Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

the grinding machine

@thegrindingmachine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,891subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001979591078
TypeChannel
Username@thegrindingmachine
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thegrindingmachine

Growth

2,8872,8912,8896 August 2026 — 2,887 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,887 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,891 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,886–2,892 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:142,891+4
7 Aug 2026, 05:272,887no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:182,887first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.7%
avg views ÷ 2,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.659%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total28,060
Reactions total185
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 41s
Average length
2m 51s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

185 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍17795.7%
👎84.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
52
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thegrindingmachine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈1,060 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

За неделю Robinhood начал зарабатывать больше на prediction markets, чем на акциях. Prediction markets теперь перспективнее, чем акции? @thegrindingmachine

👍6👎1

5 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC≈1,520 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Для HIP-3 вышло обновление, в котором в HIP-3 рынках можно определять комиссию отдельно под каждый актив. В это же время pump.fun добавил hyperliquid сабдомен, и последнее обновление очень совпадает с идеей Perps-backed токенов или своей Perp площадки на базе Builder Code. @thegrindingmachine

👍8

31 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,860 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В мейнстрим prediction markets как полноценная финансовая индустрия со своими правилами и лидерами вошла в октябре 2024 года, если брать как точку отсчета судебный процесс Kalshi против CFTC, который узаконил торговлю событииными контрактами в США. Вроде бы 2 года с копейками, но revenue Robinhood от prediction markets превзойдет выручку от торговли криптовалютами во 2-м квартале и в 2026–2027 финансовом году. На эт

👍8

31 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,590 views13 reactions51 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Последний гость threadguy - Flood, о том, как Citadel могли повлиять на Situational Awareness: Если я покупаю дом, я не буду расхваливать его плюсы. Я скажу, что слышал стрельбу в этом районе, что забор сломан, что тут могут быть проблемы с фундаментом. Ты говоришь всё что угодно, лишь бы сбить цену. Точно так же поступил Акман - плакался на CNBC о том, каким катастрофическим будет ковид, пока сам закрывал шорты и п

👍13

30 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,610 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы хотите знать как выглядят настоящие финансы? Тогда смотрите... Есть такой известный инвестор Леопольд Ашенбреннер. Это бывший исследователь безопасности ИИ в OpenAI, автор известного манифеста о скором появлении общего искусственного интеллекта (AGI) и основатель технологического хедж-фонда Situational Awareness LP. Situational Awareness управлял активами на сумму около $20B (некоторые источники оценивали пико

👍30

30 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,180 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы пользуетесь Hyperliquid — вам это нужно. hl.eco выпустили один из лучших дашбордов на HL. Мне больше всего понравилась новая функция Hyperliquid Financials. Revenue, откуда оно поступает, кто и сколько платит Priority Fees, обзор Builder Code, работа программы AQAv2, экономика Trade XYZ, взаимодействие с DAT, развитие HIP-4 и т.д. Еще самому можно подергать ползунки, автоматически посчитать математику при

👍13

29 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈1,620 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Kaito анонсировал выход новой InfoFi системы и обновление старых механик. Партнерство с Twitter, без комиссии для TGE проектов, плата за value (клики, регистрации) и тому подобное. В целом все эти обновления для крипто-проектов мне абсолютно по боку. Сейчас выходят мало проектов и чаще всего плохо, поэтому эти апдейты абсолютно бесполезны в текущей рыночной ситуации. По-настоящему интересно выглядят только два пун

👍6

27 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC≈1,610 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Реальная причина закрытия BitMEX Для меня BitMEX и подобные старые биржи, существовавшие с бородатых времен, были просто пережитком прошлого. Объемов на них нет, они в каких-то скандалах, вечная реструктуризация команд и смена юрисдикций, чтобы зарабатывать хоть какие-то деньги и выходить в плюс. Максимум для чего можно использовать такую платформу - арбитраж. Часто на них есть контракты на какие-то токены, котор

👍20

25 Jul 2026, 13:15 UTC≈2,300 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hyperliquid впервые за всю историю своего существования сгенерировал больше объема на RWA активах, чем в криптовалютных парах. RWA занял 54% от общего объема площадки. Кстати, только RWA в доле HL бьет своих конкурентов. В данный момент Trade XYZ зависим от Hyperliquid. > База пользователей > Ликвидность > Hypercore (движок для торгов) Сейчас у команды XYZ нет какой-то большой мотивации уходить на другой чейн

👍13👎2

23 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,070 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне не верилось, что у какой-то команды получится скрестить реальные активы с какими-то спекуляционными нарративами, чтобы реальный актив получал value от этих спекуляций. Это практически идеально удалось сделать у L()ng на Robinhood. И теперь более 50% всего объема токенизированных акций приходится именно на пары с мемкоинами, а $AI токен от L()ng стал крупнейшим источником этого объема. Большинство токенов торгу

👍12

21 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC≈1,970 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вдобавок к прошлому посту о Crypto VC и tech фондах, нашел интересный клип Haseeb (Managing Partner DragonFly) о конце Crypto VC к 2030 году. Haseeb считает, что традиционная модель crypto VC в её текущем виде исчезнет к 2030 году. Крипта не исчезнет - она станет инфраструктурой внутри традиционного fintech и финансов. А VC в привычном смысле (фонды, которые активно инвестируют в ранние speculative проекты, токены,

👍8

20 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC≈2,110 views18 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Polymarket официально запустил Polymarket Institutional. Это направление занимается ресерчем, поиском возможностей на рынках и анализом данных с рынков. Буквально только что релизнули материал. Первая статья об Strait of Hormuz, торговой идее по этому маркету. Думаю, они будут создавать много интересного контента в дальнейшем. @thegrindingmachine

👍17👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @thegrindingmachine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 59,680 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“the grinding machine” (@thegrindingmachine), 2,891 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thegrindingmachine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.