Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for THE CULTT

Channel

THE CULTT

@thecultt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,647subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001169719500
TypeChannel
Username@thecultt
DescriptionСмотрите новинки ресейл-платформы THE CULTT раньше всех! Бутик: Москва, ул. Петровский бульвар 1с1 Чат-бот для продажи @thecultt_bot Поддержка @thecultt_help Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a4667724c8ba6dca90af3c
Created14 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thecultt

Growth

32,64332,66532,6546 August 2026 — 32,665 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,665 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,664 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,662 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,664 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,662 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,651 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,643 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,649 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,653 subscribers15 August 2026 — 32,647 subscribers32,6476 August 202615 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,640–32,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:4732,647-6
14 Aug 2026, 06:3632,653+4
12 Aug 2026, 20:0832,649+6
11 Aug 2026, 19:1332,643-8
10 Aug 2026, 16:5532,651-11
9 Aug 2026, 14:1532,662-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:1632,664+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:2832,662-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:2032,664-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:0132,665no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5532,665first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.97%
avg views ÷ 32,647 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.226%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held56 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total72,539
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
67,400
Videos
269
Links
33,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 51 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12785.8%
🔥1711.5%
💔42.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Chanel Drill Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 102 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

1💔1

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Gucci Jackie Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 170 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

1💔1

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC958 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Valentino Vlogo Комплект: пыльник Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 80 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

3

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC947 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Dolce&Gabbana Sicily Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 70 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

🔥2

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC914 views1 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Hermes Herbag 31 Комплект: пыльник, клошет-замок Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 230 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC912 views5 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Fendi Baguette Комплект: пыльник, коробка Состояние: новое Стоимость THE CULTT: 200 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

5

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC917 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Celine Lulu Комплект: пыльник, коробка Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 210 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

1💔1

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC911 views9 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Prada Leather Bag Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 85 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

🔥9

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,050 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Dior Revolution Комплект: пыльник Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 150 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

3

15 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,050 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🏷 Loewe Hammock Состояние: отличное Стоимость THE CULTT: 110 000 ₽ Купить на сайте Примерить в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1 Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

2

14 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,330 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сегодня на сайте и в приложении появилась еще 101 новинка. Каждая из них — в единственном экземпляре. Вы можете примерить лоты в бутике на Петровском бульваре, 1с1. При выборе онлайн, пожалуйста, добавьте фильтр «Лоты в бутике», чтобы проверить наличие.

2

14 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,270 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

1. Chanel Cerf - 370 000 ₽ 2. Chanel Timeless Classic - 340 000 ₽ 3. Cartier Juste Un Clou - 374 000 ₽ 4. Cartier Clash - 353 000 ₽ 5. Chanel Bowling - 650 000 ₽ 6. Cartier Just un Clou - 890 000 ₽ 7. Cartier Love - 145 000 ₽ 8. Celine Triomphe - 200 000 ₽ 9. Balenciaga Monaco - 350 000 ₽ Все новинки можно найти в приложении Задать вопрос @thecultt_help

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @thecultt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 230,540 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“THE CULTT” (@thecultt), 32,647 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecultt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.