زندگی را در کل ارزشمند میبینی یا فاقد ارزش؟ #تو_بگو
- ➕ارزشمند67%
- ➖فاقد ارزش33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@thelibraryofknowledge
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
63subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 15 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004296898706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thelibraryofknowledge |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thelibraryofknowledge |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 63 | +26 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 00:22 | 37 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 September 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 721 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Oct 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
21 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 85.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
زندگی را در کل ارزشمند میبینی یا فاقد ارزش؟ #تو_بگو
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
درود خدمت مخاطبان و همراهان همیشگی و در درسترس قفسه آگاهی قفسهای که هنوز خیلی کوچیکه اما همین تعداد اندک اعضای خودش رو خیلی دوس داره قراره یه بخش جدید به ساختار قفسه اضافه کنیم: ۱-بخش «#تو_بگو»:در این بخش ما سوالی مطرح میکنیم و از شما جواب میخواهیم،اینگونه میتوانیم با هم نظراتمون به اشتراک بزاریم،حالا در ادامه قا سبک و سیاق سوالاتمون آشنا خواهید شد. ۲- بخش «#یادداشت_های_قفسه»:در این بخش من بیشتر قراره صحبت کنم،شاید…
با زخم بايد ساخت. طول ميكشه، ولي خوب ميشه سگ کشی-بهرام بیضایی #تیکه_کتاب @thelibraryofknowledge
پادکست «مثنوی خوانی» اين بار مولانا را نخوانيم، بلكه بفهميم مثنوي را بيت به بيت گوش كنيم و پيام مولانا را با زبان ساده دريابيم گر شدی عطشان بحر معنوی فرجهای کن در جزیرهی مثنوی سری بعد از سری پادکست های معرفی شده،سری پادکست های «مثنوی خوانی» هستش؛برای شنیدن این مجموعه پادکست میتونید عنوان «مثنوی خوانی» رو در کست باکس سرچ کنید و قسمت های مختلف اون رو بشنوید. #پادکست @thelibraryofknowledge
#موسیقی @thelibraryofknowledge
👍1
🎥 The Count of Monte Cristo | 2024 🎬 کنت مونتهکریستو؛ وقتی قربانی، قاضی میشود فیلم کنت مونتهکریستو (۲۰۲۴)، اقتباسی از رمان مشهور الکساندر دوما، داستان ادموند دانتس، دریانورد جوانی است که قربانی توطئه و بیعدالتی میشود. او پس از سالها زندان، با هویتی تازه و ثروتی عظیم بازمیگردد تا از کسانی که زندگیاش را نابود کردهاند انتقام بگیرد. اما پشت این داستان پرکشش، پرسشی عمیق پنهان است: آیا کسی که قربانی بیعدالتی شد…
👍1
اما، ای دوست، ما دیر آمدهایم. راست است که ایزدان زندهاند، اما بر فرازمان، بالا در دنیایی گونهگون. آنان در آن فرازگاه وظیفهای بیپایان به عهده دارند، و گویی کمی نگرانند که زندهایم آیا یا مرده، بسیار از ما میپرهیزند. جام سست همواره نمیتواند آنان را در برگیرد؛ آدمیان تنها گاهی میتوانند غنای ایزدان را برتابند. بنابراین زندگی خود رؤیایی دربارهی آنها میشود.اما سرگشتگی و خواب یاریمان میرساند: پریشانی و شبانه نیر…
👍1
جنگ عقاید؛ آیا انسان بدون امید میتواند زندگی کند؟ 1. آیا امید یک ضرورت است یا یک انتخاب؟ 2. آیا امید همیشه ارزشمند است؟ 3. اگر امید را از انسان بگیریم، چه چیزی باقی میماند؟ #جنگ_عقاید @thelibraryofknowledge
👍1
جبهه اول: بدون امید، ادامهدادن دشوار است؛ «ویکتور فرانکل؛ انسان در جستوجوی معنا» از این منظر، انسان برای تحمل رنج به چیزی فراتر از وضعیت فعلیاش نیاز دارد؛ معنایی که هنوز محقق نشده، امکانی که هنوز از میان نرفته یا دلیلی که ادامهدادن را ارزشمند میکند. امید لزوماً به معنای اطمینان از پیروزی نیست. ممکن است کسی بداند که شکست محتمل است، اما همچنان برای چیزی تلاش کند که آن را ارزشمند میداند. در این نگاه، امید میتوا…
👍1
جبهه دوم: شاید بتوان بدون امید هم زندگی کرد؛ آلبر کامو؛ اسطوره سیزیف کامو ما را با پرسشی دشوار روبهرو میکند: اگر جهان هیچ تضمینی برای خوشبختی، عدالت یا رسیدن به خواستههای ما نمیدهد، آیا باز هم میتوان زندگی کرد؟ در فلسفه ابزورد کامو، انسان میتواند بدون پناهبردن به وعدهای درباره آینده، پوچی و بیتضمینی جهان را بپذیرد و همچنان زندگی کند. از این منظر، شاید لازم نباشد به بهترشدن اوضاع امیدوار باشیم تا برای زیستن…
👍1
مرگ یزدگرد «مرگ یزدگرد» نمایشنامهای است که بیضایی در ۱۳۵۴ نوشت و بعدها (۱۳۷۹) خودش آن را فیلم کرد. ماجرا دربارهٔ مرگ یزدگرد سوم، آخرین شاه ساسانی، در آسیابی نزدیک مرو است. آسیابان و همسرش و دختر و یک میرزا (کاتب) هر کدام روایتی از قتل شاه میگویند؛ روایتها با هم نمیخوانند و هر کس حقیقت را به سود خودش تغییر میدهد. درونمایه: نمایشنامه نشان میدهد تاریخ چگونه ساخته میشود و چرا هیچ روایتی یکسره بیطرف نیست. بحث اص…
👍1
زن: چون هشت گونه بادی که از کوه و دامنه و از جنگل و دشت و از دریا و رود و از ریگزار و بیابان میرسد، در میان این توفان ایستاده منم. کشنده پادشاه را نه اینجا، بیرون از اینجا بیابید! پادشاه پیش از این بهدست پادشاه کشته شده بود. آنکه اینجا آمد، مردکی بود ناتوان ! مرگ یزدگرد-بهرام بیضایی #تیکه_کتاب @thelibraryofknowledge
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thelibraryofknowledge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
زندگی را در کل ارزشمند میبینی یا فاقد ارزش؟ #تو_بگو
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قفسه آگاهی 📚” (@thelibraryofknowledge), 63 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thelibraryofknowledge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.