🍑 @nai_zi @zh_bj @cn_qq @cn_zh @renqi88 @bbok66 @ggtv91 @hhtv66 @live1688 @semo168 @okso123 @nuerguo @shaofu888 @luowu66 @dashimei @saolang66 @xxbb66
Channel
Test
@test99999809
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001700915959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @test99999809 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/test99999809 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 13 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Videos
- 56
- Links
- 60
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4m 49s
- Average length
- 4m 49s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
T.me/SoftechFXRobot
Asupan SMA 💦 t.me/joinchat/ppfY3oUXvBliNmFl
https://t.me/jibakk
Terlepas dari masa lalu dia tentang orangtuanya atau apapun itu, aslinya cewek ini adalah tipe cewek justifier, cewek jenis ini akan selalu jujur atau minimal terbuka untuk membahas masalah seks, buktinya dia bisa membuka aib itu dengan mudah, ciri ciri yang paling keliatan adalah ketika dia jujur tentang masalah seks, dia akan menurunkan tingkat kesalahan dengan sedikit pembelaan, iya seperti contoh yang dia katakan…
Cowok tidak salah kalo mundur, karena masih ada cowok naif yang berpikir kalo effort itu bisa bikin cewek jatuh cinta, salah, yang bikin cewek jatuh cinta adalah daya tarik dan Nalurinya yang berhasil si cowok picu supaya jatuh cinta, artinya jatuh cinta haruslah terjadi dalam waktu cepat dan hampir tak beralasan, kalo cewek selalu punya alasan untuk mengulur ngulur waktu dan membutuhkan waktu lama untuk sekedar jatu…
Emang bukan effort, beberapa persen cowok bisa mengeluarkan uang berapapun untuk bertaruh, tapi anehnya cewek lebih suka dipertaruhkan daripada diberi kepastian, Ini mindset fckboy, lakukan apapun yang membuat cewek nyaman tanpa menuntut mereka untuk suka balik, dan ketika ada yang suka balik karena disogok effort, selanjutnya cewek tersebut akan mudah buat dikendalikan, fckboy lebih paham masalah ginian. Oke biar le…
Photo, posted without a caption
Cewek manipulatif bisa dilihat dari konsistensi kalimatnya, contohnya adalah: 1. "Aku suka sama sikap kamu, tapi aku belum yakin, coba yakinin aku lebih serius" 2. "Aku suka kamu, tapi aku juga belum bisa lupain dia, aku takut kamu gak bisa sepertinya" 3. "Aku udah punya pacar sih, tapi LDR hehe, kita temenan aja ya dulu" 4. "Kamu keliatan jujur sih, Tapi buktiin dong kalo kamu bisa lebih dari mantanku dulu" . Dari …
@paidpromote_Lpm
Baiklah gua bikin clear, biar kalian khususnya cowok bisa punya mindset yang anti mainstream. Jadi gini, bagaimana cowok bisa kenal sama cewek sampai jadian? Ya karena diawal awal cewek tersebut sangat responsif dan menunjukan ketertarikan sama cowok tersebut, cewek ini tidak membuat cowok bingung dan bener bener menunjukan bahwa cewek ini juga mau dekat dan kenal sama cowok tersebut, artinya cewek tersebut tidak mem…
T.me/hamstER_kombat_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @test99999809. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 11
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 11
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@test99999809 named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Test” (@test99999809), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/test99999809.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.