Channel
@theanotheronebook
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,157subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002112531325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theanotheronebook |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 3 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theanotheronebook |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 1,157 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 1,160 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 1,165 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 1,164 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 1,168 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 1,166 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 1,169 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,170 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 1,174 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,176 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,176 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 3 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
214 reactions across 3 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 97 | 45.3% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 11.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 7.01% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.87% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.40% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.935% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.467% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2024 to 4 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Моби Дик" Автор: Герман Мелвилл Вы замечали, как важен контекст в котором мы читаем книги? Моби Дика я читал в период, когда читать хотелось не сильно, но я поставил себе цель. Из-за чего мое восприятие было немного искажено. Долгое время описываемое казалось мне нудным и ненужным. Чтение порой утомляло.. Все эти описания процессов, антуража и т.п. иногда нервировали.. Но, когда я приблизился к развязке, ощутил ч…
❤18🔥7👍5👏4
"Робинзон Крузо" Автор: Даниэль Дефо. Именно с обзора на этот, и без меня известный, роман я решил к вам вернуться. Почему именно Робинзон Крузо? Вероятно из-за того, что именно эта история наиболее мне близка в последнее время. Конечно, на необитаемом острове мне к сожалению (или к счастью) побывать не удалось, но пожить такой вот "земной" жизнью вполне себе посчастливилось. Робинзон. Крузо - по-настоящему чудес…
👍35❤29🔥11👀1👎1
"Великий Гэтсби" Автор: Фрэнсис Скотт Фицджеральд. Роман, который по иронии судьбы я читал дважды. Не из-за того, что он так чудесен, а просто сперва видел фильм, потом читал один раз, о чем забыл напрочь.. Лишь под конец второго прочтения я наткнулся на деталь, которая смогла освежить память.. Тот случай, когда фильм мне понравился больше. Просто потому, что снят он фантастически. Сама история весьма увлекательн…
👍57❤20❤🔥15🔥7👎2😢2
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @theanotheronebook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“В книге все было иначе” (@theanotheronebook), 1,157 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theanotheronebook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.