Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Goys

Channel

The Goys

@the_goys

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,806subscribers

-89 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002357479540
TypeChannel
Username@the_goys
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/the_goys

Growth

3,8063,8953,850.58 August 2026 — 3,895 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,895 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,879 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,860 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,806 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -89. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,793–3,908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:363,806-54
14 Aug 2026, 07:363,860-19
11 Aug 2026, 08:023,879-16
8 Aug 2026, 14:083,895no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:013,895first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.42%
avg views ÷ 3,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
321
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (3 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total4,167
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

264 reactions across 19 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆7829.5%
custom 54246765639562926223412.9%
custom 5280514736830555244186.82%
custom 5359360393535828595186.82%
custom 5470114053772818705176.44%
😁176.44%
custom 5359484191673167746145.30%
custom 5958319855277971621145.30%
custom 5938325816147448855103.79%
🔥93.41%
custom 537310176344225519183.03%
custom 539573089815286667872.65%
💋72.65%
😢62.27%
custom 532821941532862020451.89%
👍20.758%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @the_goys. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC109 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 52805147368305552442custom 53282194153286202042

5 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC114 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Возьмите 🎁 , распишитесь Stickers & Emoji

custom 53282194153286202043custom 52805147368305552441custom 59583198552779716211

5 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC149 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Будущие скины на 🎁 Дизайнер подарков подвёл итоги конкурса концептов. Участники прислали более 200 работ, свыше 30 из которых были отобраны в качестве идей для будущих скинов. Некоторые уже взяты в работу.

🔥4custom 52805147368305552443custom 59383258161474488552😁1

30 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC325 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Павел Дуров внесен в перечень террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга F

custom 595831985527797162113😢6

30 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC294 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Redo скоро выйдет погулять

custom 59383258161474488556🔥1custom 52805147368305552441

29 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC347 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Краткая реакция от Telegram на последние новости:

😁7custom 52805147368305552446

26 Jul 2026, 18:35 UTC391 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🏆11🔥2custom 52805147368305552441

20 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC543 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша Победители: 1. 𝔰𝔥𝔬𝔣𝔱𝔦///𝔚ℌ𝔒ℜ𝔈 𝔐𝔒𝔇𝔈°*𝔪𝔢𝔢 (@SHOFTII) 2. SᕼᗩᗪOᗯ | CNeon (@C_neon) 3. Nyi (@nyikhantt) 4. .ZUT (@BEZstraHakm) 5. Sawzer (@SawzerMyEgo) 6. omegle ed cam show (@fckmemey) 7. w0qpl (@w0qpl) 8. Dirigabl (@dirigabl) 9. капец. (@kapeck22) 10. Mariia (@rms_95) Проверить результаты

🏆9🔥1custom 52805147368305552441

20 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC455 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Через минут 40 завершим, а то вдруг завтра уберут мишек ☀️

🏆8

19 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC464 views41 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Чё, кто выиграет, как думаете? 🇪🇸🇦🇷

custom 542467656395629262229custom 547011405377281870512

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @the_goys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 318,925 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Goys” (@the_goys), 3,806 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/the_goys.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.