Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Orthodox Ethos

Channel

Orthodox Ethos

@theorthodoxethos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,518subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535195595
TypeChannel
Username@theorthodoxethos
DescriptionPresenting the Orthodox Way, Truth, and Life through Orthodox Christian catechesis, following the Holy Fathers. Join us to go deeper in the Orthodox Faith ☦️👇 https://linktr.ee/OrthodoxEthos 📩 Contact us at [email protected]
Created26 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/theorthodoxethos

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,4558,5188,486.56 August 2026 — 8,483 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,479 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,478 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,480 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,486 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,485 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,469 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,455 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,456 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,466 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,465 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,477 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,482 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,487 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,508 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,505 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,502 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,509 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,510 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,505 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,490 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,477 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,474 subscribers8 November 2026 — 8,508 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,518 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 97 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,446–8,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 12:108,518+10
8 Nov 2026, 00:548,508+34
4 Nov 2026, 16:418,474-3
1 Nov 2026, 08:208,477-13
29 Oct 2026, 06:188,490-15
25 Oct 2026, 18:458,505-5
22 Oct 2026, 21:488,510+1
20 Oct 2026, 03:478,509+7
16 Oct 2026, 20:478,502-3
13 Oct 2026, 16:318,505-3
7 Oct 2026, 15:388,508+21
30 Sept 2026, 20:188,487+5
15 Sept 2026, 20:388,482+5
12 Sept 2026, 02:368,477+12
7 Sept 2026, 23:398,465-1
2 Sept 2026, 21:068,466+10
30 Aug 2026, 11:128,456+1
27 Aug 2026, 05:178,455-14
24 Aug 2026, 14:578,469-16
20 Aug 2026, 13:048,485first reading

Engagement

85 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.1%
avg views ÷ 8,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,050
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.948%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 85 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held85 (26 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total47,167
Reactions total447
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 01:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,780
Videos
≈835
Links
≈2,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 52s
Average length
1m 25s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,273 reactions across 77 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,11487.5%
😢655.11%
👏503.93%
👍443.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
562
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 78 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
500
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @theorthodoxethos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (21.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 18:06 UTC381 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Can We Prevent Apostasy? The unfortunate reality within the life of the Church is that apostasy is relatively common—and more often than not, it happens fairly early on, not long after a person's conversion. Fr. Peter and Fr. John discuss whether there are specific things the Church can do to help prevent people from making such a grave error. https://youtu.be/QwV66Oo5tuk?si=0zl0d2W9GqiPL0nM

❤6

13 Nov 2026, 03:50 UTC832 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026

SHARE SHARE SHARE Tell your clergy about this; ask the church and friends to support it. https://www.youtube.com/live/GkM2SyTJXzg?is=yL8CjtcHjtmwsMc0

❤20👏2

11 Nov 2026, 20:57 UTC986 views15 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Do We Know WHERE The Church Is? Some have stated that, "We know where the Church is, but we don't know where it isn't." Is this really true? Fr. Peter evaluates this claim to test its compatibility with Holy Orthodoxy in light of the patristic consensus and what the saints have believed/taught historically. https://youtu.be/Fvvfnn3WWpQ?si=avB9eTNZatH7KWYp

❤15

11 Nov 2026, 01:02 UTC480 views22 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Christianities The Film is moving ahead toward production and we are eager to share our news with all of you! Join Fr. Peter Heers, Neil Basil DeGraide, John Heers and Alex Sorin this Thursday at 6 PM EST / 3 PM PST for all the news and what lies ahead for this most unique and important Orthodox film! https://www.youtube.com/live/GkM2SyTJXzg?si=hjEUdCJ5RttKafVq

❤19👍2👏1

11 Nov 2026, 01:02 UTC928 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Reminder, this Thursday: 6 PM EST / 3 PM PST For all you in Mountain Time: 4 PM!

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 19:18 UTC≈1,170 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Man's Utopia Will NEVER Exist There have been many advancements in our modern age which greatly benefit mankind. However, many people have mistaken the means for the ends, believing that technology, combined with certain political ideologies, could some day create an ideal environment that will increase the longevity of human life—perhaps indefinitely—failing to recognize that any such conception of paradise without…

❤14👍1👏1

9 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,700 views21 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Christianities The Film is moving ahead toward production and we are eager to share our news with all of you! Join Fr. Peter Heers, Neil Basil DeGraide, John Heers and Alex Sorin this Thursday at 6 PM EST / 3 PM PST for all the news and what lies ahead for this most unique and important Orthodox film! https://www.youtube.com/live/GkM2SyTJXzg?si=hjEUdCJ5RttKafVq

❤21

6 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC≈10,300 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026

SOLA SCRIPTURA IS SELF-REFUTING Is the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura actually coherent? Fr. Peter explains why this widely popular teaching is actually problematic by its very nature. https://youtu.be/2V8uQ1ecOkk?si=YvqQwFfoCM5QwwpE

❤16

4 Nov 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,910 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026

THE SPIRITUAL CAUSE OF PHYSICAL TRIALS The sacred Scriptures say that all things work together for good to them that love God—there is nothing "random" or "pointless". Fr. Peter explains how all manner of trials, suffering and persecution are the means God uses to reveal man's inner state, and all have a pedagogical purpose within God's plan of salvation for man. https://youtu.be/ttGeoBaGA88?si=T3CnOodB0kPbg11q

❤14👏2

4 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,660 views42 reactionsread 14 November 2026

☦🤴🏻🇬🇷 St. King John III Doukas Vatatzes! Roman Emperor Saint John Vatatzes the Merciful, also known as John III Doukas Vatatzez or John III Vatatzes, was the Emperor of Nicaea from 1221 to 1254 and one of the most remarkable among the successors of Constantine the Great, being the chief architect of the restored Roman Empire, and a respected leader who encouraged justice, charity and a cultural blossoming. He was bo…

❤42

2 Nov 2026, 21:49 UTC≈1,580 views11 reactionsread 14 November 2026

WHY PROTESTANTS REJECT AUTHORITY Fr. Peter and Fr. John analyze how the Protestant ethos was enculturated by a westernized mentality whose development proved to be a significant departure from the prevailing customs of the entire world throughout all of history, which may have led to the subsequent aversion to certain ecclesial structures of authority that many denominations now have. https://youtu.be/Ds6hz3eDOcc?s…

❤11

2 Nov 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,450 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

ST. JOHN OF KRONSTADT ON FLOWERS, CHILDREN, AND LEARNING Love for flowers is genuine love, caring, touching, tender, almost prayerful. It speaks of a heart which has a strongly developed attraction to the pure, the untouched, the innocent. Children in a family are what lilies of the valley are in nature... READ FULL ARTICLE: https://www.orthodoxethos.com/post/st-john-of-kronstadt-on-flowers-children-and-learning

❤28

Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @theorthodoxethos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

EOTC Library
@eotcLIBRARY · 39,223
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
Orthodox Mezmur Channel ️
@Orthodox_Mezmur_For_All · 36,211
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 2 September 2026
ማህተቤን አልበጥስም የተዋህዶ ድምፅ ✝💒
@maheteben123 · 31,598
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 7 September 2026
ዲያቆን ያረጋል አበጋዝ
@yaregalabegaz · 41,541
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Orthodox Ethos” (@theorthodoxethos), 8,518 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theorthodoxethos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.