شمكعدكم @fogxdd

Channel
حيدر العظمة.
@thegreat_haider
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,755subscribers
-40 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001322430476 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thegreat_haider |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thegreat_haider |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 7,755 | -23 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 7,778 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 7,796 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 7,795 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 25 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.33%
- avg views ÷ 7,755 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 103
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (25 April 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 103 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 10
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 6
- of 21 we hold a reading for · 29%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thegreat_haider. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
ستظلُّ كلُّ الأماكنِ فارغة… ولو ازدحمت بالبشر. لأنك حين غادرت، أخذت معك هندسةَ المعنى، وتركت الجدرانَ تتكئ على بعضها خشيةَ السقوط. حتى المقهى الذي كان يعرف اسمي، صار يقدّم الكراسي كما تُقدَّم النعوش: بخشبٍ مصقول، وروحٍ مكسورة. صرتُ كلما فتحتُ بابًا، خرج منه الصدى… كأن البيوت بعدك تحولت إلى قواقع تتذكّر البحر ولا تعرف كيف تعود إليه. - حيدر العظمة
ادعو للأخ حيدر بالشفاء تعرض لحادث
تارة يكون فيّ من اليأس ما يغذي رغبتي بالاندثار وتارة اخرى تشع مني الحياة وكل ما تلمسه اصابعي يتوهج.
مثّلتُ أنَّ الحياةَ بعدكِ طبيعية… ها أنا أتنفّسُ، وأمضغُ خبزي بهدوء، وأشاهدُ الأفلامَ حتى نهايتها، وأضحكُ في المواضعِ التي يجب أن يُضحكَ فيها الناس. لكنّي، في كلِّ لقطةِ وداعٍ، ألتفتُ إليكِ. وفي كلِّ قبلةٍ على الشاشة، أشعرُ أنّ العالمَ يسرقُ شيئًا من فمي. وفي كلِّ نهايةٍ سعيدة، أُطفئُ الفيلمَ قبل أن تنتهي، كأنّي أعاقبُ الحياةَ لأنّها نجحتْ مع غيري وفشلتْ معكِ أنّني منذ رحيلكِ أمارسُ الحياةَ كما يمارسُ الميّتُ ابت…
حين ماتت الشمس لم ينتبه أحد. استمرت المدن تُشغِّل مصابيحها بثقة، وتبيعُ المرايا للغرباء، بينما كان الضوءُ الأخير يختنقُ تحت أظافر الغروب. وحده الظلُّ عرفَ الحقيقة، لذلك صار أطولَ من الجميع. - حيدر العظمة
File, posted without a caption
آنة أجيتك صاد وجهي اعلة الانام ومن اجيسك انت عن وجهي تصد! آنة أجيتك عالگ العشرة شوگ وانت بعدك عالك العشرة بعِد؟ هم توّد لو اصيرن آنة غير ؟ غراب كلبك حيل ناوي علة الحقد؟! آنة زلمة ولو عزم عزمه خيل ما ترده ضباع ديرة لو يهِد زلمة اجلد من صخر لاچن يسيح لو نسيمك داعبن شعرة بجلد مو معزب انت وما ترهم محب رافع بايدك نبل وجيت شايلك ورد؟ - حيدر العظمة
File, posted without a caption
شلون افسرك انت طلسم والطلاسم ما يفككها الخبل ! آنة جيتك واهن محسّب اعيش وبچلمة منك لَنّي مچفي ومنچتل عقلي يعرف انت اعوج مو صحيح ومن اشوفك مني يتبرى العقل حظي ليل وحظك جنيّح حمام وحيل صعبة حظنا يلمه الشمل مرني فشكة مرني اظفر ،صدري جامح وما يشبعه مرور الخَجِل - حيدر العظمة
كلُّ ما لمستهُ تحوّل إلى ذكرى، وكلُّ ما أحببتهُ تحوّل إلى درسٍ قاسٍ في التشريح. كأنّ اللهَ وضع قلبي على طاولة العالم، وقال للمارّة: تفضّلوا… هذا العضوُ لا يتعلّم. - حيدر العظمة
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @thegreat_haider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 671,140 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JPJJJJ · 93,982
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
@smr120h · 107,600
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حيدر العظمة.” (@thegreat_haider), 7,755 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thegreat_haider.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.