Channel
@text_otziv
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001931885630 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @text_otziv |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/text_otziv |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 22 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:00 | 22 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 October 2025 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 9 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 70.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие работницы Света! Хотела поделиться с вами результатами моей работы по очищению рода. Я впервые «познакомилась» с работой нашего Мастера Анастасии в начале сентября 2025 года. Я была как бы в отчаянии от того, что моя дочь не могла забеременеть во второй раз несколько лет после второго брака. Само собой пришло ко мне, что следует искать связи в очищении рода. Так и «случайно» я нашла интервью Анастасии на ютью…
🔥1
Дорогая Анастасия, знаю, сколько сил, души и материальных вложений стоит за каждым постом в этом канале. Это действительно кладезь полезной информации, за который я безмерно благодарна! 🙏 Благодарю за ваш колоссальный труд и ту любовь, которую вы вкладываете в каждый материал. Самое главное — только здесь мне стало всё понятно, потому что вы передаёте живые знания из самого Источника самым простым и доступным языком…
🔥1
Отзыв об энергосессии
Отзыв о курсе Многомерное Исцеление . Поток обучения 2026 год.
🔠🔠🔠🔠Читаю отзывы и хочется поплакать от счастья. Всего 1,5 месяца обучения и ребята уже ведут сеансы на самые разные темы, диагностируют рамкой и маятником, проводят как дистанционные так и очные сессии. А ведь многие в мае пришли в целительство с нуля. Отзыв Натальи: @Natalya_1906 Мой опыт с энергией Архангела Рафаила — это ежедневное откровение. ✨ Хочу поделиться своими наблюдениями.💫✨ Когда моя кошка просит кот…
Отзыв от Елены @AlSeverKosta , 🔆свет к свету
Дорогая Анастасия ❤️❤️❤️ Хочу выразить благодарность за курс “Ангельское Омоложение “♥️ Я очень счастлива , слушать медитации 9 Д , они просто волшебные ✨ Пол года назад мой вес был 64 кг , сейчас мой вес 55 кг 😁 Я в таком весе была 22 года назад , было много проведено работы внутренней , (генеральной уборки ))) Выросла в доходе , чему Я очень рада 😀 Мое видение , стало ярче 👄 Здоровье улучшилось 🙏 Для меня этот г…
Photo, posted without a caption
Анастасия 🙏✨ От всего сердца благодарю Вас и всю Вашу команду за ту колоссальную работу, которую я прохожу у Вас 🤍 И отдельно хочу сказать огромное спасибо одному человеку, благодаря которой я вообще вышла на Вас. Если бы не она, этого пути, этих изменений и этих результатов в моей жизни могло бы просто не быть 🙏 С того момента, как я пошла в обучение и на сеансы, моя жизнь начала меняться очень ощутимо ✨ Сейчас я п…
Photo, posted without a caption
Здравствуйте. Хочу оставить отзыв о 9Д медитации Ангельское омоложение.🕊️ Во-первых, к своему 42-му дню рождения я постройнела в талии на 7 см!!! 🎉🎉🎉 Такая стройная я была 10 лет назад ещё до вторых родов... И это без диет и тренировок... 4 месяца прослушивания медитации... Легкая гимнастика по утрам несколько минут (и то не каждый день)) + медитация Ангельское омоложение перед сном и вуаля... -7 см в талии!!!💃💃💃 …
Хотела написать это сообщение под голосовым сообщением Анастасии ниже, но не нашла такой функции. Настя, это чудо, правда, и от души! Я всегда слушаю стои молитвы и песни. Сегодня послушала медитацию "Очищение от всего плохого" (возможно, у неё другое название), но суть не в этом. Я прослушала её, и почему-то сразу меня потянуло спать. Предыстория: у меня очень сильно болит спина. Я встала, и боли больше нет. Её …
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @text_otziv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 44,379 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Текстовые Отзывы - Анастасия Крейсон” (@text_otziv), 22 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/text_otziv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.