🎉 TgDB is back online! 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
❤10❤🔥2💯2🤓2

Channel
@tgdatabase
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,945subscribers
-948 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001591235789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tgdatabase |
| Description | TgDB official channel TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tgdatabase |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 23,945 | -132 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 24,077 | -21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 24,098 | -41 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 24,139 | -41 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 24,180 | -32 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 24,212 | -55 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:42 | 24,267 | -56 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 24,323 | -38 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 21:12 | 24,361 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 24,380 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 24,394 | -22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 24,416 | +13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 24,403 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 24,410 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 24,421 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 24,433 | -22 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:39 | 24,455 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 24,477 | -44 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 24,521 | -33 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 24,554 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 23 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (23 October 2025 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,050 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
495 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 337 | 68.1% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 6.06% | |
| 🤔 | 28 | 5.66% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 3.84% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 3.64% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 2.22% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 2.22% | |
| 🤓 | 11 | 2.22% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.21% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.808% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.808% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.808% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.808% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.606% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.606% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.404% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 495 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tgdatabase. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 October 2025 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎉 TgDB is back online! 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
❤10❤🔥2💯2🤓2
🎉 TgDB is back online! 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
❤13🏆2💯1
TgDB Search webchat is down for maintenance
❤4👍4🤔4😁4
All known bugs related to the TgDB Search Plus webchat have finally been fixed. The webchat now supports notifications and read receipts for messages sent to the bot. Infinite scrolling and search functionality within the chat history will also be implemented shortly. 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
❤42👍7🥰6❤🔥5
The webchat is currently experiencing some technical issues; we are working to resolve them. The issues will be resolved shortly.
❤8👏2
We've eased the restrictions on the /search command, so regular searches are back to normal! Unfortunately, we’ve had to limit the 'search by ID' feature for certain users for now. Thanks for your patience! 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
❤12👍2
Technical context It is important to understand that @tgdb_search_bot is a public service. For a long time, various third-party Telegram client developers have exploited our bot's functionality to resolve Telegram internal ids into usernames or to provide lookup features within their apps—all without our knowledge, consent, or approval. The presence of our username in a codebase does not imply any partnership or mal…
❤10🔥5🤔2
Public Statement regarding the Nekogram incident We are aware of the recent controversy surrounding the Nekogram application and the claims regarding the unauthorized transmission of user phone numbers. Following the public disclosure (GitHub Issue #336), many users have noticed the username @tgdb_search_bot mentioned within Nekogram's source code. We want to address this directly to clear up any misinformation and …
❤21🤔5🔥1
ℹ️ TgDB Update 🇬🇧 The issue causing slow response times for Chinese language queries on the TelegramDB Search Bot has been resolved. System indexing has been optimized, and Chinese search results now load instantly. 🇨🇳 TelegramDB Search Bot 中文搜索响应缓慢的问题现已修复。系统已完成优化,中文搜索结果现可实现即时加载。 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
❤15
🎉 TgDB is back online! 📱 TgDB Search Lite: @tgdb_search_bot 🖥 TgDB Search Plus: tgdb.org/bot
🙏9❤5🤯3🆒1
TgDB Search will be down for maintenance for about ~8h
❤9
⚡️ TgDB: 50% OFF IS NOW LIVE! The wait is over! To push toward our 1 Million Users milestone, we are cutting all prices in half for the next 7 days. Starting today, all commands are 50% OFF exclusively via our Web App. The Web interface is the only place to purchase credits and access our full suite of premium features. If you’ve only been using the bot on Telegram, now is the best time to try the new version: …
❤20🤔6🔥3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @tgdatabase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TgDB News (TelegramDB)” (@tgdatabase), 23,945 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tgdatabase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.