Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DeTOC

Channel

DeTOC

@theopencreator

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,415subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002119672534
TypeChannel
Username@theopencreator
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/theopencreator

Growth

1,4151,4241,419.527 August 2026 — 1,424 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,423 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,421 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,419 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,415 subscribers27 August 20266 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,414–1,425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 11:381,415-4
2 Sept 2026, 09:581,419-2
30 Aug 2026, 18:441,421-2
28 Aug 2026, 03:161,423-1
27 Aug 2026, 12:301,424first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 51s
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

614 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍31050.5%
13922.6%
🔥7111.6%
🤩6210.1%
🎉111.79%
101.63%
🐳60.977%
🕊50.814%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2024 to 28 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2024, 21:25 UTC≈1,940 views106 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @doggervillePhoto

🚚 2025 is coming. The New Year is already rushing every Pippl’s chimney. Our journey starts right now. Today, luck was on Roger's side as his seemingly endless wandering brought him to the «Doggerville» 🏠 The storyline is destined to begin at the very beginning of this year… 🎄

👍7333

17 Nov 2024, 15:18 UTC≈3,990 views180 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

https://telegram.org/blog/fullscreen-miniapps-and-more @durov with his youngest child @telegram has announced a new update «Mini Apps 2.0» 🎁 It is a very huge milestone for Telegram, as for SuperApp 📱 In nearest time most successful publishers will appear in the TMA. Big things are coming. Smth is cooking 🍳

👍119🤩4610🕊5

8 Nov 2024, 18:01 UTC≈3,500 views30 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

🔵 The Gateway 2024. How it was? Unforgettable 3 days all of events, where builders, investors and other headliners met. Dozens of intelligent people and dozens of good contacts. We would like to give special respect to the best party these days in Dubai — Halloween after party by Blum&Dogs 😄 Organisation was very cool, and every moment was remembered in its own way. Thanks to @TON Society for such a cool communi

21👍9

1 Nov 2024, 06:58 UTC≈1,590 views18 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

👋 Still in SAMe cap, but on The Gateway DeTOC, can’t be stopped.

🤩12👍6

31 Oct 2024, 10:20 UTC≈2,000 views9 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Find out DeTOC team by this cap on Telegram Builders Day & TON Gateway (Tomorrow) 🧢 Let’s build together!

👍9

22 Oct 2024, 16:27 UTC≈2,070 views27 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Video

🎮 Some thoughts about GameFi Classical Game Dev You know, that DeTOC team began its existence from building a blockchain-based, TMA-integrated game. Some things have changed since that time. For many months, new T2E&SMTH SIMILAR projects appear almost daily. And each of them offer users «TOKENs» for their attention. How many projects do you know? 10? 50? Maybe a hundred? Awful… By our own research, only around ~17

🔥1413

10 Oct 2024, 12:09 UTC≈2,960 views46 reactionsread 27 August 2026

💎 Do you own at least one TON-wallet?

45👍1

4 Oct 2024, 14:02 UTC≈3,820 views75 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

🧞‍♂️ Telegram Builders Day right before TON Gateway — DeTOC is official partner Only h🔥ttest speakers from hottest industry @notcoin, @blum, @nomis, @fanzee, TonTon Games, TON Foundation, TON Ventures, and others. We’ll discuss user acquisition, fundraising, launching successful viral projects, the future of the ecosystem, and more. Organizers: ⁃ @epicweb3, who is known for creating events for blockchain builders

👍35🔥23🎉11🐳6

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @theopencreator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DOGG TON
@doggton · 45,583
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DeTOC” (@theopencreator), 1,415 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theopencreator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.