Если у вас есть чат где 200-400 онлайна можешь сделать вазимо пиар через оп в лс @xron_win

Channel
NFT | CHANNEL
@tg_nft121
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
124subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002716867086 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tg_nft121 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 26 June 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tg_nft121 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 124 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 123 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 125 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 124 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 120 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 120 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
🦈 Хочешь освободить больше времени и при этом расти в прибыли? Когда всё делаешь вручную — рано или поздно упираешься в потолок. Это нормально. Просто дальше нужно масштабироваться через инструменты. Этим мы и занимаемся в DEVshark. Мы пишем рабочий софт под любые задачи: сайты, боты, автоматизации — всё, что снимает рутину и делает процесс быстрее. Что можем сделать для тебя: 🛒 Автошопы под ключ 🎰 Казино и мини-и…
Закреплю ваш пост за любой нфт подарок писать @xron_win
🦈 Хочешь освободить больше времени и при этом расти в прибыли? Когда всё делаешь вручную — рано или поздно упираешься в потолок. Это нормально. Просто дальше нужно масштабироваться через инструменты. Этим мы и занимаемся в DEVshark. Мы пишем рабочий софт под любые задачи: сайты, боты, автоматизации — всё, что снимает рутину и делает процесс быстрее. Что можем сделать для тебя: 🛒 Автошопы под ключ 🎰 Казино и мини-и…
Короче эксперимент будет поставлю на ночь за сообщения 1 звезду если вам зайдет то оставлю если нет то уберу
Куплю подарок за 400 звезд примерно 1.1к
Куплю подарки за звезды
@xron_win провели сделку грамотно, быстро и четко, всем советую🤍
Отзыв номер 2
Фаст селл
•Продаю звезды по курсу 1.5₽ •Скупаю нфт •Писать @xron_win
Скупаю нфт писать в лс @xron_win
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tg_nft121. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@tg_nft121 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFT | CHANNEL” (@tg_nft121), 124 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg_nft121.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.