Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Женская инстанция

Channel

Женская инстанция

@teytoktalk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,053subscribers

-214 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001996171979
TypeChannel
Username@teytoktalk
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/teytoktalk

Growth

5,0535,2675,1607 August 2026 — 5,267 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,256 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,216 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,173 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,145 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,126 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,098 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,076 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,053 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -214. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,021–5,299 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:085,053-23
27 Aug 2026, 07:365,076-22
24 Aug 2026, 15:565,098-28
20 Aug 2026, 17:055,126-19
17 Aug 2026, 15:265,145-28
14 Aug 2026, 12:175,173-43
11 Aug 2026, 07:515,216-40
8 Aug 2026, 08:115,256-11
7 Aug 2026, 13:175,267first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.43%
avg views ÷ 5,053 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held25 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,064
Reactions total475
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 24s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

475 reactions across 25 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13528.4%
🔥11624.4%
😁11123.4%
👍5712.0%
🥰224.63%
🤣112.32%
🍾51.05%
👀40.842%
30.632%
💯30.632%
🤗30.632%
😱20.421%
🤪20.421%
👏10.211%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ну что же, весчь на фото выше действительно непосредственно связана с индустрией бьюти. И это калибратор красоты! Злодейский мужчина на фото — сам Макс Фактор, который эту штуковину и придумал. С помощью прибора производили замеры пропорций лица и определяли, что же нужно подправить макияжем. Оператор мог настраивать аж 325 регулировок и измерить буквально все лицо от и до! Можно и без калибратора узнать, подходим

4

11 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC85 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Давненько не было рубрики #историческоебьюти. Сегодня в нашей викторине такая загадка: а что, собственно, делает этот злодейский мужчина с своей несчастной жертвой?

5😁4👀2😱2

11 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC93 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Когда с утра ну совсем нет сил на макияж, а на работу надо 🤣 Доброе утро, дорогие мои!

🔥8🤣3😁3👀2🤪2

10 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC106 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Да и честно сказать, охладела душенька моя к обычному человеческому люксу. Гуччи глаз не радует, томы форды с шанелями сердце быстрее биться не заставляют. Зажралися, барыня? Да может быть, может и так. Знаю только, что сейчас мне б хотелось только аурглассового оленя, и какую-нибудь причудинку от красивейшего бренда Chantecaille. Полюбуемся? Обратите, кстати, внимание — показано, как продукт выглядит и на молодой,

🔥115👍2

10 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC110 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

На обратном пути вновь сунулась в дьюти фри. И ну вот совершенно негде потратить деньхи почтенной женщине! Из гламурных брендов порадовал только Jack Daniel's, и то по акции. А так все дорого. Были представлены: 🔘Шарлотта, собственной персоной, Tilburi, а я и не помню вовсе чего у нее надо брать, а чего не надо. 🔘Пощупала стенд Кайли — что-то на скучном молодежном. 🔘Большущий бутик Sol de Janeiro пах одуряюще, но я

🔥11😁5👍2🤣2

10 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC113 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Это я пришла на работу после отпуска, где ни в чем себе не отказывала. Доброе утро, дорогие мои, понедельник, держимся!

😁83👍2🔥2🤣1

9 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC126 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сами понимаете, перед выходом на работу после отпуска человека может спасти только убойная сила мемов! Несите все, что есть!

😁15👍5🔥4🤣1

8 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC53 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А то ж да, если жена без дела, то все примерно так 🤣 Мужуки, покупайте своим женам маски-тряпочки, да и вообще всю корзину на вб оплатите, а? Тогда женщине некогда будет заниматься ерундой.

🔥5💯3

8 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC81 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот женщину хлебом не корми, а накорми шашлыком и роллом с креветками! Ну и можно еще хинкалек и мороженком заполировать. Так о чем это я? Кормить надо, в общем, обильно и почаще. А когда женщина наетая и довольная, она плюхает себе на лицо маску-пленку и выдает блаженные для всей семьи 15 минут тишины без новых поручений! 🌸 Маска Cosworker Trouble care содержит экстракт чайного дерева, а также какие-то хитрые экстр

👍97🥰2

8 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC99 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Очень важный навык для субботы, я считаю! Доброе утро, дорогие мои!

🔥107👍3

7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC124 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мейк вышел максимально влажным и легким, чисто подчеркнуть загар. Глаз красный от ныряния, волосы вечно мокрые, так что обычно до декоративки у меня руки не доходят 🙅‍♂️

🔥1610👍2

7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC129 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Из декоративки взяла с собой в основном стики — не протекут, не раскрошатся, занимают мало места, наносить быстро и удобно. 🔘Тональный стик Catrice абсолютно чудесен для тех, у кого не сильно жирная кожа. Маскирует минимально, но тон выравнивает. 🔘Стик-румяна от Influence beauty, стойкий натуральный цвет, отлично разносятся пальцем, сами понимаете, кисти я не брала. 🔘Стик-помада Divage сразу и карандаш, и помада,

9👍6🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @teytoktalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 728,761 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женская инстанция” (@teytoktalk), 5,053 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/teytoktalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.