Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Now Word - Official

Channel

The Now Word - Official

@thenowword

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,667subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658089841
TypeChannel
Username@thenowword
Created1 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thenowword

Growth

1,6651,6701,667.57 August 2026 — 1,670 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,670 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,667 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,666 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,665 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,667 subscribers1,6677 August 202627 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 19 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,664–1,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 00:021,667+2
23 Aug 2026, 17:071,665-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:281,666-1
11 Aug 2026, 00:411,667-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:031,670no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:391,670first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 1,667 subscribers
Avg views / post
443
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (25 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total443
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 38s
Average length
14m 38s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

311 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15549.8%
🙏10533.8%
👍185.79%
🔥134.18%
❤‍🔥103.22%
😢61.93%
30.965%
👎10.322%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC443 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Watching tens of thousands of young military-aged men, predominantly Muslim, pouring into Spain yesterday was chilling. Some there called it an “invasion.” What does Islam call it? I published the following in December of 2015, and it remains more relevant than ever as Western leaders continue to destabilize their populations and economies. Is it deliberate? https://www.markmallett.com/blog/the-crisis-of-the-refug

8🙏6

Signed Mark Mallett

28 Jul 2026, 01:37 UTC675 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

IN her many apparitions throughout the world, the Blessed Mother has called us to "pray, pray, pray." But what does that mean? More words? I think it's something far deeper than that... https://www.markmallett.com/blog/pray-pray-pray/

🙏64

Signed Mark Mallett

9 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC990 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

As I began my prayer this morning, a wave of various emotions washed over me. It was a wave that began in the middle of the night, one filled with great anticipation, yet stocked with the unknown. We are entering into decisive times where a final sifting is taking place... https://www.markmallett.com/blog/in-these-decisive-times/

🙏124👍1

Signed Mark Mallett

8 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC902 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Were I the devil, at this moment in the Church and the world, I would do my best to discredit the priesthood, undermine the Holy Father’s authority, sow doubt in the Magisterium, and attempt to convince the faithful that they can only rely now upon their own inner instincts and private revelation. That, simply, is a recipe for deception. https://www.markmallett.com/blog/a-black-pope/

🙏13🔥21

Signed Mark Mallett

4 Jul 2026, 01:22 UTC911 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) claims they are they preserving the true Church. The Pope just excommunicated their new "bishops." Is this the "great schism" prophets have been warning about? https://www.markmallett.com/blog/a-great-schism-2/

🙏111

Signed Mark Mallett

2 Jul 2026, 19:33 UTC828 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/5h0CxCiyMIQ?si=Dnjdq2n8zD0rR_dT

9❤‍🔥53👎1

Signed Mark Mallett

1 Jul 2026, 23:06 UTC750 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Protestants say Catholics invented it. Catholics say it's essential for many to enter Heaven. What does the Bible say? https://www.markmallett.com/blog/the-hope-of-purgatory/

7🔥1

Signed Mark Mallett

26 Jun 2026, 19:45 UTC≈1,940 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S51FUcla8EQ

13

Signed Mark Mallett

25 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC828 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

How a counterfeit god is being constructed as we speak:

😢5🙏5

Signed Mark Mallett

25 Jun 2026, 17:45 UTC956 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

They're Not Just Hijacking America. They're Building a Replacement for God.

🔥81

Signed Mark Mallett

24 Jun 2026, 21:41 UTC845 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We have produced a culture in which the vulnerable and weak are being encouraged to check out and die. Physician-assisted suicide is rapidly spreading through the West... but is it right? https://www.markmallett.com/blog/hope-and-ultimate-despair/

12🙏4😢1

Signed Mark Mallett

20 Jun 2026, 20:06 UTC971 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In light of the passage of Bill C-9 and Bill C-22 in Canada, which together, can and will be used to hunt down "offensive" biblical passages in people's posts and websites, this weekend's Mass readings are timely: Jeremiah said: "I hear the whisperings of many: 'Terror on every side! Denounce! let us denounce him!' All those who were my friends are on the watch for any misstep of mine. 'Perhaps he will be trapped; t

31🙏16❤‍🔥5

Signed Mark Mallett

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thenowword. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Now Word - Official” (@thenowword), 1,667 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thenowword.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.