Video, posted without a caption

Channel
The Odds Portal
@theactionsnetwork
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,996subscribers
-253 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001921130329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @theactionsnetwork |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/theactionsnetwork |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@theactionsnetwork was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 10,996 | -12 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 11,008 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 11,008 | -187 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:45 | 11,195 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 11,205 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 11,211 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 11,227 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 11,230 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 11,241 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 11,249 | first reading |
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.399%
- avg views ÷ 10,996 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 43.9
- 95 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 95
- of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (26 August 2026 – 16 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,167 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 16 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 10s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
This is what we won on Saturday on Stake! Anyone can fake a screenshot, but no one can fake this 🎥✅ If the bet was edited, the edits would go away ⚠️ Proof for those who need proof 👀
Photo, posted without a caption
This client bet on Saturday's games and won $188,000 ✅ He placed his bet on the Bet365 app. The app cannot be edited. Results come directly from the server and cannot be changed by anyone. What you see is exactly what happened. Nobody can question that 🔍 If you have been asking for proof, there it is. Verify it yourself 💯 Tonight's bet is ready and spots for new clients are limited 🔥 Message us now and let's get …
Photo, posted without a caption
These are the stats from our betting account showing last Saturday’s win — recorded under Sunday because the matches finished after midnight ✅ Here is why this cannot be faked: Betting account history is pulled directly from the platform's servers. It cannot be edited or touched by anyone. Every win, every date, every result is recorded automatically. Scammers fake screenshots. They cannot fake a full account histor…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥 This is the bet we have placed for tomorrow’s games on Stake 🎯 🔒 We only bet on fixed matches and we only use secure information, so winning is guaranteed. High odds + maximum security = serious profit ✅ ⚠️ Spots are limited and reservations close tomorrow at 9 PM UK time. After we reach the limit, we stop accepting new clients. 🛡️ All new clients get our exclusive Money Back in Services Guarantee—so if anythin…
Video, posted without a caption
Here is a screen recording showing the client’s payment to our wallet on the blockchain for full transparency. Blockchain transactions cannot be edited, deleted, or manipulated—if a payment is recorded on the blockchain, it is 100% real. We share this to prove that our payments and transactions are genuine.
Photo, posted without a caption
This is the moment a new client sent his payment and joined us ✅ He saw Saturday's bet. He saw the results. He saw they were real. And he decided to stop watching and start winning 💯 His payment was made in Bitcoin. Every Bitcoin transaction is recorded on the blockchain and can be verified by anyone. Public. Transparent. No hiding anything 🔍 This is what happens when you show your work consistently. People see it…
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @theactionsnetwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@upper_bet · 48,209
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
@Fixed_Ticket_Odds · 47,125
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 16 September 2026
@dreammathsyoutube · 49,111
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Odds Portal” (@theactionsnetwork), 10,996 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theactionsnetwork.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.