Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الاختبار الوطني اللغة الانكليزية مع ضياء

Channel

الاختبار الوطني اللغة الانكليزية مع ضياء

@thenationalenglish100

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

17,905subscribers

+1,391 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002841169226
TypeChannel
Username@thenationalenglish100
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thenationalenglish100

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,51417,90517,209.513 August 2026 — 16,514 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,565 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,602 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,609 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,620 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,631 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,635 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,633 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,612 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,778 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,780 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,814 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,897 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,992 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,023 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,110 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,150 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,209 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,274 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,326 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,442 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,561 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,626 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,652 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,781 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,905 subscribers13 August 202618 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 36 days, net +1,391. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,305–18,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:5817,905+124
16 Sept 2026, 05:4017,781+129
14 Sept 2026, 13:0117,652+26
12 Sept 2026, 23:5917,626+65
11 Sept 2026, 02:2017,561+119
8 Sept 2026, 02:5717,442+116
4 Sept 2026, 23:3717,326+52
3 Sept 2026, 08:1717,274+65
2 Sept 2026, 02:0517,209+59
1 Sept 2026, 04:0717,150+40
31 Aug 2026, 05:1217,110+87
30 Aug 2026, 03:2517,023+31
29 Aug 2026, 00:1416,992+95
27 Aug 2026, 21:5416,897+83
26 Aug 2026, 18:2716,814+34
25 Aug 2026, 19:1916,780+2
24 Aug 2026, 21:2416,778+166
23 Aug 2026, 08:5516,612-21
21 Aug 2026, 22:0516,633-2
20 Aug 2026, 14:4716,635first reading

Engagement

182 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.80%
avg views ÷ 17,905 subscribers
Avg views / post
501
130 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
130
of 182 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 89 of 130 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held182 (29 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total65,162
Reactions total454
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

646 reactions across 122 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41063.5%
👍9715.0%
😭274.18%
👌243.72%
❤‍🔥233.56%
🙏223.41%
🤷‍♀142.17%
🤣71.08%
🤷60.929%
👀50.774%
🕊40.619%
🌚20.31%
😁20.31%
🏆10.155%
🔥10.155%
🤷‍♂10.155%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 182 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC548 viewsread 3 September 2026

تخفيض خاص ومؤقت تخفيض هائل على دوراتنا الوطنية المشهورة بالعراق ( اللغة الإنكليزية - اللغة العربية- الحاسوب ) الملازم ومنهج الاختبارات الوطنية محدثة 2027 للحجز والاستفسار :👇👇👇 @Dihaa https://t.me/Dihaa

2 Sept 2026, 13:24 UTC572 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

شدّوا حيلكم، الجاي أصعب وأدق 💪🏻🔥 🎯 ركّزوا على التفاصيل؛ بعض الأسئلة بيها فخاخ امتحانية. لا تستعجلون بالإجابة… فكّروا بالقواعد أولاً! 🧠✨ بالتوفيق لأبطال الاختبار الوطني 🌟 شاركوا الأسئلة حتى الكل يستفاد 🤍📚

🙏2

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC556 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

The final decision _ by the committee next week.

  1. makes9%
  2. is making15%
  3. will be made70%
  4. has made6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC488 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

If the weather _ better tomorrow, we will go hiking.

  1. was14%
  2. is38%
  3. had been26%
  4. would be21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC456 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

She said, “I can’t attend the meeting.”

  1. She said that she can't attend the meeting.21%
  2. She said that she couldn't attend the meeting.40%
  3. She said that I couldn't attend the meeting.24%
  4. She said that she hadn't attended the meeting.15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC438 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

The teacher said, “Open your books.”

  1. The teacher said us to open our books.29%
  2. The teacher told us to open our books.31%
  3. The teacher told that we opened our books.21%
  4. The teacher asked us opening our books.19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC293 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

He said to me, “Can you help me?”

  1. He said to me if I can help him.21%
  2. He asked me if I could help him.37%
  3. He told me if I could help him.25%
  4. He asked me can I help him.17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2😭1

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC287 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Mona said, “I bought this book yesterday.”

  1. Mona said that she bought this book yesterday.32%
  2. Mona said that she had bought that book the day before.38%
  3. Mona said that I had bought that book yesterday.18%
  4. Mona said that she has bought this book tomorrow.12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

2 Sept 2026, 13:21 UTC280 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Ali said, “I am studying English.”

  1. Ali said that I am studying English.8%
  2. Ali said that he was studying English.55%
  3. Ali said that he is studying English.22%
  4. Ali said that he had studied English.15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC279 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

If she had taken the earlier flight, she _ on time.

  1. will arrive16%
  2. would arrive10%
  3. would have arrived60%
  4. arrives13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC254 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

If I _ you, I wouldn't make that decision.

  1. am9%
  2. were55%
  3. will be14%
  4. have been22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

2 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC252 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

If he studies hard, he _ the exam.

  1. would pass9%
  2. will pass60%
  3. would have passed21%
  4. had passed9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 182 posts we hold for @thenationalenglish100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 111 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz122 voters

The final decision _ by the committee next week.

  1. makes9%
  2. is making15%
  3. will be made70%
  4. has made6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz117 voters

If the weather _ better tomorrow, we will go hiking.

  1. was14%
  2. is38%
  3. had been26%
  4. would be21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz108 voters

She said, “I can’t attend the meeting.”

  1. She said that she can't attend the meeting.21%
  2. She said that she couldn't attend the meeting.40%
  3. She said that I couldn't attend the meeting.24%
  4. She said that she hadn't attended the meeting.15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz102 voters

The teacher said, “Open your books.”

  1. The teacher said us to open our books.29%
  2. The teacher told us to open our books.31%
  3. The teacher told that we opened our books.21%
  4. The teacher asked us opening our books.19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz102 voters

He said to me, “Can you help me?”

  1. He said to me if I can help him.21%
  2. He asked me if I could help him.37%
  3. He told me if I could help him.25%
  4. He asked me can I help him.17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz94 voters

Mona said, “I bought this book yesterday.”

  1. Mona said that she bought this book yesterday.32%
  2. Mona said that she had bought that book the day before.38%
  3. Mona said that I had bought that book yesterday.18%
  4. Mona said that she has bought this book tomorrow.12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 182 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الاختبار الوطني اللغة الانكليزية مع ضياء” (@thenationalenglish100), 17,905 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thenationalenglish100.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.