Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Testi Tekek

@testitekek

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,096subscribers

+129 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002473554493
TypeChannel
Username@testitekek
Created9 September 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/testitekek

Growth

1,9672,0962,031.57 August 2026 — 1,967 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,967 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,037 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,096 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,948–2,115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:442,096+59
10 Aug 2026, 05:242,037+70
7 Aug 2026, 03:071,967no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:481,967first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 September 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.5%
avg views ÷ 2,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,420
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held14 (9 September 202426 July 2026)
Views total4,840
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2026, 18:03 UTC≈8,050 viewsread 7 August 2026

🕯 RUMUS REFUND 🕯 Harga Beli × Sisa Durasi ÷ Total Durasi Premium × Service Fee = Total Refund Contoh: 13.000 x 20 : 28 x 0.7 = 7.280 Sisa Durasi: 1 bulan = 28 hari - hari berjalan 💌 KETENTUAN SERVICE FEE 💌 ☁️ 0.8 = pemakaian kurang dari 1 minggu ☁️ 0.7 = belum pernah claim garansi ☁️ 0.6 = sudah pernah claim garansi 1-2× ☁️ 0.5 = sudah pernah claim garansi 3× ☁️ 0.4 = sudah pernah claim garansi > 3× FORMAT REFUN

29 Apr 2026, 05:20 UTC≈10,700 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💌 FORMAT GARANSI APLIKASI 💌 Username tele: @rzkindalvli Aplikasi: Canva Durasi: 1b Tanggal beli: 19/3 No/Email APK: cumacontoh@gmail.com Pass APK: (jika ada) Profil + pin APK: (jika ada) NOTE Bukti trouble APK (SS/Record/Foto) Wajib dalam 1 bubble chat, no bukti no respon.

19 Nov 2024, 10:58 UTC≈20,400 viewsread 7 August 2026

❤️ R&K PAID PROMOTE ❤️ — @designtekek Kalau males ngetik (Tap👇) Versi 1 10000/10 Jujur ini paid promote paling kerasa hasilnya, habis dipost langsung ada chat masuk. Recommended 🫶🏻 Versi 2 1000000/10 Worth it banget, orderan langsung nambah dan akun jadi lebih rame dari biasanya, next mau paid promote lagi 💗 KIRIM RATE & KRITSAR KE KOMENTAR 👇

19 Nov 2024, 10:58 UTC≈24,300 viewsread 7 August 2026

🥂 R&K JASA EDIT 🥂 — @designtekek Kalau males ngetik (Tap👇) Versi 1 1000000/10 Overall puas banget dari awal sampai akhir. Pelayanan oke, hasil juga oke, bakal repeat order lagi 🔥 Versi 2 100000/10 Hasil edit sesuai request bahkan lebih bagus dari yang dibayangin. Pelayanannya cepet, Puas banget! 💞 KIRIM RATE & KRITSAR KE KOMENTAR 👇

19 Nov 2024, 10:58 UTC≈25,500 viewsread 7 August 2026

💌 R&K APLIKASI PREMIUM 💌 — @aplikasitekek Kalau males ngetik (Tap👇) Versi 1 1000000/10 Adminnya ramah! Proses cepat, langsung premium. Worth it banget buat harga segini 😍 Versi 2 1000/10 Cepat, mudah, dan terpercaya! Baru bayar langsung diproses. Mantap sih bakal langganan! 💓 KIRIM RATE & KRITSAR KE KOMENTAR 👇

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @testitekek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 186,594 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Testi Tekek” (@testitekek), 2,096 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/testitekek.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.