Channel

IELTS WITH FURQATJON 8.5

@thefurqatielts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,679subscribers

-58 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001393308740
Type	Channel
Username	@thefurqatielts
Created	Between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	12 August 2026
Last confirmed live	16 September 2026
Measurements held	12
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/thefurqatielts

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12 measurements spanning 36 days, net -58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,670–1,746 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
16 Sept 2026, 21:20	1,679	-4
13 Sept 2026, 02:40	1,683	-8
9 Sept 2026, 03:57	1,691	-8
3 Sept 2026, 17:39	1,699	-5
30 Aug 2026, 23:23	1,704	-6
28 Aug 2026, 09:16	1,710	-6
25 Aug 2026, 10:22	1,716	-6
22 Aug 2026, 03:44	1,722	-5
19 Aug 2026, 06:19	1,727	-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:16	1,731	-6
12 Aug 2026, 11:54	1,737	no change
12 Aug 2026, 08:31	1,737	first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	16	53.3%
👏	13	43.3%
❤‍🔥	1	3.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2025 to 13 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Feb 2025, 10:33 UTC≈2,400 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

7️⃣🔤5️⃣ Ivan successfully completed our latest intensive group and achieved an impressive 7.5 overall, including a remarkable 9.0 in Listening. However, his 6.5 in Writing and Speaking feels unfair—he deserved better. The examiners didn’t do him justice. 🎧 LISTENING - 9.0 📖 READING - 7.0 ✍️ WRITING - 6.5 🗣️ SPEAKING - 6.5 Overall: 7.5 Teachers: Furqat Olimjonov (@ielts_cream) and Sirojiddin Erkaboyev (@siroj_notes…

👏6👍5

Signed Furkatjon

13 Feb 2025, 10:33 UTC≈1,230 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Mahliyo studied in Furqat Olimjonov's standard group and got an overall 7.0. 🎧 LISTENING - 7.0 📖 READING - 7.5 ✍️ WRITING - 6.0 🗣️ SPEAKING - 6.5 Teacher: Furqat Olimjonov (@ielts_cream) Ingliz tilini o'rganing va siz ham IELTS dan o'quvchilarimizdek yuqori ball oling. Qishki barcha guruhlar uchun qabul ochiq ⤵️ 📩 @diyorbeksielts_admin 📩 @diyorbeksielts_yunusobod

👍1

Signed Furkatjon

13 Feb 2025, 10:33 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

7️⃣🔤🔤 Jahongor finished my 3-month standard group and got an overall 7.0, with an 8.0 in Listening and Reading. 🎧 LISTENING - 8.0 📖 READING - 8.0 ✍️ WRITING - 6.0 🗣️ SPEAKING - 6.5 Teacher: Furqat Olimjonov (@ielts_cream) Ingliz tilini o'rganing va siz ham IELTS dan o'quvchilarimizdek yuqori ball oling. Qishki barcha guruhlar uchun qabul ochiq ⤵️ 📩 @diyorbeksielts_admin 📩 @diyorbeksielts_yunusobod

👍1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC≈1,550 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

7️⃣🔤🔤 Faxriddin avgust oyida mening ONLINE READING kursimga qo‘shilgan edi va dekabr oyida test topshirib, ajoyib natijaga erishdi. Reading kurs unga o‘z ballarini 6.0 dan 7.0 ga ko‘tarishga yordam berdi. Siz ham reading natijangizni oshirmoqchi bo'lsangiz hozirda davom etayotgan IELTS READING kursimizga qo'shilishingiz mumkin.

👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC800 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Egamberdi studied in Furqat Olimjonov's standard group and got an overall 7.0 in his first attempt. 🎧 LISTENING - 8.5 📖 READING - 7.0 ✍️ WRITING - 6.0 🗣️ SPEAKING - 6.0 Teacher: Furqat Olimjonov (@ielts_cream) Ingliz tilini o'rganing va siz ham IELTS dan o'quvchilarimizdek yuqori ball oling. Qishki barcha guruhlar uchun qabul ochiq ⤵️ 📩 @diyorbeksielts_admin 📩 @diyorbeksielts_yunusobod

👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC640 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

So’nggi intensiv guruhimiz ajoyib natijalar bilan yakunlandi! 🎉 📊 Natijalar quyidagicha: • Overall 7.5: 5 nafar o‘quvchi • Overall 7.0: 1 nafar o‘quvchi 📝 Writing natijalar: • Writing 7.0: 2 nafar • Writing 6.5: 4 nafar 📖🔈 Reading va Listening: Ko‘pchilik o'quvchilarimiz bu bo‘limlardan 7.5-8.5 oralig‘ida yuqori natijalar ko‘rsatishdi. 8.0 va undan yuqori ball olishni maqsad qilgan o‘quvchilarimiz esa biroz k…

👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC≈1,150 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Egamberdi studied in the same IELTS standard group as Oybek who also got 7.0. Two other students, Madina and Muhammadyusuf, in the same group also took the test but got 6.5. But they were a bit unlucky. The speaking score was also unfair. You can check the results for yourself. Other outstanding students are yet to take the test. When they do, they will achieve great results. Just wait. PS: I finished only one IELT…

❤‍🔥1👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC603 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Sabrina completed our INTENSIVE PROGRAM and also got an overall 7.5 with no section less than 7 OVERALL: 7.5 🎧 LISTENING - 8.5 🚀 📖 READING - 7.0 📝 WRITING - 7.0 🗣 SPEAKING - 7.0 Qishki barcha guruhlar uchun qabul ochiq ⤵️ 📩 @diyorbeksielts_admin

👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC812 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Temur also completed our INTENSIVE PROGRAM and was able to achieve an overall 7.5 with an 8.5 in Reading OVERALL: 7.5 🎧 LISTENING - 8.5 📖 READING - 8.5 🚀 📝 WRITING - 6.5 🗣 SPEAKING - 6.0 Qishki barcha guruhlar uchun qabul ochiq ⤵️ 📩 @diyorbeksielts_admin

👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC485 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Dildora completed our INTENSIVE PROGRAM and was able to achieve an overall 7.5 with an 8.5 in Reading OVERALL: 7.5 🎧 LISTENING - 7.5 📖 READING - 8.5 🚀 📝 WRITING - 6.5 🗣 SPEAKING - 6.5 Qishki barcha guruhlar uchun qabul ochiq ⤵️ 📩 @diyorbeksielts_admin

👍1👏1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC480 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

👍1

Signed Furkatjon

5 Jan 2025, 16:24 UTC543 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

👍1

Signed Furkatjon

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @thefurqatielts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

📚 ZiyoPrint 📚
@ZiyoPrint · 241 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Sjjzka
@diyorbeksielts · 2995 posts Invite to channel
@ielts_cream · 2074 posts Siroj notes | 8.5
@Siroj_Notes · 44,0741 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Siroj notes | 8.5
@Siroj_Notes · 44,074
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026

My IELTS materials!
@IELTSmaterials_N1 · 33,326
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026

ENGLISH PODCAST 🎧 | Английский подкасты 🎧
@listening_english_podcast · 58,735
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IELTS WITH FURQATJON 8.5” (@thefurqatielts), 1,679 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thefurqatielts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.