НЕ ПРОПУСТИТЕ 2 ТАЙМ ЭТОГО ШОУ ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 📺ССЫЛКА НА ТРАНСЛЯЦИЮ
Channel
11x11 Old
@tg_11x11
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
961subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001453550829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tg_11x11 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tg_11x11 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:29 | 961 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 962 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 962 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
88 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 52.3% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 34.1% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 6.82% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 6.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2022 to 2 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ХОЛААААААНД ДУБЛЬ 🔥🔥🔥 ТРИ НОЛЬ ‼️‼️‼️ 📺Ссылка на трансляцию
🔥Манчестер Юнайтед - Манчестер Сити 📺 Прямая трансляция матча 👇 https://t.me/+8gWkK8Fa6VMzNmJi https://t.me/+8gWkK8Fa6VMzNmJi
👎1
⚡️Трансляция: Арсенал 🆚 Тоттенхэм 🇧🇷Жезус ⚔️ Кейн🏴 🇪🇸Артета ⚔️ Конте🇮🇹 📺Прямая трансляция без платных источников и обмана
⚡️⚡️⚡️«РЕАЛ МАДРИД» – ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ ЛИГИ ЧЕМПИОНОВ 2021/22 🏆🏆🏆 В ЧЕТЫРНАДЦАТЫЙ РАЗ 1️⃣4️⃣ 🏴Ливерпуль 0:1 Реал Мадрид🇪🇸 ⚽️Голы: 0:1 - 59’ Винисиус (Вальверде) ❌Незасчитанные голы: 0:[1] - 45’ Бензема (офсайд)
🔥13👎5❤1
🏆ГООООООООООЛ🏆 59’ ВИНИСИУС ЗАМКНУЛ В ПУСТЫЕ сильнейший прострел Вальверде 💥💥💥 «РЕАЛ» ПОВЁЛ В ФИНАЛЕ ЛЧ🔥🔥🔥 🏴Ливерпуль 0:1 Реал Мадрид🇪🇸 📺ВИДЕО ГОЛА
❤3
⚡️«РЕАЛ МАДРИД» ВЫШЕЛ В ФИНАЛ ЛИГИ ЧЕМПИОНОВ НА «ЛИВЕРПУЛЬ» 🏴⚔️🇪🇸 🇪🇸Реал Мадрид 3:1 Ман Сити🏴 (общ. 6:5) ⚽️Голы: 0:1 - 73’ Марез (Бернарду), 1:1 - 90’ Родриго (Бензема), 2:1 - 90+1’ Родриго (Асенсио), 3:1 - 95’ Бензема (П)
🔥8❤2
🔵ГООООООООООЛ🔵 90+2’ РОДРИГООООООООООО ДУБЛЬ ЗА 2 МИНУТЫЫЫЫЫЫ 🔥🔥🔥 Головой пробивает точно в верхний угол с навеса Асенсио 🤯 🇪🇸Реал Мадрид 2:1 Ман Сити🏴 (общ. 5:5) 📺ВИДЕО ГОЛА📺
❤4
🔵ГООООООООООЛ🔵 73’ Марез просто расстрелял ближний угол Куртуа из пределов штрафной сильнейшим ударом в верхний угол 💥💥💥 🇪🇸Реал Мадрид 0:1 Ман Сити🏴 (общ. 3:5) 📺ВИДЕО ГОЛА📺
«ЛИВЕРПУЛЬ» В ФИНАЛЕ ЛИГИ ЧЕМПИОНОВ 2021/22! 🔥🔥🔥 Как-то всё Херонимо получилось во втором тайме у «Вильярреала» 🧤🥶 🇪🇸Вильярреал 2:3 Ливерпуль🏴 (общ. 2:5) ⚽️Голы: 1:0 - 3’ Диа (Капу), 2:0 - 41’ Коклен (Капу), 2:1 - 62’ Фабиньо (Салах), 2:2 - 67’ Диас (Трент), 2:3 - 74’ Мане (Кейта) 🟥Удаления: 86’ Капу (Вильярреал)
😢5🔥2
🔵ГООООООООООЛ🔵 62’ Фабиньо зарядил на силу и просто прошил голкипера между ног 💥💥💥 🇪🇸Вильярреал 2:1 Ливерпуль🏴 (общ. 2:3) 📺ВИДЕО ГОЛА📺
🔵ГООООООООООЛ🔵 41’ Коколен выпрыгнул в небеса и шедеврально положил головой в девятку 🔥🔥🔥 🇪🇸Вильярреал 2:0 Ливерпуль🏴 (общ. 2:2) 📺ВИДЕО ГОЛА📺
🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tg_11x11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“11x11 Old” (@tg_11x11), 961 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tg_11x11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.