Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Torrefacto

Channel

Torrefacto

@tfnovosti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,522subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001129742271
TypeChannel
Username@tfnovosti
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tfnovosti

Growth

7,4847,5227,5037 August 2026 — 7,491 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,491 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,490 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,484 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,522 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,478–7,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:067,522+38
11 Aug 2026, 07:287,484-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:007,490-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:307,491no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:187,491first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 7,522 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (19 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total35,986
Reactions total894
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 14s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

894 reactions across 26 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28932.3%
🔥24427.3%
👍14015.7%
custom 544946859695250785910511.7%
🤝242.68%
🤩242.68%
😁161.79%
🏆111.23%
😍101.12%
custom 540675919305299517370.783%
🆒40.447%
🥱40.447%
custom 534830855791997071330.336%
👌30.336%
🕊30.336%
🤣30.336%
🤪30.336%
🍌10.112%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 894reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 26 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tfnovosti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC230 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Индонезия Суматра Керинчи снова на сайте 🇮🇩 Этот кофе — настоящий взрыв тропических нот и ягодной сладости! В нашей обжарке он раскрывается сочным манго и красными ягодами. Тело очень сиропистое и обволакивающее, а аромат пленяет карамельно-пряными нотами. С первого глотка в букете проявляются манго и лесные ягоды, которые плавно переходят в оттенки красного полусухого вина. По мере остывания вкус становится только

3🔥3👍1

11 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC752 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Почему один молотый кофе идеален для эспрессо, а другой — для фильтра? Разбираемся в типах помола и их влиянии на вкус. Для первого знакомства с нашим ассортиментом дарим промокод NEW15 на скидку 15%

👍128🔥7

10 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC944 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Mono Beauty и Torrefacto дарят подарки! ✨☕️ Мы объединили заботу о коже и удовольствие от любимого кофе, чтобы подарить вам идеальный старт дня 💙 Вместе с Torrefacto мы подготовили 3 бокса для утренних ритуалов 🫧☕️ Внутри: ✨ Увлажняющая пенка для умывания ✨ Увлажняющий тоник ✨ Увлажняющая сыворотка ✨ Увлажняющий крем ☕️ Набор кофе в дрип-пакетах «Кофе-компас» от Torrefacto Чтобы принять участие: 1️⃣ Подпишись н

🤝23🔥2013🤪2👍1

9 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈1,060 views26 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Горечь, осадок, слабый аромат — частые ошибки при варке в турке. Разбираем, как их избежать, и варим идеальный кофе!

15👍7🔥4

8 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,230 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Как часто вы покупаете кофе?

  1. 📦 Раз в месяц — большим запасом38%
  2. 🛒 Раз в 2–3 недели — небольшими порциями13%
  3. 🚀 По мере расходования — всегда свежая обжарка53%
  4. 🎁 Чаще получаю в подарок, чем покупаю сам4%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16🔥6👍5🆒1

7 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,210 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

⛳ Мы не просто приехали на гольф-турнир — мы стали его частью! Угощали игроков кофе и чаем, дарили подарки. В дегустации участвовали несколько видов чая и кофе. Гости по-настоящему вдохновились красным чаем с необычным дымным ароматом и долгим ягодным послевкусием «Лесное пламя». Габа Улун из Таоюань тоже удивил: все знают улуны, но технология Габа знакома не каждому, поэтому пробовали с интересом и возвращались.

21👍9🔥6

6 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,330 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Никакой кофеварки — только песок и турка. Готовим самый аутентичный напиток!

21🔥8👍6🤩3

6 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,370 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Венесуэла Карипе снова на сайте 🇻🇪🍯 В этом году мытая Венесуэла в темной обжарке приобрела невероятную медовую сладость! Тело очень обволакивающее и слегка бархатистое. С первого глотка в букете проявляются мед, жареные орешки и очень сочный грейпфрут, который особенно долго сохраняет свой характер на послевкусии. По мере остывания в кофе отчетливо проявляются желтые сушеные фрукты, а особенно курага. В эспрессо В

23👍9🔥5😍2

5 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC≈1,230 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Posted without readable text

17👍9🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈1,270 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Кофе нужно пить горячим» – это, пожалуй, одно из самых популярных заблуждений. Наш эксперт Арина Травина готова с этим поспорить и рассказать, почему лучший глоток вас ждет не сразу. 📌Сразу после заваривания температура напитка слишком высокая – большинству будет некомфортно пить такой кофе. Обычно мы ждем, пока он остынет хотя бы до 60–70 градусов, но даже при такой температуре будет сложно почувствовать все грани

23👍10🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,270 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Долгожданная анаэробная Эфиопия в светлой обжарке— уже на сайте! 🍓🥂 Первая ассоциация при оценке образца зерна от поставщика — клубничный джем. Высокая сладость и богатый ягодный профиль — это только начало. В нашей обжарке мы решили подчеркнуть более энзимный характер: желтые фрукты, свежая клубника, игристое вино и тонкие цветочные оттенки. Советуем знакомиться с лотом на разных температурах. Чашка невероятно хо

🔥188🏆8🥱4🤪1custom 54494685969525078591

2 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈1,320 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какой чай вы предпочитаете в летнюю жару? ☕️

  1. Белый (лёгкий, медовый)27%
  2. Зелёный (свежий, травянистый)56%
  3. Улун (ароматный, цветочный)39%
  4. Шэн пуэр (сухофруктовый, травянистый)13%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14custom 54494685969525078593🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @tfnovosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTCAnonymous Poll325 voters

Как часто вы покупаете кофе?

  1. 📦 Раз в месяц — большим запасом38%
  2. 🛒 Раз в 2–3 недели — небольшими порциями13%
  3. 🚀 По мере расходования — всегда свежая обжарка53%
  4. 🎁 Чаще получаю в подарок, чем покупаю сам4%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTCAnonymous Poll158 voters

Какой чай вы предпочитаете в летнюю жару? ☕️

  1. Белый (лёгкий, медовый)27%
  2. Зелёный (свежий, травянистый)56%
  3. Улун (ароматный, цветочный)39%
  4. Шэн пуэр (сухофруктовый, травянистый)13%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTCAnonymous Poll372 voters

В каком кофейном «преступлении» вы готовы признаться?

  1. Добавляю сахар даже хороший кофе19%
  2. Завариваю на глаз, без весов и таймера44%
  3. Храню кофе дольше, чем стоило бы39%
  4. Пью кофе вечером и спокойно засыпаю44%
  5. Добавляю молоко в любой кофе22%
  6. Не мою кофемашину так часто, как нужно18%
  7. Никаких «преступлений»— я образцовый кофеман8%
  8. Свой вариант (напишите в комментариях)1%

The shares total 195%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTCAnonymous Poll264 voters

Что вам хотелось бы видеть в Torrefacto?

  1. Новые сорта кофе61%
  2. Интересные чайные подборки13%
  3. Помощь с выбором вкуса18%
  4. Рецепты заваривания27%
  5. Наборы для знакомства21%
  6. Аксессуары (кофемашины, турки, воронки и т.д.)40%
  7. Чаще задавать вопросы экспертам8%
  8. Шоурум Torrefacto в вашем городе29%
  9. Свой вариант (напишите в комментариях)3%

The shares total 220%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,127,308 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Torrefacto” (@tfnovosti), 7,522 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tfnovosti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.