Channel
@theforexfarmer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002767435880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theforexfarmer |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theforexfarmer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 59 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 57 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 57 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Ladies & Gentleman! ‼️🚨 I will always fight these non-intelligent impersonators, everytime I get messages from one of you guys claiming to be scammed until i see the screenshots.. I can then see it’s these impersonators‼️ These impersonators will slightly change their usernames closer to mine so you can end up going in their groups by accident‼️ For example look at the group saying it offers investments from forexh…
One of the most asked questions… Is getting into our Copy-Trading service better than purchasing our EAs? 🤔🤷♂️ Absolutely! 🚀🚀 BUT MOSTLY if you don’t have time to understand Robot/EA controls, backtest, do optimization and create your own personalized settings 🧑💻 It could be way harder if you don’t have general knowledge on how EAs function including understanding the logic of some inputs, already sounds complica…
Visit 👉 forexhubcopytrader.com Options to join: - PAID SERVICE 🏆 - FREE SERVICE 🏆 Free Service: ✅ Requirements $300 min deposit ✅ Must use our recommended brokers ✅ Only one account allowed per user to maintain storage for other users. ✅ You don’t pay a fee but we keep 50% of any withdrawal you make. ✅ Available MT4 & MT5 Paid Service: ✅ Requirements $100 min deposit ✅ Can use any broker you want to use ✅ Up to 3 …
⚠️ Notice: If you’ve ever made a withdrawal and suddenly notice that no new trades are opening, don’t panic. 😊 This usually means your withdrawal has triggered your broker’s minus balance threshold. Some brokers do this, and it’s completely normal. ❗ The main issue is that our copier interprets this as a Drawdown (DD) Alert. It assumes the account has reached a high drawdown and will automatically pause trading to…
🚨 Becareful guys, this account is pretending to be ForexHub ‼️ Our official forexhub channels are only @forexhubsaofficiall @forexhubsa (Repositioning in progress)
🟢 COPYTRADER TRACKING WEBSITE IS NOW LIVE 🟢 Visit 👉 https://forexhubcopytrader.com/ SEE THE FULL PERFORMANCE OF THE MASTER ACCOUNT ✅ Overtime we plan to add even user connected accounts for a much more clear transparency! We just need to get the permission before having their account stats displayed to our website 🔥 Note: There may be a slight delay with the connectivity pulling station towards the MetaTrader pl…
Live Performance Tracking Website COMING SOON!!🔥🔥🔥 Users will be able to see performance and full stats of the master account, all data is accurate and in real time with no delays! 🙌⚡️
Looks like we had some new daredevil 👀🔥 he took 3 spaces for himself and just went all out requesting for “FXH-HIGH-RISK” 😭 1 account at $150 didn’t make it while peaked at $1K (possibly due to the high spread in BTCUSD weekend trading) and from the 2, one reached already the $5K target and one is getting close $5K target.. 🎯 See also results from other users in different modes and durations! 💪 More results coming …
Swing Trading Now Available🗣🗣 Active subscribers may now request access to our exclusive swing trading account server, that is copying our HQ (High Quality) trades! 🥵🥵🥵 Why add Swing Trading to your portfolio? ✍️ Defeats commissions: Fewer trades, lower charges on overall. ✍️ Higher Returns: Caught at major market turning points for maximum pip potential. ✍️ Supported on more accounts: Brokers hardly have a prob…
COPYTRADER SALE IS LIVE! 🔥🔥 You don’t need to trade alone…You don’t need to chase every signal…You don’t need to stress over every candle 🙌🔥 Sometimes you need a solid system, proper risk management, and a team that focuses on disciplined performance…⚡️ Our Copy-Trading service is built for people who want to grow with structure, not gambling 🥱 Whether you’re starting small or looking for a long-term setup, this i…
Fastest Flip the team has initiated!⚡️$200 to $1,3K in just 20 Hours using high risk mode. 🙌
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @theforexfarmer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 68,683 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FOREX FARMER PRO” (@theforexfarmer), 59 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theforexfarmer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.