8 measurements spanning 17 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,349–3,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 15:47
3,380
+9
21 Aug 2026, 05:57
3,371
+3
17 Aug 2026, 23:59
3,368
+6
14 Aug 2026, 16:07
3,362
+4
11 Aug 2026, 06:47
3,358
+4
8 Aug 2026, 15:10
3,354
+1
7 Aug 2026, 19:02
3,353
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:54
3,353
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 3,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
350
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.286%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
20 (20 April 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
350
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
36
75.0%
👍
11
22.9%
🔥
1
2.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 17-Week LRDI Preparation Plan
🔹 Phase 1 – Week 3
Pick your Squad, Count your Circles
Before starting this week's tasks, make sure you have completed Week 1 and Week 2. If not, finish them first and then move to Week 3.
📚 Tasks :
✅ Complete Selection
• Set 4
• Set 5
• Set 6
✅ Watch Set Theory
• Concept Video 1
• Concept Video 2
• Concept Video 3
✅ Complete Set Theory
• Set 1
• Set 2
• Set 3
• Set 4
• Set 5
🎯 …
📢 17-Week LRDI Preparation Plan
🔹 _Phase 1 – Week 2_
(advanced LR + Constraints Mastery)
Before starting this week's tasks, make sure you have completed Week 1 (LRDI Orientation + LR Taxonomy). If not, finish it first and then move to Week 2.
🎥 Watch: • Knockout Tournament – Concept Video
• Round Robin Tournament – Concept Video
• Binary Logic – Concept Video
🧩 Solve:
Games & Tournaments
• Set 1
• Set 2
• Set 3
• …
THE LRDI MASTER pinned «📢 133 Days to CAT 2026 — Let's Use Them Properly 🎯 From this week, I am starting a 17-Week LRDI Preparation Plan on this channel. Starting right from Week 1. Every week, I will share a clear roadmap of what you should be doing for LRDI at this stage of your…»
📢 17-Week LRDI Preparation Plan Begins Now
If you're starting now, don't worry. I will provide a 17-week preparation plan, week by week.
The plan is divided into 4 phases (approximately 1 month each) and is designed to take you from basics to CAT-level LRDI.
This is your last chance to start your LRDI preparation seriously.🚀
Phase 1 – Week 1
📌 LRDI Orientation + LR Taxonomy
Tasks :
Watch Orientation and Arrange…
📢 133 Days to CAT 2026 — Let's Use Them Properly 🎯
From this week, I am starting a 17-Week LRDI Preparation Plan on this channel.
Starting right from Week 1.
Every week, I will share a clear roadmap of what you should be doing for LRDI at this stage of your preparation — topics to cover, type of sets to practise, sectionals, mocks and weekly targets.
Even if you are not enrolled in THE LRDI MASTER, you can follow the…
🚨 CAT LRDI Practice Set
Difficulty: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆
If you can solve this set comfortably within 15 minutes, you're on the right track for CAT.
No calculator. No hints. Just pure logic.
Can you crack this Bar Graph based LRDI set? 🤯
⏱️ Time Limit: 15 minutes
Drop your answers in the comments 👇
#CAT2026 #CATPreparation #LRDI #DILR #CATPuzzle #LogicalReasoning #DataInterpretation #MBAEntrance #TheLRDIMaster #DailyCATChallenge
📊 Bar Graph Puzzle Challenge
Only differences in marks are given. Jaggu scored the least.
⏱️ CAT LRDI | Try in 12 minutes
🌐 cat.thelrdimaster.in
#TheLRDIMaster #CAT2026 #LRDI #DI #DailyPuzzle
📚THE LRDI MASTER RC BANK
72 Reading Comprehensions
✅ CAT-level RCs
✅ Diverse topics & genres
✅ Ideal for daily VARC practice
✅ Improve reading speed, comprehension & accuracy
If you struggle with RCs, the solution isn't more theory—it's more reading.
🔥 Start solving. Start improving.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thelrdimaster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MBA Pathshala @mba_pathshala · 62,381 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“THE LRDI MASTER” (@thelrdimaster), 3,380 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thelrdimaster.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
