Ejha kampaň bude ešte zaujímavá. Zoro začína do Republiky.
❤1👍1😁1

Channel
@termixblog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
197subscribers
+54 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003965908672 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @termixblog |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 23 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/termixblog |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:34 | 197 | +2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:26 | 195 | +4 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 00:21 | 191 | +23 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 168 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 166 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 152 | +9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 143 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 143 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 23 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
55 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 34.5% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 23.6% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 20.0% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 16.4% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.82% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ejha kampaň bude ešte zaujímavá. Zoro začína do Republiky.
❤1👍1😁1
Smeráci na Fikinkovej svadbe. Bol tam aj Ficov syn + celý zoznam hostí tu.
Ajajaaaaj Dannynko, čo prepisuješ statusy? Sa ťa to strašne dotklo, že? Som zaťala do živého, že? Ste tam došli na svadbu svojho "kamoša" a ukradol si si celú pozornosť zas pre seba, aby si bol zaujímavý? Nezáviď....to, že ty si v 40tke úplne single a nikto ťa nechce neni naša vina. To, že musíš dávat trápne inzeráty na Telegram typu: "frajerka mi povedala", aj keď ťa nikto nikdy nevidel so ženou v romantickom kont…
❤8👍2💊1😁1
Stop už, lebo ja skapem od smiechu z týchto komentárov. Ludaaaanky a kvetinky co vsecia iba zavidime tejto elite naroda.
🤣6😁2👍1🤝1😱1
Uaaaaaa🤣🤣🤣🤣 asi som trafila citilivé miestečkooo🤣🤣🤣🤣
😁4
👻NEUBLIZUJTE TEREZKE MICIANIKOVEJ PROSIM VAS ! Je to len dalsie mlade dievca, ktore utrpelo zranenia po 3nasobnom ockovani a pravdepodobne sa to odrazilo na jej uvazovani! Prosim vas majte pre nu porozumenie a strpenie, ma chúďa urcite co robit stravit ten naklad od vlastnych! 🤡🤠
Dnes som sa tu štverala a nadobudla som úplne nový rešpekt voči horolezcom a horským záchranárom.
👍6😁1
POV: Keď nemôžeš regulovať diskusie, mazať komentáre a clipperi sú hostia na svadbe dopadne to tak, že slovenská spoločnosť hlasno prejaví svoj názor na teba práve v deň svadby a odserie si to nevinná nevesta. Dúfam, že si toto Fiki prečíta, aby vedel, čo si o ňom myslia Slováci. Ale veď my len ZÁAAAAAVIDÍMEEEE🤣🤣
❤3👍2
Slovenské influ o*eby. Ona ho nevidela, ale zato Riši ho spomínal vo svojej reči.
🤣5
SULÍKOVÁ SVADBA - POSTREHY: Musím uznať, že naozaj ukážkovú a učebnicovú spravodajskú hru zahrali na starého Sulíka. Na svadbe vlastného syna, o ktorom verejne povedal, že sa za neho hanbí, ho niekto nahral ako na príhovore rozpráva, že Bombic a Šoun sú "celkom pohode chlapci." Na samotnom výroku nevidím nič zlé, problém je, že to hovorí Richard, ktorý sa stavia do role mediátora medzi progresívcami a alternatívou.…
👍7❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @termixblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Termix blog” (@termixblog), 197 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/termixblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.