Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,915–3,942 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:22
3,922
+4
13 Sept 2026, 19:15
3,918
-5
10 Sept 2026, 07:39
3,923
-1
5 Sept 2026, 02:20
3,924
+5
1 Sept 2026, 19:25
3,919
-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:25
3,920
-6
27 Aug 2026, 02:43
3,926
-5
24 Aug 2026, 07:47
3,931
+4
20 Aug 2026, 08:22
3,927
-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:55
3,931
-4
11 Aug 2026, 06:44
3,935
-3
8 Aug 2026, 12:38
3,938
-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
3,939
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:38
3,939
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
131 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
39
29.8%
🔥
37
28.2%
❤
25
19.1%
😁
16
12.2%
😱
4
3.05%
💯
2
1.53%
😍
2
1.53%
🤣
2
1.53%
🥰
2
1.53%
🌚
1
0.763%
🤔
1
0.763%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tgshop_io. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
WB изменил оферту — теперь ваш логотип принадлежит им ‼️
В новостях стали появляться заявления от селлеров о том, что их пострадавшие товары нашли на китайском маркетплейсе. Скопировано всё: карточка, отзывы, название бренда, но продавцы везде указаны другие.
Оказалось, что в этой ситуации есть две особенности:
1️⃣При покупке заказ падает продавцу с WB. Но селлеры недовольны, что их не предупредили, что будут испо…
Селлеры уходят в Казахстан. Что ждёт e-com в ближайшее время?
СМИ пишут о том, что некоторым селлерам с маркетплейсов придётся перевезти товары на склады Казахстана, чтобы защитить их. Бренды ждёт дополнительная финансовая нагрузка, долгая логистика до покупателей и неопределённое будущее. Но есть и две хорошие новости:
1️⃣Покупатели из онлайна никуда не уйдут. Во-первых, потому что стоимость на товары онлайн ниже.…
⚡️ Дурова* внесли в перечень террористов и экстремистов. Что теперь будет с бизнесом в Telegram?
Хорошая новость: мессенджер НЕ признали экстремистским. Более того, Госдума уверяет, что автоматически это не произойдет и сейчас пользоваться TG никто не запрещает:
• Можно оформлять подписку (это не считается спонсированием);
• Вести каналы и продавать рекламу не запрещено;
• Общаться через чаты и звонки в TG можно.
…
Общайтесь с покупателями через агрегатор чатов в TG.
Партнёры, мы создали бот — через него вы сможете общаться с покупателями, которые пишут в поддержку вашего магазина напрямую в TG, не переходя в Личный Кабинет TGShop.
Бот: @tgshopadmin_bot
А подробнее о нём, его возможностях и том, зачем он вам нужен, в карточках. Желаем высоких продаж! 🔥
➡️ Создать магазин в Telegram или Max за 15 минут
t.me/ не работает — как заменить ссылку 🔗
Telegram больше не открывается в браузере и не переходит по ссылке t.me из Instagram*/TikTok и других внешних площадок.
Что это значит: если у вас в сторис или шапке профиля стоит t.me/вашбот или ссылка на канал — подписчик не сможет по ней перейти. А это потерянные заявки и продажи 📉
Но есть простое решение — 3 шага:
1️⃣ Перепишите ссылку
Вместо t.me/tgshop_io используйт…
WB начал отменять заказы из-за сложностей с доставкой — на это пожаловались в соцсетях. Люди подозревают, что проблема в топливном кризисе, но сама площадка это отрицает.
Вот бы такой сервис, чтобы можно было несколько разных способов доставки на всякий случай подключить. Ах, да. Мы уже существуем 🌚
Апдейт: пресс-служба WB отрицает, что проблемы из-за топлива. По их словам, дело в технической ошибке:
Указанное уве…
Будущее продаж за UGC-контентом 🤝
Каждый второй ролик в ленте рилс или ТикТок — с обзорами на какие-то товары. Вне зависимости от того, платили вы за рекламу или нет, результат будет один — рост охвата, привлечение внимания и ажиотаж вокруг товара. Именно поэтому мы уже имеем:
• Чудодейственную розовую пасту для уборки;
• Самые популярные блески для губ от VOIS;
• Часовые очереди за печеньем в поп-арте в Москве.
В…
ИИ в маркетинге: помощник или переоценённый тренд?
В 2026 году тяжело представить работу без ИИ. Где-то текст подправить, где-то на сообщения ответить или фотографию сгенерировать. Но стоит ли так надеяться на нейросети?
🟢Что ИИ действительно делает хорошо:
• Генерирует идеи и тексты;
• Ускоряет создание контента;
• Анализирует большие объёмы данных;
• Автоматизирует рутинные задачи (рассылки, ответы, сегментацию)…
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tgshop_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Wallpaper Land 🌇 4K & FHD Images @Wallpaper_Land_4K_FHD_Images · 36,369 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TGShop – продажи в Телеграме” (@tgshop_io), 3,922 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgshop_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.