Look familiar? It’s time for you to take action. If you want to make money, message me INSTANTLY. 5 spaces open. MUST HAVE £350 READY TO TRADE WITH. SERIOUS PEOPLE ONLY. https://t.me/theonepercent1

Channel
The One Percent 🧠
@theonepercent1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001780118965 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theonepercent1 |
| Description | TO JOIN THE GROUP CLICK THE THREE DOTS TOP RIGHT AND CLICK ‘OPEN IN BROWSER’ - MAKE SURE HAVE THE TELEGRAM APP INSTALLED. 🚫 GIRLS ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK 🚫 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theonepercent1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 7 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 11 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 158
- Videos
- 110
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 06s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,213 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 475 | 39.2% | |
| 🔥 | 366 | 30.2% | |
| 👍 | 275 | 22.7% | |
| 😱 | 77 | 6.35% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.495% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 0.412% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.33% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.247% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.165% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2023 to 5 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
❤48👍31🤯1🥰1
Home time 🫡 Which one would you rather take home? ❤️ = Urus 🔥 = Huracan
🔥73❤42
🚨 IF ANYONE WAS MESSAGING ME ON WHATSAPP PLEASE MESSAGE ME AGAIN ON THE SAME NUMBER SO WE CAN CONTINUE GETTING YOU STARTED 🚨 My phone took a swim today and now it’s damaged so I’ve lost all recent chat history! Thanks!
👍2
Fuck me 👿
❤1👏1
Not fucking around today. One of the best to do it 💰💰💰 Printing cash.
❤45🔥32👍25🏆1
GM. Almost £3000 profit already today! Take action and come join us. Have a great week!
❤40🔥35👍32😱27🏆1
READ. My view in life is this… What options do we have? Very simple. We have two. Win. Lose. If you’re hungry to make money, escape the system and succeed, take action and start winning. If you’re happy being broke and/or enslaved in the system, continue to lose. In my eyes, as black and white as it may be… they are your only options. Which option are you choosing right now? The clock is ticking.
❤45👍35🔥27💯1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥59👍45❤30😱25👏1🥰1
Friday. Get to work.
❤45👍32🥰1
Killing it this week already 💰 Well done to everyone who’s finally getting started!
❤46🔥39😱25🏆1👏1🤯1
Already £2,600 up this morning. Stop procrastinating. Take action.
❤45🔥31👍21🏆1💯1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @theonepercent1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 264,398 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The One Percent 🧠” (@theonepercent1), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theonepercent1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.