Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ⲧᥱⲃи

@tewi1ss

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

641subscribers

+98 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003856800457
TypeChannel
Username@tewi1ss
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 15 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tewi1ss

Growth

5436415927 August 2026 — 543 subscribers7 August 2026 — 548 subscribers8 August 2026 — 548 subscribers14 August 2026 — 641 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 528–656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:05641+93
8 Aug 2026, 03:46548no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:53548+5
7 Aug 2026, 14:25543first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
238.7%
avg views ÷ 641 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (15 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,181
Reactions total1,568
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,727 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519509500561353650294225.3%
🕊52514.1%
custom 53324558250405107263589.61%
3058.18%
custom 53956176183904569143008.05%
👻2707.24%
🦄2346.28%
custom 51863905371286414741834.91%
custom 53527327178322432481393.73%
🆒1393.73%
💘1213.25%
custom 5296753127708464916711.91%
🤯571.53%
🏆501.34%
120.322%
👀120.322%
💅80.215%
😭10.027%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,727reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 16 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tewi1ss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC461 views218 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

обожаю рендерить зеленые волосы #фанарт ⭐️⭐️

🦄101custom 519509500561353650262custom 539561761839045691444💘3🕊31🏆1👻1

1 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈1,750 views309 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

какой же кайф рисовать рыб #фанарт

custom 5395617618390456914139🕊80🆒62👻7custom 519509500561353650265custom 51863905371286414744custom 53324558250405107264

29 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,910 views280 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#фанарт #скетч

custom 5395617618390456914117custom 519509500561353650275custom 5186390537128641474666💅4🦄4custom 53324558250405107264🏆1

27 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,630 views259 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

мне племянница выбила колумбину, 6 крутка после дурина кстати, я ахуела а еще спасибо вам огромное за 400 подписчиков 🍆🍆 #традишка #фанарт

🦄111🕊67custom 519509500561353650253custom 51863905371286414748💘5🏆4🆒32

26 Jul 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,710 views231 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

накопилось немного рисунков в скетчбуке😅 и я наконец то сдала вступительный экзамен #традишка

custom 5186390537128641474105custom 519509500561353650260custom 533245582504051072641👻94custom 535273271783224324842🏆2

19 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC≈1,720 views271 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

пока только цветные скетчи, на полноценки сил нет😔 #скетч #фанарт

🕊127🆒63custom 5195095005613536502519💘6👻5custom 53324558250405107263custom 53527327178322432483

12 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,880 views290 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 #скетч #фанарт

custom 5195095005613536502142🕊66💘63👻7custom 53527327178322432484custom 52967531277084649163🏆21

9 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,700 views241 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

этот арт я не могла закончить две недели, но наконец то дорисовала кстати, было бы интересно узнать, что бы вы хотели видеть на моем канале, мб больше фанартов, процессы работ и прочее🌟 #арт #ос

custom 5195095005613536502107🕊62👻46custom 53527327178322432488💘542💅2

9 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC960 views158 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶🫶 🟡🤩олноценка:: ᴨо ᴨᴧᴇчи — 500ᴩ. ᴨо ᴨояᴄ — 1000ᴩ. ᴨоᴧноᴩоᴄᴛ — 1600ᴩ. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🟡🤩ветной скетч:: ᴨо ᴨᴧᴇчи — 300ᴩ. ᴨо ᴨояᴄ — 600ᴩ. ᴨоᴧноᴩоᴄᴛ — 900ᴩ. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🟡🤩кетч:: ᴨо ᴨᴧᴇчи — 100ᴩ. ᴨо ᴨояᴄ — 300ᴩ. ᴨоᴧноᴩоᴄᴛ — 500ᴩ. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 💋!🤩ᥱ ρυᥴ𐔤ю: Фурри; NSFW; Гуро, очень детальные фоны и прочее! 🤩ᥱⲇ᥈ᥲύⲏ 1-3 ⲏᥱⲇᥱ᥈υ💕 🔴За ещё одного персонажа доплата 100%. 🔴Детальный фон — 400 рублей. Фон с заливкой одного цвета; градиен

custom 51950950056135365027334🏆29custom 53324558250405107265🕊4custom 53527327178322432484🆒3💘2

6 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,600 views219 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вместо подготовки к вступительным я рисую полуголых мужиков✅ ахуеть спасибо за звезды❤️ #арт #ос

103🤯51👻44custom 51950950056135365028💘5custom 535273271783224324831🏆1

5 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,160 views203 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

снова рисовали в магме🙌 у меня ещё одна полноценка в процессе, но так лень её доделывать #скетч #ос

custom 53324558250405107269149🕊39custom 53527327178322432488💘5👀3🏆2👻2

30 Jun 2026, 19:03 UTC≈1,370 views243 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

с днем рождения меня, 18 лет исполнилось😅 постараюсь чаще радовать вас новыми артами🤏 вот парочка любимых работ за этот год

custom 5195095005613536502109custom 53324558250405107266548👻5custom 53527327178322432485💘42🕊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @tewi1ss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 167,020 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ⲧᥱⲃи” (@tewi1ss), 641 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tewi1ss.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.