This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,180–6,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 19:08
6,184
-10
12 Aug 2026, 17:44
6,194
-5
9 Aug 2026, 19:02
6,199
-13
6 Aug 2026, 20:20
6,212
-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:40
6,213
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:39
6,213
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 5 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
57s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
638 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
603
94.5%
💔
35
5.49%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 638reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @theindigostuffchannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 January 2026 to 3 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Йоу.
Пока мы экспериментируем. Пока ищем себя, свой дух, свою целостность. Пока собираем заново ДНК INDIGO STUFF уже в Лондоне. Пока разбираемся со своими травмами, ошибками, сомнениями и пытаемся создать что-то действительно наше — настоящее и уникальное.
Напоминаем, что сейчас на сайте огромная распродажа.
Это последние вещи. Это кусочки истории INDIGO STUFF, после которых начинается новая глава.
Ждём вашей под…
Йо! Мы возвращаемся в строй 🙌🏻⚡️
www.theindigostuff.com
НАПОМИНАЕМ о TOTAL SALE!
ВСЁ, что сейчас на сайте – НИКОГДА больше не повторится 🥲 Ушла эпоха..
TOTAL SALE в INDIGO STUFF
Устроили тотальный сейл на сайте.
Эти вещи больше не вернутся, так что если давно смотрели и думали «ну потом» — кажется, потом наступило.
Залетайте! ❤️
www.theindigostuff.com
Йо! Мы снова тут.
Немного пропали — делали вид, что не забыли пароли от соцсетей.
В честь возвращения выложили на сайт наши фирменные бланковые худи по специальной цене.
www.theindigostuff.com
Лавбомбинг (love bombing) — это форма психологической манипуляции, при которой, особенно в самом начале отношений, один человек буквально «засыпает» другого чрезмерным вниманием, комплиментами, подарками, бурной привязанностью и громкими обещаниями о будущем, чтобы быстро сформировать эмоциональную привязанность или зависимость.
После того как доверие установлено, эта интенсивная «любовь» часто резко уменьшается или…
ПМ – 10 лет.
Поздравляем! Это только начало. До пенсии ещё каких-то лет 50, поэтому ждём новой музыки и любых других новых творческих свершений.
По этому поводу кое что можно найти со специальной цене на нашем сайте:
www.theindigostuff.com
Йооо! 🥂✨
Как встретили Новый год: на чиле, в угаре или всё ещё отходите? 😅
Если читаете — значит, выжили 😎
Делитесь вайбом в комментах 👇
А вот как это выглядело у нас 👀📸
❤🔥71
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @theindigostuffchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 263,664 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INDIGO STUFF” (@theindigostuffchannel), 6,184 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theindigostuffchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.