Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 12:35
46
-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:46
47
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:01
47
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 17 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 5 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5343524093201228506
16
33.3%
custom 5221927869629877886
10
20.8%
🐳
6
12.5%
✍
4
8.33%
custom 6211015514563545692
3
6.25%
🍾
2
4.17%
💯
2
4.17%
🗿
2
4.17%
🍌
1
2.08%
💅
1
2.08%
🕊
1
2.08%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2024 to 7 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Двойка пик, купальщицы и внезапная Гертруда Стайн♠
В первый месяц после тихого открытия Studio city cafe на Греческом проспекте я насмотрелась на чайные пары Pols Potten Undressed и зеркало Seletti Two of Spades из постов и сторис посетителей в опальной соцсети. И заприметила чизкейк.
Моя купальщица с карандашных рисунков художницы Эстер Хёрхнер плавала обнажённой в гречишном чае, но для фото я целомудренно прикрыл…
Смена: мы долго держались, но в понедельник подняли цены на всё меню и даже ввели +50₽ (вместо 0₽) на овсяное молоко для кофе. No discussion.
Я:
Leon (1994)
#cinematicdining
Serge открывает бархатные шторы, но лучше бы не?
Бар Serge — новый проект организаторов Çava Disco в отеле Akyan — хронологически последней обители этих модных вечеринок.
Серж Генсбур, имя которого ему дали, в 1969-ом году прогневал Ватикан откровенным эротизмом песни “Je T’aime … Moi Non Plus”, после чего её отменили в Великобритании и Италии. А ещё через десять лет пожелал переложить неприкосновенную Марсельезу н…
Где барышни в джинсах щебечут с французским прононсом...
А время навстречу такси и пролётки проносит. Это надо читать нараспев, потому что настроение — напевать (и цитировать) бардовские песни. И завтракать с открыточным видом на Казанский в Rene.
Здесь и гнутая венская мебель, и метлахская плитка, и живые пушистые пальмы в тяжёлых кашпо — прочные ассоциации с прошлыми столетьями. Так что эта цитата к месту, даже х…
Иммерсивный спектакль и торт-занавес в casper bistro and bar
Не была ни в свадебном салоне с эпичным названием Смерть мужьям!, ни в ресторане Schengen, которые в разное время были на его месте, а в новом casper ужинала на шестой неделе после открытия. То, что происходило в тот вечер, я назвала бы иммерсивным спектаклем из-за чувства сопричастности к авторству своих же впечатлений.
Сначала я посидела с карандашиком …
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @textualfinedining. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“текстовый fine dining🥄” (@textualfinedining), 46 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/textualfinedining.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
