Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

حملة لا

@theNOcampaign

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,019subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111791498
TypeChannel
Username@theNOcampaign
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/theNOcampaign

Growth

3,0193,0343,026.56 August 2026 — 3,034 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,034 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,031 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,026 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,019 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,017–3,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:183,019-7
10 Aug 2026, 09:213,026-5
7 Aug 2026, 06:303,031-3
6 Aug 2026, 18:003,034no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:493,034first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 19s
Average length
1m 50s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3888.4%
12.33%
❤‍🔥12.33%
💔12.33%
💘12.33%
😁12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC731 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @abnaalsayedPhoto

عناوين حملة #أبناء_السيد ١ : • لأجل الثبات على العهد مع الولي • لأجل تحقيق قيم القائد الشهيد وأهدافه • لأجل بث اليأس في العدو • لأجل الصمود في وجه المستكبرين • لأجل الوفاء لدماء الشهداء • لأجل الإنتقام لدماء أطفالنا • لأجل أمة إسلامية أكثر قوة • لأجل استقلال الشعوب المسلمة https://www.instagram.com/p/DaQ5ZlnAC6E/?igsh=djdyeG53eDUzYmFu https://t.me/abnaalsayed

51❤‍🔥1

1 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC581 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @abnaalsayedPhoto

#أبناء_السيد https://www.instagram.com/abnaa.alsayed https://t.me/abnaalsayed

2

1 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC550 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @abnaalsayedPhoto

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم تحت ظلال الفقد العظيم، نطلّ اليوم كـ «أبناء السيد» ؛ ثــلّةٌ من الشباب اللبنانيين الذين يحملون في قلوبهم عشق الولاية ويمتشقون سلاح الرواية وجهاد التبيين، متوجّهين للمشاركة في مراســم تشييع تجلّي الحــق في زماننا، العبد الصالح والفقيه العارف والقائد المعظم الإمام السيد علي الخامنئي (قدّس سره) لأن الدمع وحده لا يفي المقام حقّه، نطلق هذه المبادرة كحملة فنيّة وثقافيّة للمشاركة الرمزية وتخـليد مشه

4

27 Jun 2026, 15:04 UTC815 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @in_front_of_the_martyrVideo

تشييع الولي #قوموا_لله #باید_برخاست @in_front_of_the_martyr

4💔1😁1

24 Jun 2026, 11:48 UTC924 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

​مِن زوايا العزّ المنسكب في تراب الأرض، جمعنا شظايا الصمود الناطقة.. عَمَّدناها بصور الخلود والتضحيات، سُقناها قرابينَ حبٍّ إلى محراب الوِصال.. وبنيناها جُذورَ رايةٍ صدحَت بتَسبيحِ العاشر. ​كلُّ ما تقدمّ من تضحيات، وكلُّ جرحٍ حفرته نيرانُ يَزيدِ العَصرِ في قلوبنا، هو فداءُ لبقاءِ ذكر الحسين في المَلا.. ولتظلَّ الذاكرةُ نابضةً تردد تلك الصرخة.. “يا ربَّ الحُسين بحقِّ الحُسَين إشفِ صدر الحُسَين بِظُهورِ الحُجَّة “..

3

21 Jun 2026, 00:02 UTC926 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

الحملة الشعبية العالمية "لا" مشاركة: زينب شكر، لبنان #لا #لا_اله_الا_الله

9💘1

20 Jun 2026, 23:59 UTC754 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⁨ ايمتى منحمل العلم اللبناني ؟؟ #لبنان #النبطية⁩ الحملة الشعبية العالمية "لا" مشاركة: علي نقر، لبنان #لا #لا_اله_الا_الله

2

20 Jun 2026, 23:59 UTC470 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

گریزد از صف ما #هرکه مرد غوغا نیست کسی که کشته نشد از قبیله ما نیست... کتیبه پشت سن مثلی #لا یبایع مثله به سفارش هیات رزم..ندگان اس...لام زنجان پ ن۱: استفاده تجاری_خرید و فروش و ... شرعا مجاز نبوده و حق الناس می باشد. پ ن ۲: هیات ها و مجموعه های فرهنگی مجاز به چاپ و استفاده #غیر_تجاری می باشند. تغییر در اجزای کتیبه ممنوع😏 دانلود از کانال ایتا یا تلگرام ایدی در بیو پیج ۱۴۰۵ کارگاه طراحی فانوس @fanos_graph #کتیب

3

20 Jun 2026, 23:56 UTC463 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⁨ ⁨ عاشوراء يعني النبطية #عاشوراء #النبطية #محرم #لبنان⁩⁩ الحملة الشعبية العالمية "لا" مشاركة: علي نقر، لبنان #لا #لا_اله_الا_الله

3

20 Jun 2026, 23:55 UTC331 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

لدينا هدفًا ومشروعًا قويًا اسمه "حقّنا بالدفاع وتحرير الأرض" الجمعة 19-06-2026‏ 04 محرّم 1448 هـ #عمليات_عاشوراء #معركة_العصف_المأكول الحملة الشعبية العالمية "لا" مشاركة: التعبئة التربوية شعبة كفرتبنيت، لبنان #لا #لا_اله_الا_الله

1

20 Jun 2026, 23:52 UTC325 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

" إنّي والله، لو لقيتهم فرداً وهم مِلءُ الأرض ما باليتُ ولا استوحشْت.." الحملة الشعبية العالمية "لا" مشاركة: مجموعة عصا موسى، لبنان #لا #لا_اله_الا_الله

2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @theNOcampaign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 653,497 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حملة لا” (@theNOcampaign), 3,019 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/theNOcampaign.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.