Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✍️ تێکست.نووس🖤

@text_nuss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,012subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001398373324
TypeChannel
Username@text_nuss
CreatedBetween 1 December 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/text_nuss

Growth

8,0068,0128,0097 August 2026 — 8,007 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,007 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,006 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,007 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,012 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,005–8,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:288,012+5
10 Aug 2026, 14:358,007+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:008,006-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:308,007no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:228,007first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 8,012 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (18 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total26,006
Reactions total423
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 30s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

423 reactions across 26 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52223785963828292319422.2%
custom 52355891641660323249221.7%
custom 53708857879507841289221.7%
custom 53642084409504284858620.3%
custom 58124308242340292065913.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 423reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC46 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

لەدەستت دەدەم و کەسێکی تر دەهێنمە شوێنت فێرت دەکەم دونیا لەسەر کەس ناوەستێت ...!!!🖤

custom 52223785963828292311custom 52355891641660323241custom 53642084409504284851custom 58124308242340292061

11 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC311 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

بۆ کەسێک دڵ بخەنە دەریاوە کە هاوسەفەری ئەوێ نەک بەلەم🖤:

custom 52355891641660323244custom 52223785963828292312custom 53642084409504284852custom 53708857879507841281custom 58124308242340292061

10 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC796 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ئازاری هەستەکانم ئەیەیی بەوەی وەک گڵپەی ئاگرم بۆت تۆش وەک چیایەکی سەخت و بەفریت ئاخر خۆ ڕەوا نییە باجی میهرەبانی ئەمە بێت تۆ کە خۆرێکی لە من هەڵهاتوویی با ئاوا بوونت نەبینم៸៸🖤!

custom 52355891641660323244custom 53708857879507841283custom 52223785963828292312custom 53642084409504284852custom 58124308242340292061

9 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC331 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

هەموو شتێکم وێران بووە بەسەر یەکا مێشکم ، ژوورەکەم ، مێشکم ، ژیانم ، مێشکم ، دەروونی خۆم ، مێشکم ،مێشکم ، مێشکم ، ئاخ مێشــکــــم):🖤

custom 52355891641660323246custom 52223785963828292312custom 53642084409504284852custom 53708857879507841282custom 58124308242340292061

8 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,070 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

هەموو شتێک لە گەردووندا بێتاوانە جگە لە مرۆڤ🖤ᵎ!ᵎ

custom 52355891641660323244custom 53708857879507841282custom 52223785963828292311custom 53642084409504284851custom 58124308242340292061

7 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC509 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

من ئێستاش لەپشت ئەو دەرگایەوە وەستاوم و چاوەڕێتم کەزۆر بەتوندی بە ڕوما داتخست 🖤

custom 53642084409504284854custom 52223785963828292312custom 52355891641660323242custom 58124308242340292062custom 53708857879507841281

6 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC≈1,170 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ئەبوو هەرگیز بەم حەدە نەبووایە بۆ دنـیـا پەلەی مەخلووق🖤!

custom 52223785963828292316custom 52355891641660323242custom 58124308242340292062custom 53642084409504284851custom 53708857879507841281

5 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC900 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ئـەی مانگـی خـەونـەڪانم ئـێـسـتا شەوی ڪێ ڕوناڪ دەڪەیـتـەوە🖤!

custom 52355891641660323244custom 52223785963828292312custom 53642084409504284852custom 53708857879507841281custom 58124308242340292061

3 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

هەمووشت تێئەپەڕێ جگە لەوەی لە دڵدا چەقیووە•🖤•

custom 53708857879507841286custom 52223785963828292313custom 52355891641660323242custom 53642084409504284852custom 58124308242340292061

2 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC856 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ڕۆژێک نامەم بۆ ئەنێریت و ئەڵێی خەریکە ئەمرم منیش وەڵامت دەدەمەوە و ئەڵێم گوێی پێ مەدە هەموومان هەر ئەمرین حەقی ئەوڕۆژانەی هەزار جار مردم و بەخەیاڵتدا نەهات🖤

custom 53642084409504284858custom 52355891641660323246custom 53708857879507841285custom 52223785963828292314custom 58124308242340292064

2 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC992 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

زۆر جار توڕەئەبم ئەڵێم ئیتر خۆشم ناوێت دڵم ئەڵێ:وس ترپەکانت ئەوستێنـ🖤

custom 53642084409504284855custom 52355891641660323243custom 52223785963828292312custom 53708857879507841282custom 58124308242340292062

1 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,200 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

نەگریا،بەڵام ئەندامەکانی تری باجەکەیان دا🖤•

custom 52223785963828292316custom 53642084409504284854custom 52355891641660323243custom 53708857879507841283custom 58124308242340292062

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @text_nuss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 281,483 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✍️ تێکست.نووس🖤” (@text_nuss), 8,012 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/text_nuss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.