📢 Update : July 1. Vantage: Shadow Emperor: +110% Apex 3: +120% TianYun1: +130% (still running) JustMarkets LeDestin: +127% ----- Join : https://t.me/copytradingx10
❤5😱4

Channel
@thedatafivietnam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,608subscribers
-148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001473017694 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thedatafivietnam |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thedatafivietnam |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 4,608 | -22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 4,630 | -20 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 4,650 | -16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 4,666 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 4,675 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 4,685 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 4,696 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 4,707 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 4,717 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 4,730 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 4,742 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 4,750 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 4,757 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 4,756 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 4,756 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
176 reactions across 25 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 122 | 69.3% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 6.82% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 4.55% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.98% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 3.41% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.84% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.27% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.27% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 2.27% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 1.70% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.568% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thedatafivietnam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📢 Update : July 1. Vantage: Shadow Emperor: +110% Apex 3: +120% TianYun1: +130% (still running) JustMarkets LeDestin: +127% ----- Join : https://t.me/copytradingx10
❤5😱4
❤️🔥 Hot nhé bà con. Trong hôm nay hoặc mai sẽ có 1 bot FREE (profit share =0%) chạy trên sàn Vantage. Ai chưa có tài khoản thì đăng ký lẹ nhé. Lưu ý chỉ dành cho người dùng mã giới thiệu của team. Cách đăng ký: xem link ni hỉ https://t.me/copytradingx10/12 P/s: cho ae nào hỏi sao nay sộp thế thì trên hình đó kkk. Sáng nay đậm đà quá 😛 trộm vía.
❤8
Ae nào đang follow kênh copy trading x10 thì vô đếm tiền với đọc thông báo mới lẹ lẹ nhé
❤7
Thông báo đổi tên kênh copy trading: Tên cũ: Copy Trading X100 Tên mới: Copy Trading X10, kênh giới thiệu https://t.me/copytradingx10 Lí do: Sau khi đổi từ Public channel thành Private channel thì username x100 bị mất (vào tay 1 bên khác, ko phải của team).
❤8😢2👍1
JustMarkets X6 sáng nay nhưng là TK cá nhân. Style bên đây team chỉ đánh HRHR x2 đổ lên. Sau đợt họ "nghèo" đi thì chưa đánh lại. Giờ test thấy giàu lại rồi, rút ngon rồi. Tuần này team sẽ test lại social cho copy bên này nên là các bác đk TK dần đi nhé. Link https://one.justmarkets.link/a/twj9uk0tul Mã giới thiệu: twj9uk0tul Xem Hướng dẫn ĐK xong thì nhắn UID cho @wildbees để vô kênh private nhé.
❤8
Dậy đếm $ kìa các bác 😍 🚀 Nova Strike: x10 🚀 Fast Feed: x4 🚀 TianJi: x2.5 🚀 Apex Flow +77% 🚀 Nova Edge +35% 🚀 Suvan1 +40% 🚀 Mask Flow (XM) +48%
🥰5💯3❤2🔥2
GM! Khả năng là hôm nay đánh nhé mọi người. Ngoài ra, vài thông báo quan trọng về hoạt động copy trade của team: 1. Từ nay sẽ chỉ đăng ở kênh Copy Trading (đỡ chạy qua lại giữa 2 nơi). 2. Kênh copy trade sẽ chuyển qua private. 👉 Vậy, để join kênh thì bạn nhắn UID cho Sy nhé. Link kênh: https://t.me/+wMC05gTzu7BlYjZl Mãi iu!!!
❤5👍3👏1
Thông báo quan trọng: 📣 Dời lịch đánh (sẽ báo ngày cụ thể sau) 📣 Bot Free, profit share = 0% gồm: » Vantage: Fast Feed » Bybit: TianJi —> link mời. 💲Fund: Tùy bạn. Tham khảo: Nếu đợt trước dùng $100 để copy mà bị âm $70 thì nay dùng $100 để khi ~x2 là về bờ. Link đăng ký tài khoản và cài đặt copy: - Vantage: English | Vietnamese - Bybit: English | Vietnamese 📣 Bots khác vẫn chạy như cũ Nova Strike, Nova Edge, Ap…
🔥3
Hi các bác. Tối nay signal đến muộn, tk cá nhân đánh đang ăn nên thử bật bot lên cho ae ăn T2 khỏi đánh, mà vừa bật bot cái …bay hơn nửa mùa xuân. Chưa kịp định hồn 😭😭 Thực sự là không thể chơi vào ngày thiếu thanh khoản nữa. Dính cây giật hơn 100pips. Nên team có kế hoạch như sau: ⚖️ Đánh bù một bữa “không chia lãi” ở sàn Vantage vào thứ 2 (15/06). ⚠️ Cụ thể bot nào team sẽ báo sau. 🚀 Cách đánh sẽ tăng risk lên…
❤6💯2🥰1😁1
🛎️ Thông báo: Dời lịch đánh Bybit qua tuần sau nhé cả nhà. Dự là thứ 2 (ngày 15). Nay thị trường gần như ko muốn mình quậy nên thôi nà. Cảm ơn cả nhà đã dài cổ đợi cùng Sy kkk. P/s: ae nếu có rút ra futu thì cũng nhẹ nhẹ, trừ vốn tuần sau quẩy nhá 🤣 Cuối tuần zui zẻ !!!
❤7😢1
Ai bấm vào link mà bị mờ nút “Sao chép” thì gửi UID cho @wildbees nhé
👌1
Ngày mai 12/06 đánh Bybit tiếp nhé các bác. Link copy trade: https://i.bybit.com/1jab6Xqt?action=inviteToCopy Giờ chạy sẽ bất chợt, cứ copy sẵn hỉ. Nhắc xíu nè: - Ko allin - Làm đúng hướng dẫn này - Bấm đk ko được thì gửi UID cho @wildbees
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @thedatafivietnam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@thedatafivietnam edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The DataFi - Channel” (@thedatafivietnam), 4,608 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedatafivietnam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.