Взрывы и война в Москве//Полный Альбац https://www.youtube.com/v/Y_PiYdpRrmA?version=3

Channel
The New Times
@thenewtimes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
5,030subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001128127038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thenewtimes |
| Created | 19 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thenewtimes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 5,030 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 5,032 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 5,037 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 5,039 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 5,039 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.8%
- avg views ÷ 5,030 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,050
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (14 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,228 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Огонь по складам Wildberries: сокрушительный удар или укус? Что может заставить Путина прекратить убийства в Украине? Какова цена Wildberries для экономики? На что способен российский бизнес? Об этом The New Times расспрашивал известного экономиста, профессора Университета в Чикаго Константина Сонина*
Wildberries для экономики — швах или деталь?//Полный Альбац https://www.youtube.com/v/jQP15Nw-gQw?version=3
«Убытки всегда перенесут на тех, кто слабее» Об ударах по Wildberries, логике войны и ответственности российского общества The New Times поговорил с Марком Фейгиным*, известным политиком, адвокатом и популярным блогером
Марк Фейгин об ударах по складам Wildberries, о ситуации с нефтью, танкерами и проч.//Полный Альбац https://www.youtube.com/v/eT9NMnynTDg?version=3
Черный лебедь для Путина? Или пока воробышек? В России повальный дефицит бензина, неработающий интернет, банкротство гражданских предприятий, нехватка рабочей силы, истощение экономики. На что в этих обстоятельствах может пойти Путин? Какие варианты есть у путинской номенклатуры? Какие силы могут остановить диктатора? Об этом разговор NT с политиком, общественным деятелем Михаилом Ходорковским*
Черный лебедь для Путина? Или — пока воробышек//Полный Альбац https://www.youtube.com/v/s4gsjVtHYvs?version=3
Что с бензином? Почему? И чем этот кризис закончится?//Полный Альбац https://www.youtube.com/v/-CtXK0Bv6ms?version=3
Алексей Венедиктов: «В Москве сегодня так...» Способны ли массированные налеты украинских дронов на военные заводы и нефтеперерабатывающие предприятия России приблизить конец войны в Украине? Или напротив, после пожара на нефтезаводе в Капотне надо ждать эскалации? Как ощущают новые реалии москвичи? NT говорил об этом и многом другом с журналистом, бывшим главным редактором радиостанции «Эхо Москвы» Алексеем Венедик…
Алексей Венедиктов: в Москве сегодня так//Полный Альбац https://www.youtube.com/v/yjXPGAJXjuE?version=3
Подыгрывающие в темноте Существенная часть населения, не говоря уже об «элитах» Путину подыгрывают, образуя то самое «мы», от имени которого он действует, считает колумнист NT Андрей Колесников*
Марафон в поддержку политзаключенных 2026 #тынеодин. https://www.youtube.com/v/LwglWwSAtXg?version=3
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @thenewtimes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,123,504 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | The New Times |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian magazine |
| X / Twitter | @the_newtimes |
| Official site | http://newtimes.ru/ |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The New Times” (@thenewtimes), 5,030 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thenewtimes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.