Channel
@theislamicreminders
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,205subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001198891076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theislamicreminders |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theislamicreminders |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 1,205 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 1,206 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 1,207 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 1,207 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 448 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What Is the Ruling on a Woman Who Does Not Perform Ghusl from Janābah While Knowing That Ghusl Is Obligatory? Question: What is the ruling regarding a woman who does not perform ghusl from janābah (major ritual impurity), while she knows that ghusl is obligatory? The Imām and Muḥaddith, Muqbil ibn Hādī al-Wādiʿī (may Allah have mercy upon him), answered: She is considered sinful, and she has committed something pr…
Photo, posted without a caption
Intention Is Not a Condition for Prohibited Imitation Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Here is an issue that causes confusion for some women, and for some people generally: a person does something that involves imitation and says, “I did not intend it; I did not intend to imitate them.” It is said in response: Imitation is an outward appearance. Whenever that outward res…
Photo, posted without a caption
If You See That the Worldly Life Has Filled Your Heart, Then Take Heed Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: Among the forms of shirk—and this too is subtle—is that the worldly life takes hold of a person’s very core and mind. You then find that his intellect, thoughts, body, sleep, and wakefulness are all consumed by the worldly life: what did he earn today, and what did he l…
Photo, posted without a caption
Is Every Believer Granted Success in Repenting? Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: If someone asks: Is every believer granted success in repenting? The answer is: No. Were every believer inevitably granted success in repenting, then every believer would die free from sin, and this is not the case. Rather, among the people are those who are granted success in repenting; o…
Photo, posted without a caption
Abu Ayyub Ansari reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: "If you were not to commit sins, Allah would have swept you out of existence and would have brought forth a people who would sin, and then seek forgiveness from Allah, and He would forgive them." 📜 Sahih Muslim 2748b
Photo, posted without a caption
𝐈𝐟 𝐚 𝐇𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐃𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 ʿAbdullah ibn ʿAmr said, “If a man from Hell were brought out to the dunyā, everyone in it would die due to his hideous appearance and [unbearable] stench.” Then he started crying uncontrollably. Ar-Riqqatu wal-Bukāʾ, no. 104 🖇 giftsofKnowledge.net
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @theislamicreminders. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Islamic knowledge” (@theislamicreminders), 1,205 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theislamicreminders.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.