74 yes 10 over

Channel
The Cricket Lord
@thecriclord
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,727subscribers
-542 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002151068115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thecriclord |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thecriclord |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 1,727 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,737 | -528 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 2,265 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 2,269 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 2,269 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
44 pass 😊✅
40 yes 6 over
ENGW vs NZW • 28th Match, Group B • ICC Women's T20 World Cup
Loss cut book set 🙈✅✅
Pakistan woman khao 30 paisa Fast Entry
42 yes 6over
PAKW vs NEDW • 26th Match, Group A • ICC Women's T20 World
Loss cut 15paisa jackpot mubarak
SFU vs SOR • 11th Match • Major League Cricket Seattle orcas 15 paisa khao
70 yes 10 over
45 Pass session ✅👍
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thecriclord. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 472,601 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@stechzyt · 86,426
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Cricket Lord” (@thecriclord), 1,727 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thecriclord.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.