔥15❤10😍6

17 Sept 2026, 15:25 UTC≈4,010 views36 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Белая рубашка это база большинства образов, но почему-то часто висит в шкафу годами🤍 На что обратить внимание при покупке, чтобы действительно ее носить: Ткань. Хлопок, лен или немного эластана. И обязательно проверяйте плотность, белая рубашка не должна просвечивать, если это не задумка. Крой. Прямой, самый универсальный вариант. Оверсайз, для расслабленных образов. Приталенный вариант хорош для офиса. Посадка. …

💯21❤12😍3

16 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC≈3,500 views73 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, ну вы как всегда меня приятно удивили и порадовали🥹 Спасибо каждой, кто поддержал рубрику #модныелуковки и прислал свои образы под постом! Количество ваших шикарных образов запредельное. Я пересмотрела все кучу раз и было очень сложно выбрать фотографии, потому что у каждой свои модные приемы, свой стиль и каждый образ по-своему классный ✨ Вы все большие красотки, смотрим, вдохновляемся и ставим лайки этим…

❤49👍15😍8😁1

15 Sept 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,260 views101 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Total chocolate look🤎 Ну что, начинаем день с моего любимого осеннего цвета. Глубокие оттенки шоколада сразу закрывают вопрос «а не будет ли слишком просто». Не будет! Будет дорого. Джемпер + пиджак + прямые брюки в тон, и вот уже собрали красоту. Вау, нравится сочетание -🔥 Перебор коричневого -❤️

🔥59❤41🤔1

13 Sept 2026, 17:21 UTC≈3,830 views45 reactionsread 17 September 2026
Photo

Осенью хочется разбавлять свои лучки чем-то цветным и уйти от привычного денима. Цветные джинсы как раз сделают образ интереснее, так что не бойтесь цвета. Листайте подборку, и присматривайте своих фаворитов, все до 8 000 ₽🤎 Леопард Красные Градиент Хаки Болотные Синие Выцветшие Бордовые Коричневые

🔥21👍11❤8😍5

10 Sept 2026, 15:05 UTC≈4,780 views22 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Девочки, напоминаю👇🏻 Под этим постом я жду ваши фото образов прикрепляйте их прямо в комментарии. Соберу фото и совсем скоро выложу лучшие в канале. Поэтому не стесняйтесь, присылайте всё, что хочется показать! А если сомневаетесь - тоже присылайте! Могу прокомментировать, подсказать, что можно добавить или изменить, и помочь сделать образ ещё интереснее❤️🥹

👍12❤5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @theorybigstyle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@theorybigstyle edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Теория большого стиля” (@theorybigstyle), 79,909 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theorybigstyle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.