Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Джаха Текстер | реклама, контент и продажи

Channel

Джаха Текстер | реклама, контент и продажи

@textering

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,727subscribers

-41 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001155734146
TypeChannel
Username@textering
CreatedBetween 1 October 2018 and 30 June 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/textering

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

182,7701,3945 August 2026 — 2,768 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,768 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,769 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,770 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,760 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22 subscribers4 September 2026 — 26 subscribers1 October 2026 — 2,737 subscribers7 October 2026 — 2,727 subscribers2,7275 August 20267 October 2026
10 measurements spanning 63 days, net -41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 19:202,727-10
1 Oct 2026, 02:002,737+2,711
4 Sept 2026, 04:2026+4
28 Aug 2026, 10:3422+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:5718-2,742
17 Aug 2026, 10:052,760-10
9 Aug 2026, 23:312,770+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:172,769+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:172,768no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:022,768first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8147.9%
❤3822.5%
👍3822.5%
😢42.37%
👏31.78%
😁31.78%
👌10.592%
🤝10.592%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @textering. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC97 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥8❤3👏3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC146 viewsread 7 August 2026

Я не понимаю людей, кто хочет изменить жизнь, исполнить все свои амбиции и постоянно говорит о больших планах Но боится рисковать после пары раз. Что с вами не так?

4 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC181 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Совет вам на ночь Запомните. Считать себя самым умным можно. Игнорить меня в переписках и делать вид, что супер занят можно. Откладывать дела можно. Не принимать тяжелые решения можно. Избегать давления также можно. Сдаваться и больше никогда не рисковать после пары раз — тоже можно. Это все нормально. И никто вам не запретит так делать. Но в таком случае удивляться и жаловаться на то, что вы оказались в жопе — гл…

👍5🔥4😢2

31 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC235 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О как вам зашел этот пост 😁 И я знаю почему. Сейчас у большинства такой период я вижу. Было пиковое время, но сейчас доход просел. Знаете, почему? Когда рынок расцветает, оч легко в нем делать результат, если ты не рукожоп. Но истинный потенциал раскрывается именно во время стагнации. Когда то что работало раньше, перестает. И появляется неопределенность И вот те, кто построит стабильный доход в таких условиях, …

👍3❤2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC209 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⬇️Я сейчас строю контент-редакцию в одном новостном СМИ в Тг Бюджеты и планы на этот проект большие. Раскрою подробности позже. Но знаете, че? Как ток начал этим заниматься, понял, насколько сейчас на рынке беда с контентом. Моим клиентам повезло, у меня есть пул учеников, которых быстро привлекаю и мы качественно закрываем задачу постинга. Не срывая сроки и публикуя регулярно А вот у конкурентов пиздец. Неактуал…

🔥4❤1👌1👍1

30 Jul 2026, 21:03 UTC227 viewsread 7 August 2026

50 минут писал пост поти час, охуеть

30 Jul 2026, 20:53 UTC238 views24 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🖕 Мои амбиции — мое проклятие и я ненавижу это в себе Мне всегда было мало. Всегда был страх прожить бедную жизнь без денег. Потому что это = проблемы, ругань дома, вечный стресс и улыбка только по праздникам. Поэтому, когда познал ужасы найма за 3 месяца работы там, вернулся в фриланс несмотря на три неудачные попытки до этого. И даже когда в нулину слил первые вложения в блог, продолжил его вести. И несмотря на …

🔥12❤7👍5

30 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC193 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Назревает оч тяжелый для меня пост Я даже не уверен, что смогу дописать его. Но если допишу, выйдет тут один из самых откровенных и эмоциональных за историю блога фух...

❤4🔥2🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC220 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⬇️Угарные конечно люди бывают Сами приходят, пишут как щас тяжело и нужно подниматься, работать. Предлагаешь конкретные действия, так сразу в пассивную агрессию уходят. Почему-то думают, что сразу хочу им продать. Ребят, чтоб я вам продал, вы должны сначала показать, что оно того стоит. Что передо мной не очередной инфантил, который верит в чудо и что все само как-то наладится. Расслабьтесь И перестаньте везде …

❤5🔥4👍2

27 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC238 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📌Помните Мастермайнд? недавно мельком рассказал о нем Напомню, это закрытый чат, где пройдут групповые разборы, в которых каждому выстроим пошаговый план к стабильным 200-300 тыс в месяц на фрилансе. Без рилсов, сториз и прочих заебов. Так вот, там уже народ потихоньку набирается и знакомится. Сам каждого отбирал. Отказал минимум четырем. Это подойдет специалистам с сильным навыком, кто уже зарабатывал в онлайне …

26 Jul 2026, 22:46 UTC227 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

интересно, наберет ли длинный полезный пост дохуя реакций... обычно такое не ценится, хотя в таких больше всего пользы (и да, заберите подкаст, если еще не сделали это)

😁3👍1

26 Jul 2026, 22:42 UTC218 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥Короче почитал я вашу обратную связь по подкасту и понял вот что Сначала, спасибо всем за обратную связь, кто ее дал. А та парочка, кто нет и даже не послушал, ну, ваш выбор оставаться на нынешнем уровне, который вас же НЕ устраивает. В общем, всем зашло, все получили пользу, кайф. Но вот заметил кое-что. Большинство написало, что так или иначе понимали и знали то, что говорится в подкасте. Но прикол в том, что …

🔥12❤3👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @textering. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Руслан.txt
@ruslantxt · 37,405
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Официальный канал Телеметра - Telemetr.me
@telemetr_me · 37,349
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
Бизнес-жилка
@JilkaB · 45,818
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Джаха Текстер | реклама, контент и продажи” (@textering), 2,727 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/textering.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.