4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,669–2,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 00:58
2,669
-2
10 Aug 2026, 04:47
2,671
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:03
2,672
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:16
2,672
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 2,669 subscribers
Avg views / post
635
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (17 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
13,327
Reactions total
224
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 54s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
224 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
112
50.0%
💩
49
21.9%
❤
17
7.59%
🔥
11
4.91%
👎
10
4.46%
👏
9
4.02%
🤔
7
3.13%
😁
5
2.23%
👌
4
1.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @terrainstr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.76%
1 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
469
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
675
over 20 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VfnxyTurzw
1
3 August 2026
3 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Сохраните шпаргалку. Как узнать год выпуска аккумулятора Makita:
Смотрим на шильдик.
Находим серийный номер.
Первая цифра после букв — год выпуска.
Подробнее — в видео.
Зачем это нужно:
— чтобы вам не продали старый аккумулятор
— чтобы проверить, не закончилась ли гарантия
С какими брендами ещё непонятки?
У всех своя система, но везде дату можно найти, если знать, куда смотреть.
Самый прекрасный инструмент для сверления отверстий в керамограните — это болгарка и алмазная коронка.
Шесть секунд и готово... Если хоть раз попробуешь так поработать с керамогранитом, то перовые победитовые свёрла и шуруповёрт для этого дела ты уже никогда в руки не возьмёшь... 100%
#hilberg #оснасткадляушм
Многие рано выбрасывают (меняют) алмазные диски на новые.
На фото как раз пример, когда диск выработан на 100%. Тот, который слева. Справа лежит диск новый, что бы вы увидели разницу.
На левом диске алмазные сегменты стоечны под ноль. Вот так и надо всегда...
Изношенный диск — это наш диск с проката на бензорез. Мы его сдаем в прокат и берем плату за каждый мм износа.
Короче, диски до конца изнашиваем, нечего де…
Makita отвечает на вопросы, в том числе ваши. Эксклюзивно в нашем канале.
Мы сделали то, что обещали. Взяли вопросы от читателей канала и пришли с ними к официальному представителю Makita. Вернее они к нам пришли)
Получился честный разговор на 20 минут — без сценария, без рекламных формулировок.
О чём спросили:
✔ Как себя чувствует Makita в России после 22-го и были ли мысли уйти
✔ Что ответить тем, кто говорит: «К…
Клиент прислал видео. Отделочники. Купили у нас дисковую пилу Makita LXT DCS552Z по металлу.
Смотрите, как идёт рез по профилю — ровный, чистый, заводской край. Без заусенцев, без доработки. В тысячу раз лучше и быстрее, чем болгаркой. Нет пыли, грязи, искр.
Такую пилу часто берут кровельщики, потому что она не жгет черепицу, но как видите — отделочникам тоже заходит. Так что не стойте на месте. Пробуйте новое...
…
https://youtu.be/LXovtOTVFjw?si=RjT3o4aOhnD3Zbpo
Лучший тест по шуруповёртам за все времена.
Если не смотрели обязательно посмотрите...
Даже я прилип 🤣, хотя мне редко что бывает интересно по теме инструментов )))
Можно, конечно, докопаться при желании, что, вроде, это всё фигня и не отражает жизнь. Так как срок эксплуатации, то бишь время жизни, можно проверить только жизнью. Это в контексте того, что привычны…
«Аккумуляторная воздуходувка 24V — для чего она годится, а для чего нет...
Для сдува травыпосле стрижки газона - да,
Дляьсдува пыли песка с дорожек - да,
Для листвы на асфальте - да
Для сдува легкого мусора, типа чебонов, пакетов, бумажек - да
Для мокрой листвы - нет
Для камней и щебня - нет
Для стройплощадки - нет.
Если у вас случай с тяжелым мусором — берите либо 40 вольт аккумуляторную, либо бензиновую. У нас…
Раз уж подняли тему с отрезными кругами, то давайте определим, какие круги всё-таки самые народные и лучшие?
Кидайте фото своих кругов или пишите бренд, которым пользуетесь чаще всего, а я потом подведу результаты, и мы все узнаем, какой круг самый народный...
КРАХ-тест отрезных абразивных дисков
На видео мы ломаем абразивный диск. Один крошится как вафля, второй — второй упирается, и даже после слома держит куски. В чём разница? В армировке.
Абразивный диск — это абразивные зёрна и связующее (клей). Чтобы на 10 000 оборотов он не разлетелся вам в лицо, внутрь добавляют стеклосетку — как арматуру в бетон. Именно она удерживает осколки, если диск закусит или поведёт.
В о…
Подделка отрезных дисков.
Приезжал представитель Cutop — предупредил, что появились подделки их дисков.
Визуально их легко отличить. Но будут ли люди заморачиваться и проверять, подделка или нет — вопрос. Всех не предупредишь.
Короче подделка на то и подделка, чтобы обмануть.
А главная мысль этого поста, проста: если что-то подделывают, значит, оригинал того стоит.
"Шляпу" подделывать точно не будут. 100%... эт…
💩6❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @terrainstr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 913,476 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Территория Инструмента” (@terrainstr), 2,669 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/terrainstr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.